Literature DB >> 29557991

The transcriptomic changes associated with the development of social parasitism in the honeybee Apis mellifera capensis.

Denise Aumer1, Fiona N Mumoki2, Christian W W Pirk2, Robin F A Moritz3,2,4.   

Abstract

Social insects are characterized by the division of labor. Queens usually dominate reproduction, whereas workers fulfill non-reproductive age-dependent tasks to maintain the colony. Although workers are typically sterile, they can activate their ovaries to produce their own offspring. In the extreme, worker reproduction can turn into social parasitism as in Apis mellifera capensis. These intraspecific parasites occupy a host colony, kill the resident queen, and take over the reproductive monopoly. Because they exhibit a queenlike behavior and are also treated like queens by the fellow workers, they are so-called pseudoqueens. Here, we compare the development of parasitic pseudoqueens and social workers at different time points using fat body transcriptome data. Two complementary analysis methods-a principal component analysis and a time course analysis-led to the identification of a core set of genes involved in the transition from a social worker into a highly fecund parasitic pseudoqueen. Comparing our results on pseudoqueens with gene expression data of honeybee queens revealed many similarities. In addition, there was a set of specific transcriptomic changes in the parasitic pseudoqueens that differed from both, queens and social workers, which may be typical for the development of the social parasitism in A. m. capensis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apis mellifera capensis; Pseudoqueen; Reproductive dominance; Social parasitism; Thelytoky; Worker reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29557991     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-018-1552-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  60 in total

1.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2.

Authors:  Ben Langmead; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  A honey bee odorant receptor for the queen substance 9-oxo-2-decenoic acid.

Authors:  Kevin W Wanner; Andrew S Nichols; Kimberly K O Walden; Axel Brockmann; Charles W Luetje; Hugh M Robertson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Regulation of hypopharyngeal gland activity and oogenesis in honey bee (Apis mellifera) workers.

Authors:  Jakob Wegener; Zachary Y Huang; Matthias W Lorenz; Kaspar Bienefeld
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 2.354

4.  LncRNAs have a say in protein translation.

Authors:  Maite Huarte
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 25.617

5.  Expression of vitellogenin and transferrin in activated ovaries of worker honey bees, Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Preeyada Koywiwattrakul; Siriporn Sittipraneed
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 1.890

6.  Control of reproductive dominance by the thelytoky gene in honeybees.

Authors:  H Michael G Lattorff; Robin F A Moritz; Robin M Crewe; Michel Solignac
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Sequence and expression characteristics of long noncoding RNAs in honey bee caste development--potential novel regulators for transgressive ovary size.

Authors:  Fernanda C Humann; Gustavo J Tiberio; Klaus Hartfelder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Simon Anders; Paul Theodor Pyl; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 9.  How do lncRNAs regulate transcription?

Authors:  Yicheng Long; Xueyin Wang; Daniel T Youmans; Thomas R Cech
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Transcriptome analyses of the honeybee response to Nosema ceranae and insecticides.

Authors:  Julie Aufauvre; Barbara Misme-Aucouturier; Bernard Viguès; Catherine Texier; Frédéric Delbac; Nicolas Blot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Inquiline social parasites as tools to unlock the secrets of insect sociality.

Authors:  Alessandro Cini; Seirian Sumner; Rita Cervo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Increased response to sequential infections of honeybee, Apis mellifera scutellata, colonies by socially parasitic Cape honeybee, A. m. capensis, workers.

Authors:  Peter Neumann; Christian W W Pirk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  A Single SNP Turns a Social Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Worker into a Selfish Parasite.

Authors:  Denise Aumer; Eckart Stolle; Michael Allsopp; Fiona Mumoki; Christian W W Pirk; Robin F A Moritz
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Comparative transcriptomic analysis of the mechanisms underpinning ageing and fecundity in social insects.

Authors:  Judith Korb; Karen Meusemann; Denise Aumer; Abel Bernadou; Daniel Elsner; Barbara Feldmeyer; Susanne Foitzik; Jürgen Heinze; Romain Libbrecht; Silu Lin; Megha Majoe; José Manuel Monroy Kuhn; Volker Nehring; Matteo A Negroni; Robert J Paxton; Alice C Séguret; Marah Stoldt; Thomas Flatt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 6.237

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.