| Literature DB >> 29554243 |
Vincent Auffret1, Yves Cottin2, Guillaume Leurent1, Martine Gilard3, Jean-Claude Beer2, Amer Zabalawi4, Frédéric Chagué2, Emanuelle Filippi5, Damien Brunet6, Jean-Philippe Hacot7, Philippe Brunel6, Mourad Mejri8, Luc Lorgis2, Gilles Rouault9, Philippes Druelles10, Jean-Christophe Cornily11, Romain Didier3, Emilie Bot12, Bertrand Boulanger13, Isabelle Coudert14, Aurélie Loirat1, Marc Bedossa1, Dominique Boulmier1, Maud Maza2, Marielle Le Guellec1, Rishi Puri1, Marianne Zeller15, Hervé Le Breton1.
Abstract
Aims: To derive and validate a readily useable risk score to identify patients at high-risk of in-hospital ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-related cardiogenic shock (CS). Methods and results: In all, 6838 patients without CS on admission and treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI), included in the Observatoire Régional Breton sur l'Infarctus (ORBI), served as a derivation cohort, and 2208 patients included in the obseRvatoire des Infarctus de Côte-d'Or (RICO) constituted the external validation cohort. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression was used to build the score. Eleven variables were independently associated with the development of in-hospital CS: age >70 years, prior stroke/transient ischaemic attack, cardiac arrest upon admission, anterior STEMI, first medical contact-to-pPCI delay >90 min, Killip class, heart rate >90/min, a combination of systolic blood pressure <125 mmHg and pulse pressure <45 mmHg, glycaemia >10 mmol/L, culprit lesion of the left main coronary artery, and post-pPCI thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade <3. The score derived from these variables allowed the classification of patients into four risk categories: low (0-7), low-to-intermediate (8-10), intermediate-to-high (11-12), and high (≥13). Observed in-hospital CS rates were 1.3%, 6.6%, 11.7%, and 31.8%, across the four risk categories, respectively. Validation in the RICO cohort demonstrated in-hospital CS rates of 3.1% (score 0-7), 10.6% (score 8-10), 18.1% (score 11-12), and 34.1% (score ≥13). The score demonstrated high discrimination (c-statistic of 0.84 in the derivation cohort, 0.80 in the validation cohort) and adequate calibration in both cohorts.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29554243 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy127
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Heart J ISSN: 0195-668X Impact factor: 29.983