Literature DB >> 29556393

Neoadjuvant brachytherapy and chemotherapy followed by radical surgery for stage IB2 and IIA cervical cancer: A retrospective comparison with chemoirradiation.

Hidehiro Tajima1, Mitsuyoshi Okazaki1, Takahisa Yamaguchi1, Yoshinao Ohbatake1, Koichi Okamoto1, Shinichi Nakanuma1, Shiro Terai1, Seisho Sakai1, Jun Kinoshita1, Isamu Makino1, Keishi Nakamura1, Hironori Hayashi1, Katsunobu Oyama1, Masafumi Inokuchi1, Tomoharu Miyashita1, Hiroyuki Takamura1, Itasu Ninomiya1, Sachio Fushida1, Tetsuo Ohta1.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess the immediate and long-term results of preoperative brachytherapy and chemotherapy followed by radical surgery compared with those of standard chemoirradiation in patients with stage IB2-IIA cervical cancer. The medical records of 70 patients with stage IB2 and IIA cervical cancer who were treated between June 2006 and June 2010 were reviewed. The patients received either standard chemoirradiation (CRT) treatment (n=20) or neoadjuvant brachytherapy with one cycle of chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy [operation (OT) group; n=50]. Further adjuvant chemoirradiation was administered to patients with high-risk disease. Early and late complications as well as survival were compared between the two groups. No serious operative complications occurred in the OT group. In the CRT group, the incidence of symptomatic vaginal stenosis, as well as that of proctitis and cystitis, was higher compared with that in the OT group (35 vs. 4% and 20 vs. 2%, repectively). The median follow-up period was 52 months (range, 11-84 months). In the CRT group, the 3-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 95% [95% confidence interval (CI): 76.14-86.46] and 90% (95% CI: 59.94-73.66), respectively, whereas in the OT group, the respective rates were 90% (95% CI: 72.93-83.07) and 90% (95% CI: 71.84-82.96). In conclusion, the survival of patients with stage IB2-IIA cervical cancer treated with preoperative brachytherapy and chemotherapy followed by radical surgery was similar to that of patients treated with chemoirradiation, but with a more favorable side effect profile. Thus, this tri-modal treatment option requires further evaluation in prospective randomized studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical cancer; complications; radical hysterectomy; radiotherapy; survival

Year:  2018        PMID: 29556393      PMCID: PMC5844013          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2018.1579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  4 in total

1.  MRI outcome evaluation in patients with IB2 and IIA2 squamous cervical cancer stages: preliminary results.

Authors:  Qingling Song; Huiting Pang; Rui Tong; Yanmei Zhu; Yahong Luo; Tao Yu; Fan Liu; Yue Dong
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-09-16

2.  Impact of bladder volume on treatment planning and clinical outcomes of radiotherapy for patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Shanshan Ma; Tingting Zhang; Li Jiang; Wen Qin; Keyu Lu; Yong Zhang; Rensheng Wang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  Neoadjuvant cisplatin and paclitaxel modulate tumor-infiltrating T cells in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  A Marijne Heeren; Iske F van Luijk; Joost Lakeman; Noëlle Pocorni; Jeroen Kole; Renée X de Menezes; Gemma G Kenter; Tjalling Bosse; Cornelis D de Kroon; Ekaterina S Jordanova
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 6.968

4.  Comparison of survival outcomes of neoadjuvant therapy and direct surgery in IB2/IIA2 cervical adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Peilin Ouyang; Jingting Cai; Lin Gui; Shan Liu; Na-Yi Yuan Wu; Jing Wang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 2.344

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.