Literature DB >> 29561419

Prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in gastric cancer.

Yan Zhang1, Jing-Jing Lu, Yi-Ping Du, Chun-Xia Feng, Li-Qiang Wang, Min-Bin Chen.   

Abstract

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been presented to be a prognostic indicator in several types of cancer. However, these issues have not been concluded yet. The present study was therefore performed to determine the prognostic value of NLR and PLR in gastric cancer (GC).A total of 182 GC patients, diagnosed between January 2011 and January 2014, were enrolled in the study. The clinicopathological parameters, laboratory analyses, and outcomes were collected. The association between NLR, PLR, and clinicopathological characters was analyzed with univariate and multivariate analyses.NLR was significantly related to age (P = .026), surgery (P = .006), node status (P = .004), and clinical stage (P = .009). The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were poor in the High-NLR group (OS: 36.0 vs 20.5 months, P < .001, PFS: 33.0 vs 12.0 months, P < .001) and High-PLR group (OS: 31.5 vs 18.5 months, P = .003, PFS: 26.0 vs 11.0 months, P = .01). Multivariate analyses indicated both surgery [for OS hazard ratio (HR) = 2.092, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.345-3.253, P = .001; for PFS HR = 1.939, 95% CI: 1.259-2.988, P = .003] and NLR (for OS HR = 1.585, 95% CI: 1.011-2.485, P = .045) were independent prognostic factors.Elevated NLR and PLR were related with poor prognosis in GC patients before treatment. The NLR was an independent prognostic factor for OS. More studies should be conducted to address the potential prognostic value of NLR and PLR in GC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29561419      PMCID: PMC5895303          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.889


Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related deaths even with improvements in treatment modalities.[ The ability to predict the precise prognosis is critical for choosing the personally treatment plan and follow-up strategies for a patient. The established prognostic factors were tumor, node, tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, and pathological type, etc.[ However, it was reported that even within the same tumor stage, the clinical outcomes of patients can be heterogeneous.[ This implies that further studies should be performed to find more prognostic factors for taking into account. The role of the systemic inflammatory response in cancer has been highlighted in several studies.[ A significant association between elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) with poor prognosis in various types of cancer has been shown.[ Compared with other factors, NLR and PLR are easily, routinely, and inexpensively obtained. Although several studies have valued the relationship between NLR, PLR, and the prognosis of GC, the prognostic importance of these inflammatory markers is still in controversy. We conducted this study to evaluate the relationship between NLR, PLR, and survival of GC, and investigate the prognostic value of NLR and NLR in GC patients before treatment.

Materials and methods

Study population

This study included 182 histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma cases, which were diagnosed in Kunshan First People's Hospital Affiliated to Jiangsu University between January 2011 and January 2014. Patients with incomplete follow-up data or active concurrent infection were excluded. At recruitment, personal data of each participant regarding clinical characters and survival information were collected from clinical record or family contact. The overall survival (OS) was defined as time from the data of diagnosis to the data of death or last visit. The progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the time of diagnosis to the time of progression, relapse, death, or the last follow-up. This prospective observational study was reviewed by our Institutional Review Board and written informed consent was provided by each patient.

Data collection

Clinical characteristics including age, gender, surgery, chemotherapy, tumor location, clinical TNM stage, pathologic type as well as outcomes were collected. The tumors were staged according to the TNM staging system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC 7th ed., 2010). The blood cell counts including neutrophil, platelets, and lymphocyte before treatment were extracted from the medical records. The NLR was calculated by dividing the absolute neutrophil count by the absolute lymphocyte count. In the same way, PLR was defined as the absolute platelet count divided by the absolute lymphocyte count.

Statistical analysis

The optimal cutoff values of NLR and PLR were estimated by the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. Continuous variables were expressed using mean ± SD. Comparisons between groups were performed using Chi-squared test. The Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank tests were used to compare survival curves. Moreover, we conducted multivariate analyses to assess the effects of multiple covariates on the survival outcome. Hazard ratios (HRs) estimated from the multivariable analysis were expressed as relative risks with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). For all the analyses, a 2-sided P value of <.05 was defined as significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL).

Results

Clinicopathologic characteristics

The clinical/pathological characteristics of the 182 patients are summarized in Table 1. Of 182 patients, 122 (67%) were male, and the median age was 65 years (range 29–87 years). Among all the cases, 56 (30.77%) patients were esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma and 48 (26.37%) were diagnosed with gastric antrum cancer. Overall, 134 (73.63%) patients received surgical resection, and 151 (82.97%) patients received at least 1 cycle of chemotherapy. More than half (66.48%) of the patients were diagnosed of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, while the clinical stage III and IV patients were accounted for 48.90% and 22.53%, respectively.
Table 1

Association of the patients’ characteristics with the platelet-to-lymphocyte and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios.

Association of the patients’ characteristics with the platelet-to-lymphocyte and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios.

The association between NLR or PLR and clinicopathologic variables

The optimal cutoff level for the NLR was 2.88 for both OS and PFS when the Youden index was maximal. Similarly, the cutoff level for the PLR was 172 for both OS and PFS (supplementary Figure 1–4). The NLR level before treatment was elevated in 98 (53.85%) patients and a total of 64 (35.16%) patients were with higher PLR level. As summarized in Table 1, increased NLR level was significantly associated with age (P = .026), surgery (P = .006), node status (P = .004), and clinical stage (P = .009). However, PLR was not associated with age, sex, surgery, tumor location, histological type, or clinical stage.

Prognostic factors for OS and PFS

In this study, the median OS for all patients was 28.5 months, while PFS was 19.5 months. We further found that the median OS and PFS were poor in the High-NLR group (OS: 36.0 vs 20.5 months, P < .001, PFS: 33.0 versus 12.0 months, P < .001) and High-PLR group (OS: 31.5 vs 18.5 months, P = .003, PFS: 26.0 versus 11.0 months, P = .01), as shown in Figure (1–4).
Figure 1

Kaplan–Meier survival curves of overall survival according to neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).

Figure 4

Kaplan–Meier survival curves of progression-free survival according to platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR).

Kaplan–Meier survival curves of overall survival according to neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Kaplan–Meier survival curves of progression-free survival according to neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Kaplan–Meier survival curves of overall survival according to platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Kaplan–Meier survival curves of progression-free survival according to platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). The prognostic effect of clinicopathologic variables is summarized in Tables 2 and 3. In univariate analysis, the older age (P = .002), no surgery (P < .001), poorly differentiated histologic type (P = .048), advanced T (P < .001), N (P < .001) and clinical stage (P < .001), higher NLR (P < .001) and higher PLR (P = .004) were identified as poor prognostic factors associated with OS. Although no surgery (P < .001), advanced T (P < .001), N (P < .001) and clinical stage (P < .001), higher NLR (P < .001) and higher PLR (P = .012) were also associated with poor PFS. After multivariate analysis with these selected parameters using Cox regression model, both surgery (HR = 2.092, 95% CI: 1.345–3.253, P = .001) and NLR (HR = 1.585, 95% CI: 1.011–2.485, P = .045) were identified as independent prognostic factors associated with OS.
Table 2

Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors for the prediction of overall survival.

Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors for the prediction of progression-free survival.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors for the prediction of overall survival. Univariate and multivariate analyses of factors for the prediction of progression-free survival.

Discussion

This study investigated the prognostic value of NLR and PLR in GC patients before treatment. We found that a high NLR was associated with age, surgery, node status, and clinical stage. Similar to previous studies, both the elevated NLR and PLR levels predicted poor OS and PFS in GC patients.[ NLR was an independent risk factor for OS in Cox regression analysis. Many types of cancer were proved to have links with infection and inflammatory reaction, such as GC. Helicobacter pylori infection is characterized by an inflammatory infiltrate, consisting mainly of neutrophils and T cells.[ The inflammation reaction is an important factor in tumor cell microenvironment.[ The inflammatory cells, chemokines, and cytokines are responsible for cell proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis.[ The inflammation results are involved in lymphocytopenia, neutrophilia, and thrombocytosis.[ The lymphocyte response plays an important role in immune responses, and it is also a major factor in the suppression of cancer progression.[ The mechanisms of neutrophilia in proliferation and metastasis include release of reactive oxygen species or nitric oxide and remodeling of the extracellular matrix.[ Platelets might participate in the inflammatory reaction by increasing angiogenesis or releasing growth factors.[ The concept of inflammation-based scores, such as the NLR and PLR, has been revealed as negative prognostic factors in various types of solid tumors, such as breast cancer,[ colorectal cancer,[ esophageal squamous cell carcinoma,[ liver cancer,[ and combined small cell lung cancer.[ Several studies also focused on the association between NLR, PLR, and GC.[ A meta-analysis including 10 studies with a total of 2952 cases indicated that elevated NLR predicated poor survival in GC.[ Dogan et al[ found that patients with high PLR and/or NLR have shorter PFS and OS in metastatic GC receiving first-line modified docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (mDCF). Deng et al[ reported that preoperative NLR may serve as potential prognostic biomarkers in patients with GC who underwent surgical resection; however, they did not find that NLR was significantly associated with OS (P = .648) in multivariate analysis. Due to the differences in assays measuring neutrophil and lymphocyte, different population and different survival end-point, we optimized the algorithm results and employed different cut-off values. Fortunately, our results have shown that NLR was the independent prognostic factor for OS (P = .045) in multivariate analysis. Some researchers also compared the prognostic value of NLR and PLR. Kim et al[ reported that although both the NLR and PLR can reflect the prognosis, the NLR is more predictive of OS than the PLR. In Our study, we also found that higher NLR and higher PLR were associated with poor OS and PFS. After multivariate analysis, only NLR was identified as an independent prognostic factor for OS. We supposed that NLR has more predictive value than PLR. As NLR is the ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes, high NLR means a relatively higher neutrophils and lower lymphocyte levels. A high NLR indicated an imbalance in the immune response, which impaired the normal anti-tumor functions.[ Thus, tumor recurrence and invasion may occur. Given that some potential limitations exist in the present study, bias is inevitable. This retrospective study was conducted in 1 single institution, and some potential cofactors related to systematic inflammation and immunity have not been considered in all analyses. Our results still need more evidences to support. In conclusion, high level of NLR and PLR was associated with poor OS and PFS in GC patients. NLR was identified as an independent prognostic factor for GC patients. Larger, prospective, and randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings and to elucidate the potential mechanism of systemic inflammatory response against tumor cells.

Author contributions

Data curation: Y-P. Du, C-X. Feng. Formal analysis: C-X. Feng. Funding acquisition: M. Chen. Methodology: L-Q. Wang, M. Chen. Software: J.J. Lu, Y-P. Du. Supervision: L-Q. Wang. Writing – original draft: Y. Zhang. Writing – review & editing: M. Chen.
  32 in total

1.  Gastric cancer--an enigmatic and heterogeneous disease.

Authors:  Manish A Shah; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Introduction to tumor microenvironment regulation of cancer cell survival, metastasis, inflammation, and immune surveillance.

Authors:  Gregg L Semenza; Peter P Ruvolo
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-12-23

Review 3.  Platelets in cancer metastasis: To help the "villain" to do evil.

Authors:  Nailin Li
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Cancer Statistics, 2017.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Prognostic Significance of Inflammatory and Nutritional Parameters in Patients with Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Tatsuya Miyazaki; Makoto Sakai; Makoto Sohda; Naritaka Tanaka; Takehiko Yokobori; Yoko Motegi; Masanobu Nakajima; Minoru Fukuchi; Hiroyuki Kato; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  [Thrombocytosis Associated with Poor Prognosis in Patients with Gastric Cancer].

Authors:  Katsutoshi Shoda; Shuhei Komatsu; Daisuke Ichikawa; Toshiyuki Kosuga; Kazuma Okamoto; Tomohiro Arita; Hirotaka Konishi; Ryo Morimura; Yasutoshi Murayama; Atsushi Shiozaki; Yoshiaki Kuriu; Hisashi Ikoma; Masayoshi Nakanishi; Hitoshi Fujiwara; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  Gan To Kagaku Ryoho       Date:  2015-11

Review 7.  The immunobiology of cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting.

Authors:  Gavin P Dunn; Lloyd J Old; Robert D Schreiber
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 31.745

8.  Prognostic value of pre-operative inflammatory response biomarkers in gastric cancer patients and the construction of a predictive model.

Authors:  Qiwen Deng; Bangshun He; Xian Liu; Jin Yue; Houqun Ying; Yuqin Pan; Huiling Sun; Jie Chen; Feng Wang; Tianyi Gao; Lei Zhang; Shukui Wang
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 9.  Neutrophils in Cancer: Two Sides of the Same Coin.

Authors:  Eileen Uribe-Querol; Carlos Rosales
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 4.818

10.  Elevated Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio Is Associated with Poor Survival Outcomes in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Xiaobin Gu; Xian-Shu Gao; Shangbin Qin; Xiaoying Li; Xin Qi; Mingwei Ma; Hao Yu; Shaoqian Sun; Dong Zhou; Wen Wang; Wei Xiong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  30 in total

1.  Association between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and nutritional status in geriatric patients.

Authors:  Tezcan Kaya; Seyyid Bilal Açıkgöz; Mehmet Yıldırım; Ahmet Nalbant; Ayfer Erdoğan Altaş; Hakan Cinemre
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  The relationship between neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and early renal fibrosis and renal prognosis in patients with lupus nephritis.

Authors:  Guming Zou; Hongmei Gao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as predictors of 12-week treatment response and drug persistence of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective chart review analysis.

Authors:  Han-Na Lee; Yun-Kyung Kim; Geun-Tae Kim; Eunyoung Ahn; Min Wook So; Dong Hyun Sohn; Seung-Geun Lee
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 2.631

4.  A retrospective study of clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of Krukenberg tumor with gastric origin.

Authors:  Xiaolin Lin; Ting Han; Meng Zhuo; Tengfei Liu; Zebing Liu; Dongxi Xiang; Hong Li; Xiuying Xiao
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-06

5.  Association between neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Krishna Kotecha; Animesh Singla; Philip Townend; Neil Merrett
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Utility and Limitation of Preoperative Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio as a Prognostic Factor in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ei Uchinaka; Masataka Amisaki; Masaki Morimoto; Naruo Tokuyasu; Teruhisa Sakamoto; Soichiro Honjo; Hiroaki Saito; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 1.641

7.  Personalized Antibodies for Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma (PANGEA): A Phase II Study Evaluating an Individualized Treatment Strategy for Metastatic Disease.

Authors:  Daniel V T Catenacci; Stephanie Moya; Samantha Lomnicki; Leah M Chase; Bryan F Peterson; Natalie Reizine; Lindsay Alpert; Namrata Setia; Shu-Yuan Xiao; John Hart; Uzma D Siddiqui; D Kyle Hogarth; Oliver S Eng; Kiran Turaga; Kevin Roggin; Mitchell C Posner; Paul Chang; Sunil Narula; Murtuza Rampurwala; Yuan Ji; Theodore Karrison; Chih-Yi Liao; Blase N Polite; Hedy L Kindler
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 39.397

8.  Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells Promote Self-Migration and Self-Invasion by Activating Neutrophils to Upregulate Notch3 Expression of Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Weidong Peng; Youjing Sheng; Han Xiao; Yuanzi Ye; Louis Boafo Kwantwi; Lanqing Cheng; Yuanchong Wang; Jiegou Xu; Qiang Wu
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-01-18

9.  Prognostic Value of Restaging F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography to Predict 3-Year Post-Recurrence Survival in Patients with Recurrent Gastric Cancer after Curative Resection.

Authors:  Sung Hoon Kim; Bong Il Song; Hae Won Kim; Kyoung Sook Won; Young Gil Son; Seung Wan Ryu
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Comparison of Perioperative Chemotherapy versus Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Operable Stomach Cancer: A Western Canadian Province Experience.

Authors:  Adnan Zaidi; Amal Khan; Claire Duval; Kamal Haider; Osama Ahmed; Dorie-Anna Dueck; Bryan Brunet; Donald Gardiner; Shahid Ahmed
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.