Literature DB >> 29554998

Contribution of the Breadth and Depth of IACUC Membership to Experimental Design as a Factor in Research Reproducibility.

Swapna Mohan1, Robert W Barbee2, Susan B Silk3.   

Abstract

The IACUC comprises the key component of animal research oversight at any institution or facility and thus has the responsibility to review and approve proposed animal activities. As the primary oversight unit that ensures the quality of animal welfare and therefore contributes to overall research quality, the IACUC can support reproducibility in research by ensuring rigorous experimental design, standardization of care and management, and assessment of the validity of research. An IACUC that is constituted as required by the Animal Welfare Act and the PHS Policy incorporates a wide range of expertise. Here we explore the contributions of the various IACUC members and discuss how each can help to enhance rigor and mitigate issues regarding irreproducibility in biomedical research involving animals.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29554998      PMCID: PMC5868375     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  27 in total

1.  Scientific merit review: the role of the IACUC.

Authors:  Ernest D Prentice; David A Crouse; Michael D Mann
Journal:  Ilar News       Date:  1992 Winter-Spring

2.  Laboratory animal welfare; U.S. government principles for the utilization and care of vertebrate animals used in testing, research and training; notice.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  1985-05-20

Review 3.  Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review.

Authors:  Pablo Perel; Ian Roberts; Emily Sena; Philipa Wheble; Catherine Briscoe; Peter Sandercock; Malcolm Macleod; Luciano E Mignini; Pradeep Jayaram; Khalid S Khan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-12-15

4.  Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws.

Authors:  Bruce Alberts; Marc W Kirschner; Shirley Tilghman; Harold Varmus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Design, power, and interpretation of studies in the standard murine model of ALS.

Authors:  Sean Scott; Janice E Kranz; Jeff Cole; John M Lincecum; Kenneth Thompson; Nancy Kelly; Alan Bostrom; Jill Theodoss; Bashar M Al-Nakhala; Fernando G Vieira; Jeyanthi Ramasubbu; James A Heywood
Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler       Date:  2008

6.  Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Lawrence A Tabak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Sander Greenland; Mark A Hlatky; Muin J Khoury; Malcolm R Macleod; David Moher; Kenneth F Schulz; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  The assessment of post-vasectomy pain in mice using behaviour and the Mouse Grimace Scale.

Authors:  Matthew C Leach; Kristel Klaus; Amy L Miller; Maud Scotto di Perrotolo; Susana G Sotocinal; Paul A Flecknell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effects of vendor and genetic background on the composition of the fecal microbiota of inbred mice.

Authors:  Aaron C Ericsson; J Wade Davis; William Spollen; Nathan Bivens; Scott Givan; Catherine E Hagan; Mark McIntosh; Craig L Franklin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The multifactorial role of the 3Rs in shifting the harm-benefit analysis in animal models of disease.

Authors:  Melanie L Graham; Mark J Prescott
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 4.432

View more
  1 in total

1.  Statistics, statistical thinking, and the IACUC.

Authors:  Penny Reynolds
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 12.625

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.