Literature DB >> 29559562

Adjuvant Treatment for POLE Proofreading Domain-Mutant Cancers: Sensitivity to Radiotherapy, Chemotherapy, and Nucleoside Analogues.

Inge C Van Gool1, Emily Rayner2, Elisabeth M Osse1, Remi A Nout3, Carien L Creutzberg3, Ian P M Tomlinson2,4, David N Church2,5, Vincent T H B M Smit1, Niels de Wind6, Tjalling Bosse7, Mark Drost8.   

Abstract

Purpose: Pathogenic POLE proofreading domain mutations are found in many malignancies where they are associated with ultramutation and favorable prognosis. The extent to which this prognosis depends on their sensitivity to adjuvant treatment is unknown, as is the optimal therapy for advanced-staged or recurrent POLE-mutant cancers.Experimental Design: We examined the recurrence-free survival of women with POLE-mutant and POLE-wild-type endometrial cancers (EC) in the observation arm of the randomized PORTEC-1 endometrial cancer trial (N = 245 patients with stage I endometrial cancer for analysis). Sensitivity to radiotherapy and selected chemotherapeutics was compared between Pole-mutant mouse-derived embryonic stem (mES) cells, generated using CRISPR-Cas9 (Pole mutations D275A/E275A, and cancer-associated P286R, S297F, V411L) and isogenic wild-type cell lines.
Results: In the observation arm of the PORTEC-1 trial (N = 245), women with POLE-mutant endometrial cancers (N = 16) had an improved recurrence-free survival (10-year recurrence-free survival 100% vs. 80.1% for POLE-wild-type; HR, 0.143; 95% confidence interval, 0.001-0.996; P = 0.049). Pole mutations did not increase sensitivity to radiotherapy nor to chemotherapeutics in mES cells. In contrast, Pole-mutant cells displayed significantly increased sensitivity to cytarabine and fludarabine (IC50Pole P286R-mutant vs. wild-type: 0.05 vs. 0.17 μmol/L for cytarabine, 4.62 vs. 11.1 μmol/L for fludarabine; P < 0.001 for both comparisons).Conclusions: The favorable prognosis of POLE-mutant cancers cannot be explained by increased sensitivity to currently used adjuvant treatments. These results support studies exploring minimization of adjuvant therapy for early-stage POLE-mutant cancers, including endometrial and colorectal cancers. Conversely, POLE mutations result in hypersensitivity to nucleoside analogues, suggesting the use of these compounds as a potentially effective targeted treatment for advanced-stage POLE-mutant cancers. Clin Cancer Res; 24(13); 3197-203. ©2018 AACR. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29559562     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  17 in total

Review 1.  POLE proofreading defects: Contributions to mutagenesis and cancer.

Authors:  Vivian S Park; Zachary F Pursell
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-02-16

2.  POLE Mutation Characteristics in a Chinese Cohort with Endometrial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yiran Li; Qizhi He; Shuangdi Li; Xiaoli Wen; Lei Ye; Kai Wang; Xiaoping Wan
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Impact of Molecular Classification on Treatment Paradigms in Uterine Cancers.

Authors:  Casey M Cosgrove; David Barrington; Floor J Backes
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  High polymerase ε expression associated with increased CD8+T cells improves survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Kyueng-Whan Min; Wan-Seop Kim; Dong-Hoon Kim; Byoung Kwan Son; Young Ha Oh; Mi Jung Kwon; Hye Seung Lee; Seung Eun Lee; In Ae Kim; Ji-Yong Moon; Kyoung-Yeon Kim; Jung-Hoon Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Selecting Adjuvant Treatment for Endometrial Carcinoma Using Molecular Risk Factors.

Authors:  Bastiaan G Wortman; Remi A Nout; Tjalling Bosse; Carien L Creutzberg
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  Incorporation of molecular characteristics into endometrial cancer management.

Authors:  Lisa Vermij; Vincent Smit; Remi Nout; Tjalling Bosse
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 7.  Clinical actionability of molecular targets in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Urick; Daphne W Bell
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Germline POLE and POLD1 proofreading domain mutations in endometrial carcinoma from Middle Eastern region.

Authors:  Abdul K Siraj; Sandeep Kumar Parvathareddy; Rong Bu; Kaleem Iqbal; Sarah Siraj; Tariq Masoodi; Rica Micaela Concepcion; Laila Omar Ghazwani; Ismail AlBadawi; Fouad Al-Dayel; Khawla S Al-Kuraya
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 5.722

9.  Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of 'multiple-classifier' endometrial carcinomas.

Authors:  Alicia León-Castillo; Ester Gilvazquez; Remi Nout; Vincent Thbm Smit; Jessica N McAlpine; Melissa McConechy; Stefan Kommoss; Sara Y Brucker; Joseph W Carlson; Elisabeth Epstein; Tilman T Rau; Robert A Soslow; Raji Ganesan; Xavier Matias-Guiu; Esther Oliva; Beth T Harrison; David N Church; C Blake Gilks; Tjalling Bosse
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2020-01-12       Impact factor: 7.996

10.  Molecular Classification of the PORTEC-3 Trial for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Impact on Prognosis and Benefit From Adjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Alicia León-Castillo; Stephanie M de Boer; Melanie E Powell; Linda R Mileshkin; Helen J Mackay; Alexandra Leary; Hans W Nijman; Naveena Singh; Pamela M Pollock; Paul Bessette; Anthony Fyles; Christine Haie-Meder; Vincent T H B M Smit; Richard J Edmondson; Hein Putter; Henry C Kitchener; Emma J Crosbie; Marco de Bruyn; Remi A Nout; Nanda Horeweg; Carien L Creutzberg; Tjalling Bosse
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.