Literature DB >> 29559339

Are both notes of the common cuckoo's call necessary for familiarity recognition?

Csaba Moskát1, Márk E Hauber2, Miklós Bán3, Attila Fülöp3, Nikoletta Geltsch4, Attila Marton3, Zoltán Elek4.   

Abstract

Common cuckoos (Cuculus canorus) are best known for their simple two-note calls ("cu-coo"), which are uttered only by males during the breeding season. A previous playback study revealed that territorial males were more tolerant toward playbacks of the calls of familiar, neighbouring individuals than toward unfamiliar, stranger simulated intruders, exhibiting the classical "dear-enemy" phenomenon. Here we experimentally assessed whether the acoustic cues for familiarity recognition are encoded in the first and/or second note of these simple calls. To do so, we played mixed sound files to radio-tagged cuckoos, where the first part of the two-note calls was taken from strangers and the second part from neighbours, or vice versa. As controls, we used behavioural data from two-note neighbour and two-note stranger call playbacks. Cuckoos responded consistently to the two types of mixed sound files. When either the first or second note of the call was taken from a stranger and the other note from a neighbour, they responded to these sound files similarly to two-note playbacks of strangers: they approached the speaker of the playbacks more closely and the calling response-latency to playbacks was longer than to familiar controls. These findings point to the importance of both notes in familiarity recognition. We conclude that familiarity recognition in male common cuckoos needs the complete structure of the two-note cuckoo call, which is characteristic for this species.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic manipulation; Dear-enemy effect; Individual recognition; Neighbour-stranger discrimination; Playback; Sound analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29559339     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.03.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  3 in total

1.  Host alarm calls attract the unwanted attention of the brood parasitic common cuckoo.

Authors:  Attila Marton; Attila Fülöp; Katalin Ozogány; Csaba Moskát; Miklós Bán
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Syntax errors do not disrupt acoustic communication in the common cuckoo.

Authors:  Csaba Moskát; Márk E Hauber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Functional significance of cuckoo Cuculus canorus calls: responses of conspecifics, hosts and non-hosts.

Authors:  Piotr Tryjanowski; Federico Morelli; Tomasz S Osiejuk; Anders Pape Møller
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.