| Literature DB >> 29556671 |
Francois Pognan1,2, J Andreas Mahl3, Maria Papoutsi3, David Ledieu3, Marc Raccuglia4, Diethilde Theil3, Sarah B Voytek5, Patrick J Devine5, Katie Kubek-Luck5, Natalie Claudio5, Andre Cordier3, Annabelle Heier3, Carine Kolly3, Andreas Hartmann3, Salah-Dine Chibout3, Page Bouchard5, Christian Trendelenburg3.
Abstract
A high incidence of hemangiosarcoma (HSA) was observed in mice treated for 2 years with siponimod, a sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1P1) functional antagonist, while no such tumors were observed in rats under the same treatment conditions. In 3-month rat (90 mg/kg/day) and 9-month mouse (25 and 75 mg/kg/day) in vivo mechanistic studies, vascular endothelial cell (VEC) activation was observed in both species, but VEC proliferation and persistent increases in circulating placental growth factor 2 (PLGF2) were only seen in the mouse. In mice, these effects were sustained over the 9-month study duration, while in rats increased mitotic gene expression was present at day 3 only and PLGF2 was induced only during the first week of treatment. In the mouse, the persistent VEC activation, mitosis induction, and PLGF2 stimulation likely led to sustained neo-angiogenesis which over life-long treatment may result in HSA formation. In rats, despite sustained VEC activation, the transient mitotic and PLGF2 stimuli did not result in the formation of HSA. In vitro, the mouse and rat primary endothelial cell cultures mirrored their respective in vivo findings for cell proliferation and PLGF2 release. Human VECs, like rat cells, were unresponsive to siponimod treatment with no proliferative response and no release of PLGF2 at all tested concentrations. Hence, it is suggested that the human cells also reproduce a lack of in vivo response to siponimod. In conclusion, the molecular mechanisms leading to siponimod-induced HSA in mice are considered species specific and likely irrelevant to humans.Entities:
Keywords: Hemangiosarcoma (HSA); Placental growth factor (PLGF2); Siponimod; Sphingosine-1-phosphate Receptor 1 (S1P1); Vascular endothelial cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29556671 PMCID: PMC5962627 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-018-2189-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Toxicol ISSN: 0340-5761 Impact factor: 5.153
Mean siponimod concentrations in mouse and rat plasma and tissues concentrations at various time points
| Rat | Mouse | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | Day 28 | Day 1 | Day 91 | Day 274 | ||||
| Dose mg/kg/day | 90 | 90 | 25 | 75 | 25 | 75 | 25 | 75 |
| Plasma Cmax | 22.3 | 16.6 | 18.2 | 50.3 | 26.5 | 53.6 | 13.5 | 35.6 |
| Liver | nd | 111 | nd | nd | 254 | 974 | 226 | 960 |
| Muscle | nd | 4.5 | nd | nd | 134 | 248 | 114 | 209 |
Values expressed in µM (approximating 1 g of tissue to 1 mL); n = 2 animals for rat and n = 5 animals for mice
nd not determined
Fig. 1Mouse skeletal muscle VEC gene activation expression. Circle: control, triangle: low dose, square: high dose. Each dot represents the gene signature of 1 animal. **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001 (homoscedastic t test). Dotted line represents the average of control values normalized to 1 from which fold changes were calculated for all individual animals. a Mouse skeletal muscle vascular endothelial cell activation signature time course. b Mouse skeletal muscle mitosis signature time course
Fig. 2Rat skeletal muscle gene expression. Circle: control, square: high dose. Each dot represents the gene signature of 1 animal. ****p < 0.0001 (homoscedastic t test). a Rat skeletal muscle vascular endothelial cell activation signature time course. b Rat skeletal muscle mitosis signature time course. Each dot represents endothelial vascular cell activation gene signature
Fig. 3Mouse Placental Growth Factor 2 (PLGF2). Circle: control, triangle: low dose, square: high dose. Each dot represents terminal plasma value of 1 animal. The 2 circled points highlight the 2 mice bearing HSA. **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001 (homoscedastic t test). Bar = Mean; error bar = 1 standard deviation
Fig. 4Rat Placental Growth Factor 2 (PLGF2). Circle: control, square: high dose. Bar = mean; error bar = 1 standard deviation. Horizontal-dotted line: LLoQ. Each dot represents terminal plasma value of 1 animal in part A, and same animals intermediate sampling values through time in part B. a PLGF2 terminal samples analyzed by Luminex multiplexed kit. b PLGF2 kinetics samples analyzed by ELISA
Fig. 5Siponimod-treated mouse skeletal muscle VECs. Assessment of cell proliferation and PLGF2 release of mouse muscle VECs treated with Siponimod expressed as percentage of control untreated cells (solid symbols: average of three independent experiments with triplicate points within each experiment; open symbols: single experiment with triplicate points within each experiment)
Fig. 6Siponimod-treated rat pulmonary (a) and aortic VECs (b). Assessment of cell proliferation and PLGF2 release of rat pulmonary (a) and aortic (b) VECs treated with Siponimod expressed as percentage of control untreated cells (average of two independent experiments with triplicate points within each experiment)
Fig. 7Siponimod-treated human dermal and pulmonary VECs. Assessment of cell proliferation and PLGF2 release of human dermal (a) and pulmonary (b) VECs treated with Siponimod expressed as percentage of control untreated cells (average of three (pulmonary VECs) and two (dermal VECs) independent experiments with triplicate points within each experiment)
Fig. 8Mouse versus rat Adverse Outcome Pathway plausible mechanism for HSA formation in the mouse. Although PLGF2 induction was observed earlier than the mitosis gene signature, it is unknown if one flows from the other, or if both independently arise from VEC activation. The fact that in the rat, PLGF2 induction outlasts mitosis would tend to advocate for two separate events