Literature DB >> 29563049

Noisy vestibular stimulation increases gait speed in normals and in bilateral vestibulopathy.

Shinichi Iwasaki1, Chisato Fujimoto2, Naoya Egami2, Makoto Kinoshita2, Fumiharu Togo3, Yoshiharu Yamamoto3, Tatsuya Yamasoba2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Galvanic vestibular stimulation delivered as zero-mean current noise (noisy GVS) has been shown to improve static and dynamic postural stability probably by enhancing vestibular information.
OBJECTIVE: /Hypothesis: To examine the effect of an imperceptible level of noisy GVS on dynamic locomotion in normal subjects as well as in patients with bilateral vestibulopathy.
METHODS: Walking performance of 19 healthy subjects and 12 patients with bilateral vestibulopathy at their preferred speed was examined during application of noisy GVS with an amplitude ranging from 0 to 1000 μA. The gait velocity, stride length and stride time were analyzed.
RESULTS: Noisy GVS had significant effects on gait velocity, stride length and stride time in healthy subjects as well as in patients with bilateral vestibulopathy (p < 0.05). The optimal amplitude of noisy GVS improved gait velocity by 10.9 ± 1.2%, stride length by 5.7 ± 1.2% and stride time by 4.6 ± 7% (p < 0.0001) compared to the control session in healthy subjects. The optimal stimulus improved gait velocity by 12.8 ± 1.3%, stride length by 8.3 ± 1.1% and stride time by 3.7 ± 7% (p < 0.0001) in patients with bilateral vestibulopathy. The improved values of these parameters of locomotion by noisy GVS in the patients were not significantly different from those in healthy subjects in the control condition (p > 0.4).
CONCLUSION: Noisy GVS is effective in improving gait performance in healthy subjects as well as in patients with bilateral vestibulopathy.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bilateral vestibulopathy; Galvanic vestibular stimulation; Locomotion; Stochastic resonance

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29563049     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  14 in total

1.  Calibrating balance perturbation using electrical stimulation of the vestibular system.

Authors:  R Goel; M J Rosenberg; H S Cohen; J J Bloomberg; A P Mulavara
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 2.  Recent advances in idiopathic bilateral vestibulopathy: a literature review.

Authors:  Chisato Fujimoto; Masato Yagi; Toshihisa Murofushi
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.123

3.  Subthreshold stochastic vestibular stimulation affects balance-challenged standing and walking.

Authors:  Chiara Piccolo; Amanda Bakkum; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  No evidence for after-effects of noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation on motion perception.

Authors:  Aram Keywan; Hiba Badarna; Klaus Jahn; Max Wuehr
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Relative Contribution of Proprioceptive and Vestibular Sensory Systems to Locomotion: Opportunities for Discovery in the Age of Molecular Science.

Authors:  Turgay Akay; Andrew J Murray
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Effect of noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation on dynamic posture sway under visual deprivation in patients with bilateral vestibular hypofunction.

Authors:  Po-Yin Chen; Ying-Chun Jheng; Chien-Chih Wang; Shih-En Huang; Ting-Hua Yang; Po-Cheng Hsu; Chia-Hua Kuo; Yi-Ying Lin; Wei-Yi Lai; Chung-Lan Kao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The Effect of Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation on Visuospatial Cognition in an Incomplete Bilateral Vestibular Deafferentation Mouse Model.

Authors:  Thanh Tin Nguyen; Gi-Sung Nam; Gyu Cheol Han; Chuyen Le; Sun-Young Oh
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Development and Content Validity of the Bilateral Vestibulopathy Questionnaire.

Authors:  Lisa van Stiphout; Israt Hossein; Merel Kimman; Susan L Whitney; Andrianna Ayiotis; Michael Strupp; Nils Guinand; Angélica Pérez Fornos; Josine Widdershoven; Ángel Ramos-Macías; Vincent Van Rompaey; Raymond van de Berg
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 9.  Can Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Be an Effective Management for Bilateral Vestibulopathy?

Authors:  Abdollah Moossavi; Zahra Eshaghi
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2022-03-07

10.  Effects of Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation During a Bimanual Tracking Robotic Task.

Authors:  Bulmaro A Valdés; Carlo Menon
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.