Literature DB >> 29553540

Chromatin Spread Preparations for the Analysis of Mouse Oocyte Progression from Prophase to Metaphase II.

Grace H Hwang1, Jessica L Hopkins1, Philip W Jordan2.   

Abstract

Chromatin spread techniques have been widely used to assess the dynamic localization of various proteins during gametogenesis, particularly for spermatogenesis. These techniques allow for visualization of protein and DNA localization patterns during meiotic events such as homologous chromosome pairing, synapsis and DNA repair. While a few protocols have been described in the literature, general chromatin spread techniques using mammalian prophase oocytes are limited and difficult due to the timing of meiosis initiation in fetal ovaries. In comparison, prophase spermatocytes can be collected from juvenile male mice with higher yields without the need for microdissection. However, it is difficult to obtain a pure synchronized population of cells at specific stages due to the heterogeneity of meiotic and post-meiotic germ cell populations in the juvenile and adult testis. For later stages of meiosis, it is advantageous to assess oocytes undergoing meiosis I (MI) or meiosis II (MII), because groups of mature oocytes can be collected from adult female mice and stimulated to resume meiosis in culture. Here, methods for meiotic chromatin spread preparations using oocytes dissected from fetal, neonatal and adult ovaries are described with accompanying video demonstrations. Chromosome missegregation events in mammalian oocytes are frequent, particularly during MI. These techniques can be used to assess and characterize the effects of different mutations or environmental exposures during various stages of oogenesis. As there are distinct differences between oogenesis and spermatogenesis, the techniques described within are invaluable to increase our understanding of mammalian oogenesis and the sexually dimorphic features of chromosome and protein dynamics during meiosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29553540      PMCID: PMC5931380          DOI: 10.3791/56736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  22 in total

1.  Microspread ovarian cell preparations for the analysis of meiotic prophase progression in oocytes with improved recovery by cytospin centrifugation.

Authors:  Teruko Taketo
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

2.  Chromosome spreads with centromere staining in mouse oocytes.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Chambon; Khaled Hached; Katja Wassmann
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2013

Review 3.  Complex elaboration: making sense of meiotic cohesin dynamics.

Authors:  Susannah Rankin
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 5.542

4.  Involvement of mouse Mlh1 in DNA mismatch repair and meiotic crossing over.

Authors:  S M Baker; A W Plug; T A Prolla; C E Bronner; A C Harris; X Yao; D M Christie; C Monell; N Arnheim; A Bradley; T Ashley; R M Liskay
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Meiotic arrest and aneuploidy in MLH3-deficient mice.

Authors:  Steven M Lipkin; Peter B Moens; Victoria Wang; Michelle Lenzi; Dakshine Shanmugarajah; Abigail Gilgeous; James Thomas; Jun Cheng; Jeffrey W Touchman; Eric D Green; Pam Schwartzberg; Francis S Collins; Paula E Cohen
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 6.  Analyzing mammalian female meiosis.

Authors:  Martha Susiarjo; Carmen Rubio; Patricia Hunt
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

Review 7.  Epigenetic transitions in germ cell development and meiosis.

Authors:  Satya K Kota; Robert Feil
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 12.270

8.  Mouse oocyte microinjection, maturation and ploidy assessment.

Authors:  Paula Stein; Karen Schindler
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Localization of MMR proteins on meiotic chromosomes in mice indicates distinct functions during prophase I.

Authors:  Nadine K Kolas; Anton Svetlanov; Michelle L Lenzi; Frank P Macaluso; Steven M Lipkin; R Michael Liskay; John Greally; Winfried Edelmann; Paula E Cohen
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  THE COMPARATIVE BEHAVIOR OF MAMMALIAN EGGS IN VIVO AND IN VITRO : I. THE ACTIVATION OF OVARIAN EGGS.

Authors:  G Pincus; E V Enzmann
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1935-10-31       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  3 in total

1.  RAD51AP2 is required for efficient meiotic recombination between X and Y chromosomes.

Authors:  Hui Ma; Tao Li; Xuefeng Xie; Long Jiang; Jingwei Ye; Chenjia Gong; Hanwei Jiang; Suixing Fan; Huan Zhang; Baolu Shi; Beibei Zhang; Xiaohua Jiang; Yang Li; Jianteng Zhou; Jianze Xu; Xingxia Zhang; Xiaoning Hou; Hao Yin; Yuanwei Zhang; Qinghua Shi
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 14.136

2.  Meiosis and beyond - understanding the mechanistic and evolutionary processes shaping the germline genome.

Authors:  Roberta Bergero; Peter Ellis; Wilfried Haerty; Lee Larcombe; Iain Macaulay; Tarang Mehta; Mette Mogensen; David Murray; Will Nash; Matthew J Neale; Rebecca O'Connor; Christian Ottolini; Ned Peel; Luke Ramsey; Ben Skinner; Alexander Suh; Michael Summers; Yu Sun; Alison Tidy; Raheleh Rahbari; Claudia Rathje; Simone Immler
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2021-01-01

3.  PLK1 is required for chromosome compaction and microtubule organization in mouse oocytes.

Authors:  Tara M Little; Philip W Jordan
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.612

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.