Literature DB >> 29554234

A computational analysis of different endograft designs for Zone 0 aortic arch repair.

Theodorus M van Bakel1,2,3, Christopher J Arthurs4, Joost A van Herwaarden3, Frans L Moll3, Kim A Eagle5, Himanshu J Patel6, Santi Trimarchi2, C Alberto Figueroa1,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Aortic arch repair remains a major surgical challenge. Multiple manufacturers are developing branched endografts for Zone 0 endovascular repair, extending the armamentarium for minimally invasive treatment of aortic arch pathologies. We hypothesize that the design of the Zone 0 endograft has a significant impact on the postoperative haemodynamic performance, particularly in the cervical arteries. The goal of our study was to compare the postoperative haemodynamic performance of different Zone 0 endograft designs.
METHODS: Patient-specific, clinically validated, computational fluid dynamics simulations were performed in a 71-year-old woman with a 6.5-cm saccular aortic arch aneurysm. Additionally, 4 endovascular repair scenarios using different endograft designs were created. Haemodynamic performance was evaluated by calculation of postoperative changes in blood flow and platelet activation potential (PLAP) in the cervical arteries.
RESULTS: Preoperative cervical blood flow and mean PLAP were 1080 ml/min and 151.75, respectively. Cervical blood flow decreased and PLAP increased following endovascular repair in all scenarios. Endografts with 2 antegrade inner branches performed better compared to single-branch endografts. Scenario 3 performed the worst with a decrease in the total cervical blood flow of 4.8%, a decrease in the left hemisphere flow of 6.7% and an increase in the mean PLAP of 74.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: Endograft design has a significant impact on haemodynamic performance following Zone 0 endovascular repair, potentially affecting cerebral blood flow during follow-up. Our results demonstrate the use of computational modelling for virtual testing of therapeutic interventions and underline the need to monitor the long-term outcomes in this cohort of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29554234     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  9 in total

1.  Cardiac remodelling following thoracic endovascular aortic repair for descending aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Theodorus M J van Bakel; Christopher J Arthurs; Foeke J H Nauta; Kim A Eagle; Joost A van Herwaarden; Frans L Moll; Santi Trimarchi; Himanshu J Patel; C Alberto Figueroa
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Ascending aortic rupture after zone 2 endovascular repair: a multiparametric computational analysis.

Authors:  Theodorus M J van Bakel; Nicholas S Burris; Himanshu J Patel; C Alberto Figueroa
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  Status of branched endovascular aortic arch repair.

Authors:  Theodorus M van Bakel; Hector W de Beaufort; Santi Trimarchi; Massimiliano M Marrocco-Trischitta; Jean Bismuth; Frans L Moll; Himanshu J Patel; Joost A van Herwaarden
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-05

4.  Patient-specific computational fluid dynamics analysis of transcatheter aortic root replacement with chimney coronary grafts.

Authors:  Michele Conti; Rodrigo M Romarowski; Anna Ferrarini; Matteo Stochino; Ferdinando Auricchio; Simone Morganti; Ludwig Karl von Segesser; Enrico Ferrari
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-08

5.  Functional Evaluation of Embedded Modular Single-Branched Stent Graft: Application to Type B Aortic Dissection With Aberrant Right Subclavian Artery.

Authors:  Xuehuan Zhang; Duanduan Chen; Mingwei Wu; Huiwu Dong; Zhengdong Wan; Heyue Jia; Shichao Liang; Jun Shao; Jun Zheng; Shangdong Xu; Jiang Xiong; Wei Guo
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-02

6.  A nonlinear rotation-free shell formulation with prestressing for vascular biomechanics.

Authors:  Nitesh Nama; Miquel Aguirre; Jay D Humphrey; C Alberto Figueroa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Interventional Planning for Endovascular Revision of a Lateral Tunnel Fontan: A Patient-Specific Computational Analysis.

Authors:  Yunus Ahmed; Christopher Tossas-Betancourt; Pieter A J van Bakel; Jonathan M Primeaux; William J Weadock; Jimmy C Lu; Jeffrey D Zampi; Arash Salavitabar; C Alberto Figueroa
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Haemodynamic Analysis of Branched Endografts for Complex Aortic Arch Repair.

Authors:  Sampad Sengupta; Mohamad Hamady; Xiao-Yun Xu
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-18

9.  Patient-specific computational flow modelling for assessing hemodynamic changes following fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Kenneth Tran; Weiguang Yang; Alison Marsden; Jason T Lee
Journal:  JVS Vasc Sci       Date:  2021-03-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.