| Literature DB >> 29556235 |
Gabrielle Bradshaw1, Robbie R Lualhati1, Cassie L Albury1, Neven Maksemous1, Deidre Roos-Araujo1, Robert A Smith1, Miles C Benton1, David A Eccles1, Rod A Lea1, Heidi G Sutherland1, Larisa M Haupt1, Lyn R Griffiths1.
Abstract
Background: We investigated the molecular etiology of a young male proband with confirmed immunodeficiency of unknown cause, presenting with recurrent bacterial and Varicella zoster viral infections in childhood and persistent lymphopenia into early adulthood. Aim: To identify causative functional genetic variants related to an undiagnosed primary immunodeficiency. Method: Whole genome microarray copy number variant (CNV) analysis was performed on the proband followed by whole exome sequencing (WES) and trio analysis of the proband and family members. A >4 kbp deletion identified by repeated CNV analysis of exome sequencing data along with three damaging missense single nucleotide variants were validated by Sanger sequencing in all family members. Confirmation of the causative role of the candidate gene was performed by qPCR and Western Blot analyses on the proband, family members and a healthy control.Entities:
Keywords: MSN; X-linked moesin-associated immunodeficiency; lymphopenia; moesin; whole exome sequencing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29556235 PMCID: PMC5845094 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00420
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Hematology laboratory workup for the proband.
| Hematology | June 28, 2001 | June 17, 2004 | June 14, 2005 | Units | Ref interval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at evaluation | 8 years | 11 years | 12 years | 6–12 years | |
| Hemoglobin | 118 | 127 | 127 | g/L | 110–15 |
| Hematocrit | 0.34 | 0.36 | 0.37 | 0.36–0.46 | |
| Red cell count | – | 4.3 | 4.5 | ×1012/L | 4.0–5.6 |
| Mean cell volume | 87 | 84 | 84 | fL | 77–95 |
| White cell count | 2.4 | 2.5 | 3.4 | ×109/L | 5.0–12.0 |
| Neutrophils | 2.04 | 2.00 | 2.67 | ×109/L | 1.5–7.5 |
| Lymphocytes | 0.32 | 0.40 | 0.52 | ×109/L | 1.0–6.5 |
| Monocytes | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.11 | ×109/L | 0–1.5 |
| Eosinophils | – | 0.00 | 0.05 | ×109/L | 0–0.6 |
| Basophils | – | 0.00 | 0.01 | ×109/L | 0–0.20 |
| Platelets | 363 | 329 | 401 | ×109/L | 150–600 |
| Lymphocyte subsets | |||||
| Lymphocytes | 370 | ND | ND | Cells/μL | 1,900–3,700 |
| T-cells CD3+ | 74 | ND | ND | Cells/μL | 600–2,600 |
| T-helper CD4+ | 33 | ND | ND | Cells/μL | 650–1,500 |
| T suppressor CD8+ | 33 | ND | ND | Cells/μL | 370–1,100 |
| B-cells CD19+ | 15 | ND | ND | Cells/μL | 270–860 |
| NK cells CD16+/56+ | 3 | ND | ND | Cells/μL | 4–20 |
| TRECs | <100,000 | ND | ND | Per million PBMC | 100,000 |
| Protein studies | |||||
| Immunoglobulin G (IgG) on IVIg | 805 | ND | ND | mg/dL | 520–1,098 |
| Immunoglobulin A (IgA) | 16 | ND | ND | mg/dL | 36–230 |
| Immunoglobulin M (IgM) | 30 | ND | ND | mg/dL | 42–172 |
Historical hematology workup showing persistent leucopenia with lymphopenia and hypogammaglobulinemia at 8, 11, and 12 years of age. Neutropenia improved with G-CSF treatment.
PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; IVIg, intravenous immunoglobulin; ND, not determined.
Red font indicates values lower than the reference interval.
Hematology laboratory workup for the proband.
| Hematology | December 16, 2016 | July 04, 2017 | Units | Ref interval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at evaluation | 23 years | 24 years | >12 years | |
| Hemoglobin | 138 | 142 | g/L | 135–175 |
| Hematocrit | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.40–0.54 | |
| Red cell count | 4.8 | 4.9 | ×1012/L | 4.5–6.5 |
| Mean cell volume | 87 | 84 | fL | 80–100 |
| White cell count | 1.5 | 1.3 | ×109/L | 3.5–10.0 |
| Neutrophils | 0.96 | 0.74 | ×109/L | 1.5–6.5 |
| Lymphocytes | 0.46 | 0.47 | ×109/L | 1.0–4.0 |
| Monocytes | 0.06 | 0.08 | ×109/L | 0–0.9 |
| Eosinophils | 0.00 | 0.00 | ×109/L | 0–0.6 |
| Basophils | 0.01 | 0.02 | ×109/L | 0–0.15 |
| Platelets | 316 | 255 | ×109/L | 150–400 |
| Lymphocyte subsets | 0.46 | ND | ×109/L | 1.0–4.0 |
| T-cells CD3+ | 0.43 | ND | ×109/L | 0.75–2.50 |
| T-helper CD4+ | 0.15 | ND | ×109/L | 0.50–1.90 |
| T suppressor CD8+ | 0.24 | ND | ×109/L | 0.21–1.2 |
| B-cells CD19+ | 0.01 | ND | ×109/L | 0.05–0.60 |
| NK cells CD16+/56+ | 0.02 | ND | ×109/L | 0.05–0.60 |
| Protein studies | ||||
| Immunoglobulin G (IgG) on IVIg | 9.15 | 6.98 | g/L | 5.76–15.36 |
| Immunoglobulin A (IgA) | 0.49 | 0.45 | g/L | 1.24–4.16 |
| Immunoglobulin M (IgM) | 0.13 | 0.21 | g/L | 0.48–3.1 |
Current hematology results showing persistent leucopenia with neutropenia, lymphopenia, and hypogammaglobulinemia at 23 and 24 years of age. Peripheral blood lymphocyte surface markers shows all lymphocyte subsets are below the normal range excluding T suppressor CD8+ cells which are on the lower level of normal.
IVIg, intravenous immunoglobulin; ND, not determined.
Red font indicates values lower than the reference interval.
Whole exome trio analysis data filtering and in silico prediction tools (SIFT, PolyPhen, Grantham Score, and MutationTaster) identified three damaging and disease-causing SNVs in the proband: MSN C > T, TET2 C > T, and NLRP8 A > C.
| Gene | Locus (Hg19) | dbSNP/transcripts | Nucleotide change | MAF | Proband genotype | Variant effect | Amino acid change | SIFT | PolyPhen | Grantham score | Mutation taster |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChrX:64951012 | Novel mutationNM_002444 | c.511C > T | n/a | T/– | Missense | p.Arg171Trp | 0 | 1 | 101 | Disease-causing | |
| Hemizygous X-linked | AA change | Basic to non-polar residue change | Damaging | Damaging | Radical amino acid change | ||||||
| Chr4:106155199 | rs111948941 | c.100C > T | T = 0.015 (dbSNP) | T/T | Missense | p.Leu34Phe | 0 | 0.5 | 22 | Disease-causing | |
| Homozygous Recessive | AA change | Both residues are non-polar | Damaging | Possibly damaging | Conservative AA change | ||||||
| Chr19:56467265 | c.1841A > C | C = < 1/10,000 (gnomAD) | A/C | Missense | p.His614Pro | 0 | > 0.8 | 77 | Polymorphic, minor allele frequency; Hg19, GRCh37 reference genome.ly-morphic | ||
| Heterozygous | AA change | Basic to non-polar residue change | Damaging | Damaging | Non-conservative AA change | ||||||
MAF, minor allele frequency; Hg19, GRCh37 reference genome.
Red font highlights significant damaging and disease-causing prediction scores.
Figure 1Validation of the R171WMSN mutation in family members. (A) Sanger sequence and pedigree tree diagram for the missense MSN C > T mutation. P, proband; F, father; M, mother; S, sister. Mother is heterozygous C/T marked by a double blue and red peak and proband is hemizygous –/T marked by a single red peak. (B) IGV software showing MSN genotypes for the mother (C/T), proband (–T), and father (C/C), respectively. IGV, integrative genomics viewer.
Figure 2MSN protein detection and MSN gene expression. (A) Western Blot shows absence of the 68 kDa moesin protein in the MCF-7 cell line (negative control, lane 3) and in the proband (lane 6), and presence of moesin in the healthy control subject (lane 1), Toledo B-cell line (positive control, lane 2), father (lane 4), and mother (lane 5). Beta-actin (42 kDa) was used as the loading control. (B) Optical density protein quantitation software showed very low levels of moesin (<0.5 μg) in the MCF-7 cells and the proband, confirming a moesin deficiency. (C) qPCR analysis of MSN mRNA transcript levels in whole blood (PAXgene) from the control subject, father, mother and proband. Error bars depict standard error of the mean (SEM) between triplicates. (D) qPCR analysis of MSN mRNA transcript levels in lymphocytes from the control subject, father, mother, and case. Error bars depict SEM between triplicates.
Comparison of clinical outcomes for cases P1–P7 (Lagresle-Peyrou et al.) and the proband.
| Case | Bacterial infections | Varicella zoster | Eczema | Autoimmunity | Persistent lymphopenia | Fluctuating neutropenia | IgG therapy | Improvement with G-CSF | Alive and well | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | R171W | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No G-CSF | Yes |
| P2 | R171W | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| R171W | Yes | Yes | No | No | TTP | Yes | Yes | Yes | No GCS-F | Yes | |
| P4 | R171W | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| P5 | R171W | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No G-CSF | Yes |
| P6 | R171W | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No G-CSF | Yes |
| P7 | R553* | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No G-CSF | Yes |
| R171W | Yes | Yes | No | No | ITP | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Red font highlights similarities between case P3 and proband.