Literature DB >> 29556725

Congenital glaucoma and CYP1B1: an old story revisited.

Hessa S Alsaif1, Arif O Khan1,2, Nisha Patel1, Hisham Alkuraya3, Mais Hashem1, Firdous Abdulwahab1, Niema Ibrahim1, Mohammed A Aldahmesh1, Fowzan S Alkuraya4,5,6.   

Abstract

Primary congenital glaucoma is a trabecular meshwork dysgenesis with resultant increased intraocular pressure and ocular damage. CYP1B1 mutations remain the most common identifiable genetic cause. However, important questions about the penetrance of CYP1B1-related congenital glaucoma remain unanswered. Furthermore, mutations in other genes have been described although their exact contribution and potential genetic interaction, if any, with CYP1B1 mutations are not fully explored. In this study, we employed modern genomic approaches to re-examine CYP1B1-related congenital glaucoma. A cohort of 193 patients (136 families) diagnosed with congenital glaucoma. We identified biallelic CYP1B1 mutations in 80.8% (87.5 and 66.1% in familial and sporadic cases, respectively, p < 0.0086). The large family size of the study population allowed us to systematically examine penetrance of all identified alleles. With the exception of c.1103G>A (p.R368H), previously reported pathogenic mutations were highly penetrant (91.2%). We conclude from the very low penetrance and genetic epidemiological analyses that c.1103G>A (p.R368H) is unlikely to be a disease-causing recessive mutation in congenital glaucoma as previously reported. All cases that lacked biallelic CYP1B1 mutations underwent whole exome sequencing. No mutations in LTBP2, MYOC or TEK were encountered. On the other hand, mutations were identified in genes linked to other ophthalmic phenotypes, some inclusive of glaucoma, highlighting conditions that might phenotypically overlap with primary congenital glaucoma (SLC4A4, SLC4A11, CPAMD8, and KERA). We also encountered candidate causal variants in genes not previously linked to human diseases: BCO2, TULP2, and DGKQ. Our results both expand and refine the genetic spectrum of congenital glaucoma with important clinical implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29556725     DOI: 10.1007/s00439-018-1878-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  6 in total

Review 1.  Animal Model Contributions to Primary Congenital Glaucoma.

Authors:  Qiongrong Xia; Dingding Zhang; Yue Zhuang; Yuqian Dai; Haiping Jia; Qiu Du; Taishen Wen; Yuanyuan Jiang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 1.974

2.  Linking Bisphenol S to Adverse Outcome Pathways Using a Combined Text Mining and Systems Biology Approach.

Authors:  Jean-Charles Carvaillo; Robert Barouki; Xavier Coumoul; Karine Audouze
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Uveitis and Multiple Sclerosis: Potential Common Causal Mutations.

Authors:  Alejandra de-la-Torre; Claudia T Silva-Aldana; Juliana Muñoz-Ortiz; Laura B Piñeros-Hernández; Oscar Otero; Alejandra Domínguez; León A Faciolince; Mauricio Arcos-Holzinger; Claudio Mastronardi; Nora Constanza Contreras-Bravo; Carlos Martín Restrepo; Mauricio Arcos-Burgos
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 5.590

4.  Compound Heterozygous Variants of the CPAMD8 Gene Co-Segregating in Two Chinese Pedigrees With Pigment Dispersion Syndrome/Pigmentary Glaucoma.

Authors:  Junkai Tan; Liuzhi Zeng; Yun Wang; Guo Liu; Longxiang Huang; Defu Chen; Xizhen Wang; Ning Fan; Yu He; Xuyang Liu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  The loss of microglia activities facilitates glaucoma progression in association with CYP1B1 gene mutation (p.Gly61Glu).

Authors:  Amani Alghamdi; Wadha Aldossary; Sarah Albahkali; Batoul Alotaibi; Bahauddeen M Alrfaei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Common disease-associated gene variants in a Saudi Arabian population.

Authors:  Mariam Aleissa; Taghrid Aloraini; Lamia Fahad Alsubaie; Madawi Hassoun; Ghada Abdulrahman; Abdulrahman Swaid; Wafa Al Eyaid; Fuad Al Mutairi; Faroug Ababneh; Majid Alfadhel; Ahmed Alfares
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 1.526

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.