| Literature DB >> 29558494 |
Aftab Ahmad1, Mohammed F Abuzinadah2, Huda M Alkreathy3, Babajan Banaganapalli4,5, Mohd Mujeeb6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ursolic acid (UA) is a promising molecule with anti-inflammatory, analgesic and potential anti-arthritic activity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29558494 PMCID: PMC5860693 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193451
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Ursolic acid (3β-hydroxy-urs- 12-en-28-oic acid).
Fig 2HPTLC chromatogram showing ursolic acid peak (Rf = 0.49).
Particle size, polydispersity index (PI) and zeta potential values of OLE-loaded NLC and OLE-free NLC.
| Formulations | Particle size | Polydispersity index (PDI) | Zeta Potential (mV) |
|---|---|---|---|
| OLE-loaded NLC | 120 ± 5.8 | 0.162 ± 0.022 | -27.6 ± 3.5 |
| OLE-free NLC | 107± 8.7 | 0.132 ± 0.016 | -25.5 ± 2.7 |
Fig 3Size distribution of OLE-NLC.
Fig 4Transmission electron microphraph (TEM).
Effect of application of OLE loaded NLC on paw edema in rats.
| Treatment | Paw volume (mL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 Day | 5 Day | 12 Day | 21 Day | |
| 1.34 ± 0.08 | 1.30 ± 0.04 | 1.32 ± 0.05 | 1.31 ± 0.04 | |
| 1.9 ± 0.04 | 2.1 5± 0.05 | 2.60 ± 0.08 | 2.72 ± 0.02 | |
| 1.4 ± 0.06 | 1.68 ± 0.07 | 1.47 ± 0.06 | 1.43 ± 0.07 | |
| 1.4 6± 0.05 | 1.60 ± 0.03 | 1.44 ± 0.02 | 1.38 ± 0.03 | |
Values expressed as mean ± standard error of mean.
#p<0.01 as compared to control group
*p<0.05
**p<0.01 as compared to toxic control.
The comparisons were made by ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test.
Effect of OLE loaded NLC on hematological, inflammatory mediators and cyclooxygenase enzymes.
| Treatment | Hematological parameters | Inflammatory mediators | COX Inhibition (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBC | WBC | ESR | Hb | TNF-α | IL-1 | COX-1 | COX-2 | |
| 7.11 ± 0.83 | 6.6 ± 0.65 | 2.4 ± 0.31 | 13.4 ± 1.50 | 0.13 ±0.05 | 0.38 ± 0.07 | --- | --- | |
| 4.13 ± 0.06 | 9.81± 1.2 | 3.2 ± 0.52 | 9.8 ± 0.81 | 0.45 ±0.10 | 0.0.98±0.06 | --- | --- | |
| 6.74 ± 0.08 | 7.12 ± 0.05 | 2.7 ± 0.20 | 12.5± 1,2 | 0.16 ±0.06 | 0.44± 0.05 | 48± 5.76 | 60±10.42 | |
| 6.40 ± 0.04 | 7.5 ± 0.03 | 2.6 ± 0.41 | 11.9± 0,87 | 0.14 ±0.03 | 0.42 ± 0.08 | 57 ± 8.4 | 50 ± 8.87 | |
Values expressed as mean ± standard error of mean.
#p<0.01 as compared to control group
*p<0.05
**p<0.01 as compared to toxic control.
The comparisons were made by ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test
Fig 5Molecular interactions of Ursolic acid (Ball and Stick) with Cox-1(Blue Cartoon/Surface).
Fig 6Molecular interactions of Ursolic acid (Blue ball and stick) with Cox-2 (Red Cartoon/Surface).
Fig 7Effect of OLE loaded NLC gel in CFA induced arthritic rats (X-ray photographs).
A: Group-I. Normal control; B: Group-II. Toxic control; C: Group-III. OLE loaded NLC gel; D: Group-IV. Marketed gel.