Literature DB >> 29560559

Sex Offender Management Policies and Evidence-Based Recommendations for Registry Reform.

Jill S Levenson1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal of this paper is to improve evidence-based sex offender management systems through an understanding of the research findings related to the stated goals and unintended consequences of such laws. RECENT
FINDINGS: Assessment tools using factors derived from research studies can improve the identification of higher-risk sex offenders, so that more intensive or restrictive interventions can be tailored to those who pose the highest threat to community safety. After substantial time offense-free in the community, even higher-risk offenders become less likely to reoffend, suggesting that registration durations can be modified to utilize resources more efficiently. Several strategies for applying the evidence base to inform the utility, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of sex offender policies include (1) use of empirically derived risk assessment tools to classify offenders and modify registration requirements accordingly, (2) removal of juveniles from registries; and (3) elimination of residence restrictions.

Keywords:  Notification; Recidivism; Registration; Residence restrictions; SORN; Sex offender

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29560559     DOI: 10.1007/s11920-018-0884-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep        ISSN: 1523-3812            Impact factor:   5.285


  25 in total

1.  Sex offender notification and protective behavior.

Authors:  Victoria Simpson Beck; Lawrence F Travis
Journal:  Violence Vict       Date:  2004-06

2.  Megan's Law and its impact on community re-entry for sex offenders.

Authors:  Jill S Levenson; David A D'Amora; Andrea L Hern
Journal:  Behav Sci Law       Date:  2007

3.  Improving the predictive accuracy of Static-99 and Static-2002 with older sex offenders: revised age weights.

Authors:  Leslie Helmus; David Thornton; R Karl Hanson; Kelly M Babchishin
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2011-08-15

4.  Differences between sexually victimized and nonsexually victimized male adolescent sexual abusers: developmental antecedents and behavioral comparisons.

Authors:  David L Burton; Kerry Jo Duty; George S Leibowitz
Journal:  J Child Sex Abus       Date:  2011-01

5.  What Sexual Recidivism Rates Are Associated With Static-99R and Static-2002R Scores?

Authors:  R Karl Hanson; David Thornton; Leslie-Maaike Helmus; Kelly M Babchishin
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2015-03-25

6.  What's in a Name? Evaluating the Effects of the "Sex Offender" Label on Public Opinions and Beliefs.

Authors:  Andrew J Harris; Kelly M Socia
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2014-12-25

7.  High-risk sex offenders may not be high risk forever.

Authors:  R Karl Hanson; Andrew J R Harris; Leslie Helmus; David Thornton
Journal:  J Interpers Violence       Date:  2014-03-24

8.  Community Protection Policies and Repeat Sexual Offenses in Florida.

Authors:  Jill S Levenson; Kristen M Zgoba
Journal:  Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol       Date:  2015-03-10

9.  Percentage of named offenders on the registry at the time of the assault: reports from sexual assault survivors.

Authors:  Sarah W Craun; Catherine A Simmons; Kristen Reeves
Journal:  Violence Against Women       Date:  2011-11-24

10.  Our minds are made up--don't confuse us with the facts: commentary on policies concerning children with sexual behavior problems and juvenile sex offenders.

Authors:  Mark Chaffin
Journal:  Child Maltreat       Date:  2008-05
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Integration of People Convicted of a Sexual Offence Into the Community and Their (Risk) Management.

Authors:  K F McCartan; K Richards
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.285

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.