Kevin A Hallgren1, Adam D Wilson2, Katie Witkiewitz2. 1. Behavioral Research in Technology and Engineering (BRiTE) Center, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 2. Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions (CASAA) and Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Interest in studying mechanisms of behavior change (MOBCs) in substance use disorder (SUD) treatments has grown considerably in the past two decades. Much of this work has focused on identifying which variables statistically mediate the effect of SUD treatments on clinical outcomes. However, a fuller conceptualization of MOBCs will require greater understanding of questions that extend beyond traditional mediation analysis, including better understanding of when MOBCs change during treatment, when they are most critical to aiding the initiation or maintenance of change, and how MOBCs themselves arise as a function of treatment processes. METHOD: In the present study, we review why these MOBC-related questions are often minimally addressed in empirical research and provide examples of data analytic methods that may address these issues. We highlight several recent studies that have used such methods and discuss how these methods can provide unique theoretical insights and actionable clinical information. RESULTS: Several statistical approaches can enhance the field's understanding of the timing and development of MOBCs, including growth-curve modeling, time-varying effect modeling, moderated mediation analysis, dynamic systems modeling, and simulation methods. CONCLUSIONS: Adopting greater diversity in methods for modeling MOBCs will help researchers better understand the timing and development of key change variables and will expand the theoretical precision and clinical impact of MOBC research. Advances in research design, measurement, and technology are key to supporting these advances.
OBJECTIVE: Interest in studying mechanisms of behavior change (MOBCs) in substance use disorder (SUD) treatments has grown considerably in the past two decades. Much of this work has focused on identifying which variables statistically mediate the effect of SUD treatments on clinical outcomes. However, a fuller conceptualization of MOBCs will require greater understanding of questions that extend beyond traditional mediation analysis, including better understanding of when MOBCs change during treatment, when they are most critical to aiding the initiation or maintenance of change, and how MOBCs themselves arise as a function of treatment processes. METHOD: In the present study, we review why these MOBC-related questions are often minimally addressed in empirical research and provide examples of data analytic methods that may address these issues. We highlight several recent studies that have used such methods and discuss how these methods can provide unique theoretical insights and actionable clinical information. RESULTS: Several statistical approaches can enhance the field's understanding of the timing and development of MOBCs, including growth-curve modeling, time-varying effect modeling, moderated mediation analysis, dynamic systems modeling, and simulation methods. CONCLUSIONS: Adopting greater diversity in methods for modeling MOBCs will help researchers better understand the timing and development of key change variables and will expand the theoretical precision and clinical impact of MOBC research. Advances in research design, measurement, and technology are key to supporting these advances.
Authors: Udi E Ghitza; Robert E Gore-Langton; Robert Lindblad; David Shide; Geetha Subramaniam; Betty Tai Journal: Addiction Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Braden K Linn; Paul R Stasiewicz; Junru Zhao; Joseph F Lucke; Melanie U Ruszczyk; Charles LaBarre; Clara M Bradizza Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2021-09 Impact factor: 3.346
Authors: Davood Tofighi; Yu-Yu Hsiao; Eric S Kruger; David P MacKinnon; M Lee Van Horn; Katie A Witkiewitz Journal: Struct Equ Modeling Date: 2018-09-11 Impact factor: 6.125