Literature DB >> 29555833

Comparison of Cardiac Computed Tomography With Transesophageal Echocardiography for Identifying Vegetation and Intracardiac Complications in Patients With Infective Endocarditis in the Era of 3-Dimensional Images.

In-Cheol Kim1, Suyon Chang1, Geu-Ru Hong1, Seung Hyun Lee1, Sak Lee1, Jong-Won Ha1, Byung-Chul Chang1, Young Jin Kim2, Chi Young Shim2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent evolution of cardiac computed tomography (CT) provides useful information about valvular and perivalvular structures. We compared the diagnostic performance of CT and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) with applications of 3-dimensional reconstruction in detecting vegetation and intracardiac complications in patients with infective endocarditis (IE). METHODS AND
RESULTS: Seventy-five patients (53 men; age, 58±15 years) with definite IE who underwent TEE and CT with 3-dimensional reconstruction within 3 days were analyzed. The diagnostic performances of the 2 modalities for vegetation and IE-related intracardiac complications (valve perforation, valve aneurysm, perivalvular abscess, pseudoaneurysm, fistula, and prosthetic valve dehiscence) were compared. The detection rate of vegetation in TEE and CT was 97.3% and 72.0%, respectively. The maximum sizes of vegetation identified by TEE and CT were well correlated (r=0.593; P<0.001), especially in patients with large vegetation (≥10 mm), suggestive of a high risk of systemic embolism (r=0.608; P<0.001). However, small vegetation (<10 mm) was underdiagnosed by CT (52.8%) compared with TEE (94.4%), and the sizes of the 2 modalities were poorly correlated (r=0.187; P=0.445). Both modalities showed fair diagnostic performance for detecting IE-related intracardiac complications with excellent agreement. TEE was more useful for diagnosing valve perforation and intracardiac fistula, whereas CT was better for diagnosing perivalvular abscess.
CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac CT shows a comparable diagnostic performance with TEE for large vegetation and several IE-related complications. TEE is better for detecting small vegetation, valve perforation, and intracardiac fistula, whereas CT is more useful for detecting perivalvular abscess and coronary artery disease.
© 2018 American Heart Association, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  echocardiography; endocarditis; humans; imaging, three-dimensional

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29555833     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.006986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1941-9651            Impact factor:   7.792


  5 in total

1.  Comparative Value of Cardiac CT and Transesophageal Echocardiography in Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Magno Oliveira; Lydia Guittet; Martial Hamon; Michèle Hamon
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2020-06-18

Review 2.  Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography vs transoesophageal echocardiography for infective endocarditis - A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liqin Jing; Yanchun Song
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

Review 3.  Endocarditis in Patients with Aortic Valve Prosthesis: Comparison between Surgical and Transcatheter Prosthesis.

Authors:  Micaela De Palo; Pietro Scicchitano; Pietro Giorgio Malvindi; Domenico Paparella
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-06

Review 4.  Cardiac Computed Tomography in Cardio-Oncology: JACC: CardioOncology Primer.

Authors:  Juan C Lopez-Mattei; Eric H Yang; Maros Ferencik; Lauren A Baldassarre; Susan Dent; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  JACC CardioOncol       Date:  2021-12-21

5.  Repeat transesophageal echocardiography in infective endocarditis: An analysis of contemporary utilization.

Authors:  Aylin Shafiyi; Nandan S Anavekar; Abinash Virk; M Rizwan Sohail; Brian D Lahr; Daniel C DeSimone; Walter R Wilson; Larry M Baddour
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 1.874

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.