Literature DB >> 29552955

The Impact of Opening a Medical Step-Down Unit on Medically Critically Ill Patient Outcomes and Throughput: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis.

Hayley B Gershengorn1,2, Carri W Chan3, Yunchao Xu4, Hanxi Sun5, Ronni Levy6, Mor Armony4, Michelle N Gong2,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To understand the impact of adding a medical step-down unit (SDU) on patient outcomes and throughput in a medical intensive care unit (ICU).
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Two academic tertiary care hospitals within the same health-care system. PATIENTS: Adults admitted to the medical ICU at either the control or intervention hospital from October 2013 to March 2014 (preintervention) and October 2014 to March 2015 (postintervention).
INTERVENTIONS: Opening a 4-bed medical SDU at the intervention hospital on April 1, 2014.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Using standard summary statistics, we compared patients across hospitals. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we quantified the association of opening an SDU and outcomes (hospital mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay [LOS], and time to transfer to the ICU) after adjustment for secular trends in patient case-mix and patient-level covariates which might impact outcome. We analyzed 500 (245 pre- and 255 postintervention) patients in the intervention hospital and 678 (323 pre- and 355 postintervention) in the control hospital. Patients at the control hospital were younger (60.5-60.6 vs 64.0-65.4 years, P < .001) with a higher severity of acute illness at the time of evaluation for ICU admission (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score: 4.9-4.0 vs 3.9-3.9, P < .001). Using the difference-in-differences methodology, we identified no association of hospital mortality (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.81 [0.42 to 1.55], P = .52) or hospital LOS (% change [95% confidence interval]: -8.7% [-28.6% to 11.2%], P = .39) with admission to the intervention hospital after SDU opening. The ICU LOS overall was not associated with admission to the intervention hospital in the postintervention period (-23.7% [-47.9% to 0.5%], P = .06); ICU LOS among survivors was significantly reduced (-27.5% [-50.5% to -4.6%], P = .019). Time to transfer to ICU was also significantly reduced (-26.7% [-44.7% to -8.8%], P = .004).
CONCLUSIONS: Opening our medical SDU improved medical ICU throughput but did not affect more patient-centered outcomes of hospital mortality and LOS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  critical care; hospital administration; hospital mortality; hospital units; intensive care units; intermediate care units; length of stay; step-down units

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29552955     DOI: 10.1177/0885066618761810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0885-0666            Impact factor:   3.510


  3 in total

1.  Admitting Low-Risk Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage to a Neurological Step-Down Unit Is Safe, Results in Shorter Length of Stay, and Reduces Intensive Care Utilization: A Retrospective Controlled Cohort Study.

Authors:  Lindsay Laws; Flavia Lee; Abhay Kumar; Rajat Dhar
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2020-05-20

2.  From intensive care to step-down units: Managing patients throughput in response to COVID-19.

Authors:  Vanni Agnoletti; Emanuele Russo; Alessandro Circelli; Marco Benni; Giuliano Bolondi; Costanza Martino; Domenico P Santonastaso; Etrusca Brogi; Beniamino PraticÒ; Federico Coccolini; Paola Fugazzola; Luca Ansaloni; Emiliano Gamberini
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 2.038

3.  Medical surveillance unit: patient characteristics, outcome, and quality of care in Saskatchewan, Canada.

Authors:  Karl Vantomme; Muhammad Siddiqui; Marlee Cossette; Kish Lyster
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2020-02-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.