Literature DB >> 29561506

Contrast Sensitivity in Eyes with Central Scotoma: Effect of Stimulus Drift.

Peter Lewis, Abinaya Priya Venkataraman1, Linda Lundström1.   

Abstract

SIGNIFICANCE: In the field of visual rehabilitation of patients with central visual field loss (CFL), knowledge on how peripheral visual function can be improved is essential. This study presents measurements of peripheral dynamic contrast sensitivity (with optical correction) for off-axis viewing angles in subjects with CFL.
PURPOSE: Subjects with CFL rely on a peripheral preferred retinal locus (PRL) for many visual tasks. It is therefore important to ascertain that contrast sensitivity (CS) is maximized in the PRL. This study evaluates the effect of stimulus motion, in combination with optical correction, on CS in subjects with CFL.
METHODS: The off-axis refractive errors in the PRL of five young CFL subjects were measured with a COAS open-view Hartmann-Shack aberrometer. Low-contrast (25% and 10%) and high-contrast resolution acuity for stationary gratings was assessed with and without optical correction. High-contrast resolution was also measured for gratings drifting at 7.5 Hz (within a fixed Gaussian window). Furthermore, resolution CS was evaluated for both stationary and moving gratings with optical correction for a total of two to three spatial frequencies per subject.
RESULTS: High-contrast resolution acuity was relatively insensitive to stimulus drift motion of 7.5 Hz, whereas CS for gratings of 0.5 cycles per degree improved with drift for all subjects. Furthermore, both high- and low-contrast static resolution improved with optical correction.
CONCLUSIONS: Just as for healthy eyes, stimulus motion of 7.5 Hz enhances CS for gratings of low spatial frequency also in the PRL of eyes with CFL. Concurrently, high-contrast resolution is unaffected by the 7.5-Hz drift but improves with off-axis optical correction. This highlights the importance of providing optimal refractive correction for subjects with CFL and that stimulus motion can be used to further enhance CS at low spatial frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29561506     DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  2 in total

1.  Peripheral vision and hazard detection with average phakic and pseudophakic optical errors.

Authors:  Abinaya Priya Venkataraman; Robert Rosén; Aixa Alarcon Heredia; Patricia Piers; Carmen Canovas Vidal; Linda Lundström
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 2.  Peripheral refraction and higher order aberrations.

Authors:  Dmitry Romashchenko; Robert Rosén; Linda Lundström
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 2.742

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.