Literature DB >> 29555799

From axiomatics of quantum probability to modelling geological uncertainty and management of intelligent hydrocarbon reservoirs with the theory of open quantum systems.

Miguel Ángel Lozada Aguilar1, Andrei Khrennikov2, Klaudia Oleschko3.   

Abstract

As was recently shown by the authors, quantum probability theory can be used for the modelling of the process of decision-making (e.g. probabilistic risk analysis) for macroscopic geophysical structures such as hydrocarbon reservoirs. This approach can be considered as a geophysical realization of Hilbert's programme on axiomatization of statistical models in physics (the famous sixth Hilbert problem). In this conceptual paper, we continue development of this approach to decision-making under uncertainty which is generated by complexity, variability, heterogeneity, anisotropy, as well as the restrictions to accessibility of subsurface structures. The belief state of a geological expert about the potential of exploring a hydrocarbon reservoir is continuously updated by outputs of measurements, and selection of mathematical models and scales of numerical simulation. These outputs can be treated as signals from the information environment E The dynamics of the belief state can be modelled with the aid of the theory of open quantum systems: a quantum state (representing uncertainty in beliefs) is dynamically modified through coupling with E; stabilization to a steady state determines a decision strategy. In this paper, the process of decision-making about hydrocarbon reservoirs (e.g. 'explore or not?'; 'open new well or not?'; 'contaminated by water or not?'; 'double or triple porosity medium?') is modelled by using the Gorini-Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad equation. In our model, this equation describes the evolution of experts' predictions about a geophysical structure. We proceed with the information approach to quantum theory and the subjective interpretation of quantum probabilities (due to quantum Bayesianism).This article is part of the theme issue 'Hilbert's sixth problem'.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hilbert's sixth problem; decision-making and risk analysis; geology; heterogeneity; open quantum systems; quantum versus classical Bayesian inference

Year:  2018        PMID: 29555799      PMCID: PMC5869538          DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  4 in total

1.  Fractal radar scattering from soil.

Authors:  Klaudia Oleschko; Gabor Korvin; Benjamin Figueroa; Marco Antonio Vuelvas; Alexander S Balankin; Lourdes Flores; Dora Carreón
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2003-04-30

2.  Quantum Bayesianism as the basis of general theory of decision-making.

Authors:  Andrei Khrennikov
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Quantum Bayesian perspective for intelligence reservoir characterization, monitoring and management.

Authors:  Miguel Ángel Lozada Aguilar; Andrei Khrennikov; Klaudia Oleschko; María de Jesús Correa
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Quantum-like model of unconscious-conscious dynamics.

Authors:  Andrei Khrennikov
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-03
  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Hilbert's sixth problem: the endless road to rigour.

Authors:  A N Gorban
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 4.226

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.