Literature DB >> 29554436

Biomechanical Evaluation of the Medial Stabilizers of the Patella.

Matthew D LaPrade1, Samantha L Kallenbach1, Zachary S Aman1, Gilbert Moatshe1,2,3, Hunter W Storaci1, Travis Lee Turnbull1, Elizabeth A Arendt4, Jorge Chahla1, Robert F LaPrade1,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quantification of the biomechanical properties of each individual medial patellar ligament will facilitate an understanding of injury patterns and enhance anatomic reconstruction techniques by improving the selection of grafts possessing appropriate biomechanical properties for each ligament.
PURPOSE: To determine the ultimate failure load, stiffness, and mechanism of failure of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL), and medial patellomeniscal ligament (MPML) to assist with selection of graft tissue for anatomic reconstructions. STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study.
METHODS: Twenty-two nonpaired, fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were dissected free of all soft tissue structures except for the MPFL, MPTL, and MPML. Two specimens were ultimately excluded because their medial structure fibers were lacerated during dissection. The patella was obliquely cut to test the MPFL and the MPTL-MPML complex separately. To ensure that the common patellar insertion of the MPTL and MPML was not compromised during testing, only one each of the MPML and MPTL were tested per specimen (n = 10 each). Specimens were secured in a dynamic tensile testing machine, and the ultimate load, stiffness, and mechanism of failure of each ligament (MPFL = 20, MPML = 10, and MPTL = 10) were recorded.
RESULTS: The mean ± SD ultimate load of the MPFL (178 ± 46 N) was not significantly greater than that of the MPTL (147 ± 80 N; P = .706) but was significantly greater than that of the MPML (105 ± 62 N; P = .001). The mean ultimate load of the MPTL was not significantly different from that of the MPML ( P = .210). Of the 20 MPFLs tested, 16 failed by midsubstance rupture and 4 by bony avulsion on the femur. Of the 10 MPTLs tested, 9 failed by midsubstance rupture and 1 by bony avulsion on the patella. Finally, of the 10 MPMLs tested, all 10 failed by midsubstance rupture. No significant difference was found in mean stiffness between the MPFL (23 ± 6 N/mm2) and the MPTL (31 ± 21 N/mm2; P = .169), but a significant difference was found between the MPFL and the MPML (14 ± 8 N/mm2; P = .003) and between the MPTL and MPML ( P = .028).
CONCLUSION: The MPFL and MPTL had comparable ultimate loads and stiffness, while the MPML had lower failure loads and stiffness. Midsubstance failure was the most common type of failure; therefore, reconstruction grafts should meet or exceed the values reported herein. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: For an anatomic medial-sided knee reconstruction, the individual biomechanical contributions of the medial patellar ligamentous structures (MPFL, MPTL, and MPML) need to be characterized to facilitate an optimal reconstruction design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanics; medial patellar ligaments; medial patellar stabilizers; patellofemoral

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29554436     DOI: 10.1177/0363546518758654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of recurrent dislocation of the patella in children with MRI: Goldthwait technique combined with lateral release, and VMO advancement-a retrospective study of 85 knees.

Authors:  P Megremis; O Megremis
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2021-05-23

2.  A new device for patellofemoral instrumented stress-testing provides good reliability and validity.

Authors:  Ana Leal; Renato Andrade; Betina B Hinckel; Marc Tompkins; Paulo Flores; Filipe Silva; João Espregueira-Mendes; Elizabeth Arendt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction significantly improved quality of life in patients with recurrent patella dislocation.

Authors:  Theodoros Bouras; Edmond U; Ashley Brown; Peter Gallacher; Andrew Barnett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Recognition of evolving medial patellofemoral anatomy provides insight for reconstruction.

Authors:  Miho J Tanaka; Jorge Chahla; Jack Farr; Robert F LaPrade; Elizabeth A Arendt; Vicente Sanchis-Alfonso; William R Post; John P Fulkerson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Concomitant Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction and Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy Do Not Increase the Incidence of 30-Day Complications: An Analysis of the NSQIP Database.

Authors:  Avinesh Agarwalla; Anirudh K Gowd; Joseph N Liu; Richard N Puzzitiello; Adam B Yanke; Nikhil N Verma; Brian Forsythe
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-04-12

Review 6.  Proximal medial patellar restraints and their surgical reconstruction.

Authors:  Paolo Ferrua; Bradley M Kruckeberg; Stefano Pasqualotto; Massimo Berruto; Pietro Randelli; Elizabeth A Arendt
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2019-03-26

7.  Combined Soft Tissue Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament and Medial Quadriceps Tendon-Femoral Ligament.

Authors:  João Espregueira-Mendes; Renato Andrade; Ricardo Bastos; Sheeba Joseph; John P Fulkerson; Luís Duarte Silva
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2019-04-17

8.  Interference Screw Versus Suture Anchors for Femoral Fixation in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Heath P Gould; Nicholas R Delaney; Brent G Parks; Roshan T Melvani; Richard Y Hinton
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-08

9.  Medial Patellofemoral Reconstruction Using Quadriceps Tendon Autograft, Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy, and Sulcus-Deepening Trochleoplasty for Patellar Instability.

Authors:  Edward R Floyd; Nicholas J Ebert; Gregory B Carlson; Jill K Monson; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2021-04-12

10.  Increased external tibial torsion is an infratuberositary deformity and is not correlated with a lateralized position of the tibial tuberosity.

Authors:  Philipp W Winkler; Patricia M Lutz; Marco C Rupp; Florian B Imhoff; Kaywan Izadpanah; Andreas B Imhoff; Matthias J Feucht
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.