Claire O'Callaghan1, Julie M Hall2, Alessandro Tomassini3, Alana J Muller4, Ishan C Walpola4, Ahmed A Moustafa5, James M Shine6, Simon J G Lewis4. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: co365@cam.ac.uk. 2. Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; School of Social Sciences and Psychology, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia. 3. Department of Clinical Neurosciences and Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 4. Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. 5. School of Social Sciences and Psychology, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia. 6. Brain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; School of Psychology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Models of hallucinations emphasize imbalance between sensory input and top-down influences over perception, as false perceptual inference can arise when top-down predictions are afforded too much precision (certainty) relative to sensory evidence. Visual hallucinations in Parkinson's disease (PD) are associated with lower-level visual and attentional impairments, accompanied by overactivity in higher-order association brain networks. PD therefore provides an attractive framework to explore contributions of bottom-up versus top-down disturbances in hallucinations. METHODS: We characterized sensory processing during perceptual decision making in patients with PD with (n = 20) and without (n = 25) visual hallucinations and control subjects (n = 12), by fitting a hierarchical drift diffusion model to an attentional task. The hierarchical drift diffusion model uses Bayesian estimates to decompose task performance into parameters reflecting drift rates of evidence accumulation, decision thresholds, and nondecision time. RESULTS: We observed slower drift rates in patients with hallucinations, which were less sensitive to changes in task demand. In contrast, wider decision boundaries and shorter nondecision times relative to control subjects were found in patients with PD regardless of hallucinator status. Inefficient and less flexible sensory evidence accumulation emerges as a unique feature of PD hallucinators. CONCLUSIONS: We integrate these results with evidence accumulation and predictive coding models of hallucinations, suggesting that in PD sensory evidence is less informative and may therefore be down-weighted, resulting in overreliance on top-down influences. Considering impaired drift rates as an approximation of reduced sensory precision, our findings provide a novel computational framework to specify impairments in sensory processing that contribute to development of visual hallucinations.
BACKGROUND: Models of hallucinations emphasize imbalance between sensory input and top-down influences over perception, as false perceptual inference can arise when top-down predictions are afforded too much precision (certainty) relative to sensory evidence. Visual hallucinations in Parkinson's disease (PD) are associated with lower-level visual and attentional impairments, accompanied by overactivity in higher-order association brain networks. PD therefore provides an attractive framework to explore contributions of bottom-up versus top-down disturbances in hallucinations. METHODS: We characterized sensory processing during perceptual decision making in patients with PD with (n = 20) and without (n = 25) visual hallucinations and control subjects (n = 12), by fitting a hierarchical drift diffusion model to an attentional task. The hierarchical drift diffusion model uses Bayesian estimates to decompose task performance into parameters reflecting drift rates of evidence accumulation, decision thresholds, and nondecision time. RESULTS: We observed slower drift rates in patients with hallucinations, which were less sensitive to changes in task demand. In contrast, wider decision boundaries and shorter nondecision times relative to control subjects were found in patients with PD regardless of hallucinator status. Inefficient and less flexible sensory evidence accumulation emerges as a unique feature of PD hallucinators. CONCLUSIONS: We integrate these results with evidence accumulation and predictive coding models of hallucinations, suggesting that in PD sensory evidence is less informative and may therefore be down-weighted, resulting in overreliance on top-down influences. Considering impaired drift rates as an approximation of reduced sensory precision, our findings provide a novel computational framework to specify impairments in sensory processing that contribute to development of visual hallucinations.
Authors: Philip R Corlett; Guillermo Horga; Paul C Fletcher; Ben Alderson-Day; Katharina Schmack; Albert R Powers Journal: Trends Cogn Sci Date: 2018-12-21 Impact factor: 20.229
Authors: Saee Paliwal; Philip E Mosley; Michael Breakspear; Terry Coyne; Peter Silburn; Eduardo Aponte; Christoph Mathys; Klaas E Stephan Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-10-15 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Marcella Montagnese; Franziska Knolle; Joost Haarsma; Juliet D Griffin; Alex Richards; Petra E Vertes; Beatrix Kiddle; Paul C Fletcher; Peter B Jones; Michael J Owen; Peter Fonagy; Edward T Bullmore; Raymond J Dolan; Michael Moutoussis; Ian M Goodyer; Graham K Murray Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2020-05-07 Impact factor: 4.939