Literature DB >> 29553940

Benefit of a new provisional stenting strategy, the re-proximal optimisation technique: the rePOT clinical study.

François Dérimay1, Gérard Finet, Geraud Souteyrand, Luc Maillard, Adel Aminian, Benoit Lattuca, Guillaume Cayla, Guillaume Cellier, Pascal Motreff, Gilles Rioufol.   

Abstract

AIMS: A new coronary bifurcation provisional stenting technique without kissing balloon, rePOT, associating the proximal optimisation technique (POT), side branch inflation and final POT, showed excellent mechanical results in a bench test. The present study sought to use optical coherence tomography (OCT) to quantify the mechanical results of rePOT in vivo in a large patient sample with complex coronary bifurcations. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 106 patients with coronary bifurcations were included in a multicentre prospective registry (left main, 40.6%; true Medina bifurcation, 39.6%). Three OCT runs were performed, at baseline, just after stent implantation and after the complete rePOT sequence, quantifying global malapposition, side branch obstruction (SBO), and various geometric arterial criteria. RePOT was completed systematically. RePOT significantly reduced global strut malapposition from 18.9±13.4% just after stent implantation to 3.2±3.9% (p<0.05), residual SBO from 44.3±12.9% to 17.0±14.3% (p<0.05), and ellipticity index from 1.19±0.11 to 1.13±0.12 (p<0.05). Exhaustive six-month follow-up found only one mother-vessel target lesion revascularisation.
CONCLUSIONS: This clinical study of a large sample of complex coronary bifurcations with OCT analysis showed the benefit of the rePOT sequence in provisional stenting, replicating in vivo the excellent in vitro geometric results previously reported, and confirming ease of implementation and medium-term safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29553940     DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  8 in total

1.  European Bifurcation Club white paper on stenting techniques for patients with bifurcated coronary artery lesions.

Authors:  Francesco Burzotta; Jens Flensted Lassen; Yves Louvard; Thierry Lefèvre; Adrian P Banning; Olivier Daremont; Manuel Pan; David Hildick-Smith; Alaide Chieffo; Yiannis S Chatzizisis; Vladimír Džavík; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon; Yutaka Hikichi; Yoshinobu Murasato; Bon Kwon Koo; Shao-Liang Chen; Patrick Serruys; Goran Stankovic
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Randomized non-inferiority TrIal comParing reverse T And Protrusion versus double-kissing and crush Stenting for the treatment of complex left main bifurcation lesions.

Authors:  Maximilian Olschewski; Helen Ullrich; Maike Knorr; Giulio Makmur; Majid Ahoopai; Thomas Münzel; Tommaso Gori
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 6.138

3.  Crush versus Culotte stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  En Chen; Wei Cai; Liang-Long Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention of left main trunk treated using a proximal optimizing technique and proximal balloon edge dilation technique.

Authors:  Teruyoshi Kume; Satoshi Koto; Yasuyuki Sudo; Okamoto Hiroshi; Ryotaro Yamada; Koichiro Imai; Terumasa Koyama; Tomoko Tamada; Yoji Neishi; Shiro Uemura
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2021-07-03

Review 5.  Fundamentals of percutaneous coronary bifurcation interventions.

Authors:  Tamer Kırat
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-26

6.  Critical aspects of balloon position during final proximal optimization technique (POT) in coronary bifurcation stenting.

Authors:  Lene N Andreasen; Niels R Holm; Bruce Webber; John A Ormiston
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Comparison of transradial coronary intervention for left main bifurcation disease using the new Braidin® slender 7 Fr sheath and a standard 6 Fr sheath.

Authors:  Yingkai Xu; Yingkai Li; Jiancai Yu; Deguang Wang; Qi Zhao; Yujing Cheng; Yujie Zhou
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.671

8.  Difference in basic concept of coronary bifurcation intervention between Korea and Japan. Insight from questionnaire in experts of Korean and Japanese bifurcation clubs.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Murasato; Yoshihisa Kinoshita; Junya Shite; Yutaka Hikichi; Chang-Wook Nam; Bon-Kwon Koo
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2021-01-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.