Literature DB >> 29553047

Collimated proton pencil-beam scanning for superficial targets: impact of the order of range shifter and aperture.

C Bäumer1, M Janson, B Timmermann, J Wulff.   

Abstract

To assess if apertures shall be mounted upstream or downstream of a range shifting block if these field-shaping devices are combined with the pencil-beam scanning delivery technique (PBS). The lateral dose fall-off served as a benchmark parameter. Both options realizing PBS-with-apertures were compared to the uniform scanning mode. We also evaluated the difference regarding the out-of-field dose caused by interactions of protons in beam-shaping devices. The potential benefit of the downstream configuration over the upstream configuration was estimated analytically. Guided by this theoretical evaluation a mechanical adapter was developed which transforms the upstream configuration provided by the proton machine vendor to a downstream configuration. Transversal dose profiles were calculated with the Monte-Carlo based dose engine of the commercial treatment planning system RayStation 6. Two-dimensional dose planes were measured with an ionization chamber array and a scintillation detector at different depths and compared to the calculation. Additionally, a clinical example for the irradiation of the orbit was compared for both PBS options and a uniform scanning treatment plan. Assuming the same air gap the lateral dose fall-off at the field edge at a few centimeter depth is 20% smaller for the aperture-downstream configuration than for the upstream one. For both options of PBS-with-apertures the dose fall-off is larger than in uniform scanning delivery mode if the minimum accelerator energy is 100 MeV. The RayStation treatment planning system calculated the width of the lateral dose fall-off with an accuracy of typically 0.1 mm-0.3 mm. Although experiments and calculations indicate a ranking of the three delivery options regarding lateral dose fall-off, there seems to be a limited impact on a multi-field treatment plan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29553047     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aab79c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  5 in total

1.  Design of a focused collimator for proton therapy spot scanning using Monte Carlo methods.

Authors:  Theodore J Geoghegan; Nicholas P Nelson; Ryan T Flynn; Patrick M Hill; Suresh Rana; Daniel E Hyer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Clinical Implementation of Proton Therapy Using Pencil-Beam Scanning Delivery Combined With Static Apertures.

Authors:  Christian Bäumer; Sandija Plaude; Dalia Ahmad Khalil; Dirk Geismar; Paul-Heinz Kramer; Kevin Kröninger; Christian Nitsch; Jörg Wulff; Beate Timmermann
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Dose-Volume Comparison of IMRT and PSPT Treatment Plans for Early-Stage Glottic Cancer.

Authors:  Takahiro Kato; Nobukazu Fuwa; Masao Murakami
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2020-11-23

4.  Is it beneficial to use apertures in proton radiosurgery with a scanning beam? A dosimetric comparison in neurinoma and meningioma patients.

Authors:  Roberto Righetto; Francesco Fellin; Daniele Scartoni; Maurizio Amichetti; Marco Schwarz; Dante Amelio; Paolo Farace
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Innovations and the Use of Collimators in the Delivery of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Daniel E Hyer; Laura C Bennett; Theodore J Geoghegan; Martin Bues; Blake R Smith
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2021-06-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.