| Literature DB >> 29559904 |
Jan Kassubek1, Hans-Peter Müller1, Kelly Del Tredici2, Michael Hornberger3, Matthias L Schroeter4, Karsten Müller4, Sarah Anderl-Straub1, Ingo Uttner1, Murray Grossman5, Heiko Braak2, John R Hodges6, Olivier Piguet7, Markus Otto1, Albert C Ludolph1.
Abstract
Objective: Recently, the characteristic longitudinal distribution pattern of the underlying phosphorylated TDP-43 (pTDP-43) pathology in the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) excluding Pick's disease (PiD) across specific brain regions was described. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether in vivo investigations of bvFTD patients by use of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) were consistent with these proposed patterns of progression.Entities:
Keywords: diffusion tensor imaging; fractional anisotropy; frontotemporal lobar degeneration; neuropathology; staging
Year: 2018 PMID: 29559904 PMCID: PMC5845670 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00047
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
Demographic parameters for bvFTD patients (N = 62) and controls (N = 47).
| bvFTD | 18 | 10 | 65 ± 11 | 7/11 | 3 ± 2 | 25 ± 5 |
| Controls | 15 | 6 | 63 ± 12 | 9/6 | n.a. | n.a. |
| bvFTD | 10 | 5 | 62 ± 13 | 5/5 | 6 ± 8 | 24 ± 4 |
| Controls | 7 | 3 | 61 ± 6 | 3/4 | n.a. | n.a. |
| bvFTD | 34 | 34 | 62 ± 8 | 23/11 | 5 ± 3 | n.av. |
| Controls | 25 | 25 | 69 ± 7 | 11/14 | n.a. | n.a. |
| bvFTD | 62 | 49 | 63 ± 10 | 35/27 | 5 ± 4 | 24 ± 5 |
| Controls | 47 | 34 | 66 ± 9 | 23/24 | n.a. | n.a. |
| P | > 0.05 | > 0.05 | ||||
Values are given in mean (± standard deviation). MMSE, Mini-Mental-State-Examination (MMSE) (Folstein et al., .
Figure 1(A) Data analysis scheme. (i) To obtain a common coordinate frame, baseline and follow-up DTI data were aligned by half-way correction. (ii) After landmark normalization, study-specific b0 and FA templates were created. (iii) DTI data of all visits were stereotaxically normalized in the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) coordinate frame in an iterative process. Then, the voxelwise statistical comparison between the patients and the control group was performed by whole brain based spatial statistics (WBSS). After averaging controls' data sets, fiber tracts were calculated from this averaged data set. Finally, tractwise fractional anisotropy statistics (TFAS) was applied. (B) Decision algorithm for categorization. From all bvFTD patients, those were further analyzed who had z-transformed TOI-FA values < 0, i.e., TOI-FA values below the FA-threshold defined for the uncinate fascicle (bvFTD-stage 1). Of this group, those were defined for bvFTD-stage 1 who had z-transformed TOI-FA-values > 0 in the corticostriatal pathway, and those were defined for bvFTD-stage 2 who had z-transformed TOI-FA-values > 0 in the corticospinal tract. The remaining individuals were categorized into bvFTD-stages 3 or 4, depending on whether their z-transformed TOI-FA-values in the optic radiation were > 0 or < 0.
Figure 2(A) 3D-images of tracts of interest. 3D-images of tracts of interest: fasciculus uncinatus, corresponding to bvFTD stage 1; corticostriatal pathway, corresponding to bvFTD stage 2; corticospinal tract (CST) corresponding to bvFTD stage 3, optic radiation, corresponding to bvFTD stage 4; superior cerebellar peduncle as reference path. (B) Longitudinal FA differences in stage-related tract systems. Longitudinal averaged FA differences (baseline—follow-up) in tracts at the group level—*significance.
Tract-of-interest (TOI) based fiber tracking (FT).
| Fasciculus uncinatus | bvFTD-stage 1 | ±39/-1/-23 | ±14/48/-5 |
| Corticostriatal path | bvFTD-stage 2 | ±23/22/12 | ±13/38/36 |
| Corticospinal tract | bvFTD-stage 3 | ±27/-18/18 | ±19/-40/58 |
| Optic radiation | bvFTD-stage 4 | ±45/-40/-3 | ±26/-82/2 |
| Superior cerebellar peduncle | reference | 0/-29/-25 | ±27/-67/-42 |
Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) coordinates for seed and target ROIs for the respective FTs for the TOI approach. ROI sizes were 10 mm for all seed ROIs and 20 mm for all target ROIs.
Figure 3Longitudinal FA decrease in different tract systems: prominent differences for the CST (bvFTD stage 3). (A) Correlations of FA reductions in bvFTD patients between tract systems. (B) Squared differences of FA decrease in the CST compared to averaged FA decreases in the other tract systems. A “dichotomous” behavior was identified: one bvFTD subgroup A (N = 22) with an FA decrease in the CST which is different to the FA decrease in the other stage-related tract structures (S > 0.011) and the other subgroup (group B, N = 29) with an FA decrease in the CST which is similar to the FA decrease in the other stage-related tract structures (S < 0.011). The four available pathology results were indicated in red/orange.
Figure 4Comparison at the group level—bvFTD-patients vs. controls. (A) Whole brain-based spatial statistics (WBSS) of longitudinal alterations in FA maps of 49 bvFTD-patients vs. 34 controls (at FDR corrected p < 0.05). (B) WBSS of FA maps of 62 bvFTD-patients vs. 47 controls (at FDR corrected p < 0.05). (C) Whole brain-based spatial statistics (WBSS) of FA maps (FDR corrected) in sagittal projectional views for different significances. (D) Significance levels for TFAS of tract systems corresponding to bvFTD-stages: fasciculus uncinatus (bvFTD stage 1), corticostriatal pathway (bvFTD stage 2), corticospinal tract (CST) (bvFTD stage 3), optic radiation (bvFTD stage 4), and as the reference path the superior cerebellar peduncle.
Figure 5Individual examples for the staging categorization. Individual cross-sectional examples for the categorization of bvFTD patients into bvFTD stages based upon deviations of z-transformed FA-values (TFAS) from controls' values for different bvFTD stages. Left: baseline categorization, Right: categorization at follow-up.
Staging categorization.
| 1 | 10 | 4 |
| 2 | 24 | 23 |
| 3 | 9 | 8 |
| 4 | 7 | 7 |
| not stageable | 12 | 7 |
| ∑ | 62 | 49 |
At baseline and at follow-up, 8 out of 24 bvFTD patients already showed involvement of the optic radiation.