Literature DB >> 29552746

Evaluation of the Present-on-Admission Indicator among Hospitalized Fee-for-Service Medicare Patients with a Pressure Ulcer Diagnosis: Coding Patterns and Impact on Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcer Rates.

Lee Squitieri1,2, Daniel A Waxman3,4, Carol M Mangione1,5,6, Debra Saliba1,3,7,8, Clifford Y Ko6,9,10, Jack Needleman6, David A Ganz3,6,7,11.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate national present-on-admission (POA) reporting for hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs) and examine the impact of quality measure exclusion criteria on HAPU rates. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: Medicare inpatient, outpatient, and nursing facility data as well as independent provider claims (2010-2011). STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: We evaluated acute inpatient hospital admissions among Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries in 2011. Admissions were categorized as follows: (1) no pressure ulcer diagnosis, (2) new pressure ulcer diagnosis, and (3) previously documented pressure ulcer diagnosis. HAPU rates were calculated by varying patient exclusion criteria. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Among admissions with a pressure ulcer diagnosis, we observed a large discrepancy in the proportion of admissions with a HAPU based on hospital-reported POA data (5.2 percent) and the proportion with a new pressure ulcer diagnosis based on patient history in billing claims (49.7 percent). Applying quality measure exclusion criteria resulted in removal of 91.2 percent of admissions with a pressure injury diagnosis from HAPU rate calculations.
CONCLUSIONS: As payers and health care organizations expand the use of quality measures, it is important to consider how the measures are implemented, coding revisions to improve measure validity, and the impact of patient exclusion criteria on provider performance evaluation. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicare; Pressure ulcer; hospital-acquired conditions; present-on-admission indicator

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29552746      PMCID: PMC6056601          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  18 in total

1.  Annual checkup: the CMS pressure ulcer present-on-admission indicator.

Authors:  Courtney H Lyder; Elizabeth A Ayello
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.347

2.  Impact of present-on-admission indicators on risk-adjusted hospital mortality measurement.

Authors:  Jarrod E Dalton; Laurent G Glance; Edward J Mascha; John Ehrlinger; Nassib Chamoun; Daniel I Sessler
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Effect of Present-on-Admission (POA) Reporting Accuracy on Hospital Performance Assessments Using Risk-Adjusted Mortality.

Authors:  L Elizabeth Goldman; Philip W Chu; Peter Bacchetti; Jenna Kruger; Andrew Bindman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage and 30-day rehospitalization: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Amy J H Kind; Steve Jencks; Jane Brock; Menggang Yu; Christie Bartels; William Ehlenbach; Caprice Greenberg; Maureen Smith
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Area deprivation and widening inequalities in US mortality, 1969-1998.

Authors:  Gopal K Singh
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Pressure ulcer classification: the systems and the pitfalls.

Authors:  Linda Russell
Journal:  Br J Nurs       Date:  2002-06

7.  Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: results from the national Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System study.

Authors:  Courtney H Lyder; Yun Wang; Mark Metersky; Maureen Curry; Rebecca Kliman; Nancy R Verzier; David R Hunt
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Do the AHRQ patient safety indicators flag conditions that are present at the time of hospital admission?

Authors:  Vinita Bahl; Maureen A Thompson; Tsui-Ying Kau; Hsou Mei Hu; Darrell A Campbell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Examination of the accuracy of coding hospital-acquired pressure ulcer stages.

Authors:  Nicole M Coomer; Nancy T McCall
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2013-12-24

10.  Identifying potentially preventable complications using a present on admission indicator.

Authors:  John S Hughes; Richard F Averill; Norbert I Goldfield; James C Gay; John Muldoon; Elizabeth McCullough; Jean Xiang
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2006
View more
  3 in total

1.  Risk of readmissions, mortality, and hospital-acquired conditions across hospital-acquired pressure injury (HAPI) stages in a US National Hospital Discharge database.

Authors:  Christina L Wassel; Gary Delhougne; Julie A Gayle; Jill Dreyfus; Barrett Larson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-08-23       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Selecting Outcomes to Ensure Pragmatic Trials Are Relevant to People Living with Dementia.

Authors:  Laura C Hanson; Antonia V Bennett; Mattias Jonsson; Amy Kelley; Christine Ritchie; Debra Saliba; Joan Teno; Sheryl Zimmerman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Comparative Effectiveness of New Approaches to Improve Mortality Risk Models From Medicare Claims Data.

Authors:  Harlan M Krumholz; Andreas C Coppi; Frederick Warner; Elizabeth W Triche; Shu-Xia Li; Shiwani Mahajan; Yixin Li; Susannah M Bernheim; Jacqueline Grady; Karen Dorsey; Zhenqiu Lin; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-07-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.