Literature DB >> 29557816

Outcomes of Hemi-Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.

Rénuka S Birbal1,2,3, Shugi Hsien1,2, Vasiliki Zygoura1,2, Jack S Parker1,4, Lisanne Ham1,2,3, Korine van Dijk1,2, Isabel Dapena1,2, Lamis Baydoun1,2, Gerrit R J Melles1,2,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the mid-term outcomes of hemi-Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (hemi-DMEK) performed for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD).
METHODS: In this prospective, interventional case series, we evaluated clinical outcomes of 10 eyes from 10 patients who underwent hemi-DMEK for FECD. Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), central pachymetry, and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: At 1 year postoperatively, 7/7 eyes (excluding 2 eyes with low visual potential) reached a BCVA of ≥20/40 (≥0.5), 6/7 (86%) ≥20/25 (≥0.8), 4/7 (57%) ≥20/20 (≥1.0), and 2/7 (29%) 20/17 (≥1.2). BCVA remained stable until 2 years postoperatively (P ≥ 0.05) and further improved thereafter (P < 0.05). Mean ECD decreased from 2740 (±180) cells/mm preoperatively to 850 (±300) cells/mm (n = 9) at 1 year (P ≤ 0.05) and showed an annual decrease of on average 6% to 7% thereafter (P ≥ 0.05 between consecutive follow-ups). Pachymetry decreased from preoperatively 745 (±153) μm to 533 (±63) μm (n = 9) and 527 (±35) μm (n = 8) at 1 and 3 years postoperatively, respectively. Within the first 6 postoperative months, 4/10 eyes underwent rebubbling for visually significant graft detachment. One eye received secondary circular DMEK for persistent graft detachment 1 month postoperatively; another eye developed secondary graft failure 2.5 years postoperatively, and 1 eye was suspected for an allograft reaction 1.5 years postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Hemi-DMEK may render visual outcomes comparable to those achieved by conventional DMEK. Despite low ECD counts by 6 months, ECD levels remain fairly stable thereafter. Hence, hemi-DMEK may become a potential alternative technique for treatment of FECD while increasing the yield of the endothelial tissue pool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29557816     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  4 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of therapies for the corneal endothelium: past, present and future approaches.

Authors:  Hon Shing Ong; Marcus Ang; Jodhbir Mehta
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  New Horizons in the Treatment of Corneal Endothelial Dysfunction.

Authors:  Carlos Rocha-de-Lossada; Rahul Rachwani-Anil; Davide Borroni; José-María Sánchez-González; Raquel Esteves-Marques; Fernando-Luis Soler-Ferrández; Jose-Antonio Gegúndez-Fernández; Vito Romano; Eitan Livny; Marina Rodríguez Calvo-de-Mora
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): an update on safety, efficacy and patient selection.

Authors:  Bruno Lovaglio Cançado Trindade; Glauber Coutinho Eliazar
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-16

4.  Proliferation of Human Corneal Endothelia in Organ Culture Stimulated by Wounding and the Engineered Human Fibroblast Growth Factor 1 Derivative TTHX1114.

Authors:  David Eveleth; Sarah Pizzuto; Jessica Weant; Jennifer Jenkins-Eveleth; Ralph A Bradshaw
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 2.671

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.