Literature DB >> 29556459

Iliac crest bone grafting for mandibular reconstruction: 10-year experience outcomes.

Timothy M Osborn1,2, Deeb Helal2, Pushkar Mehra1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate 10-year patient data related to mandibular reconstruction with NVBG at a tertiary academic center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with mandibular mandibular reconstruction were included. Patients were divided to continuity defect and non-continuity defect. Pathology lesion, immediate reconstruction, smoking habit, medical comorbidities, site and size of the defect, surgical approach, intraoperative perforation, cadaveric bone use, and maxilla-mandibular fixation use were analyzed as factors of influence on success. Success was defined as maintenance of more than 50% of graft for non-continuity defects (NCD) and bone continuity and stability for continuity defect (CD), and absence of infection on last follow up upon clinical and radiographic examination. Complications were classified as minor or major.
RESULTS: The reconstruction was successful in 28 (87%) of CD patients and 23 (82.1%) of NCD patients. Analyses showed that the size of defect was significantly associated with failure. All 4 failed cases of CD had defects more than 9 cm. Four patients had major complications and 43 minor complication.
CONCLUSIONS: Nonvascularized iliac crest bone grafts are highly successful in mandibular continuity reconstruction for non-Cancer patients and should be considered as first choice for defects less than 9 cm. They are less predictable for defects larger than 9 cm but can be considered in these cases with osteoconductive cribs. Symphysis involvement may or may not be associated with lower success rate if our protocol is followed.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29556459      PMCID: PMC5854560          DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2017.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res        ISSN: 2212-4268


  17 in total

1.  Surgical success of intraoral autogenous block onlay bone grafting for alveolar ridge augmentation.

Authors:  Devorah Schwartz-Arad; Liran Levin; Liat Sigal
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.454

Review 2.  Reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2: a note of caution in an atmosphere of exuberance.

Authors:  R Bryan Bell; Curtis Gregoire
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Part I. Mandibular reconstruction using vascularized bone grafts.

Authors:  M D Wells
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Part II. Mandibular reconstruction using cancellous cellular bone grafts.

Authors:  E R Carlson; R E Marx
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Reconstruction of mandibular discontinuity with autogenous iliac bone graft: report of 34 consecutive patients.

Authors:  K D Tidstrom; E E Keller
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  A comparison of vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafts for reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects.

Authors:  M A Pogrel; S Podlesh; J P Anthony; J Alexander
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Microvascular reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects without tracheostomy.

Authors:  Sami P Moubayed; Daniel A Barker; Ali Razfar; Vishad Nabili; Keith E Blackwell
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Mandibular ameloblastoma: analysis of surgical treatment carried out in 60 patients between 1977 and 1998.

Authors:  R Becelli; A Carboni; G Cerulli; Maurizio Perugini; G Iannetti
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.046

9.  Survey of oral rehabilitation in a consecutive series of 130 patients treated by primary resection for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  S N Rogers; J Panasar; K Pritchard; D Lowe; R Howell; J I Cawood
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.651

10.  An analysis of inadvertent perforations of mucosa and skin concurrent with mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Eric R Carlson; Kevin Monteleone
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.895

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Bone grafting materials in dentoalveolar reconstruction: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  S Titsinides; G Agrogiannis; T Karatzas
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2018-09-28

2.  Multiple Free Flap Reconstruction of a Complex Intraoral Defect after Squamous Cell Carcinoma Excision: A Case Report.

Authors:  Manlio Santilli; Gianmaria D'Addazio; Imena Rexhepi; Bruna Sinjari; Arnaldo Filippini
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 2.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.