Literature DB >> 29552739

The accuracy of comparing laparoscopic hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse.

Ismail Alay1, Cihan Kaya2, Hüseyin Cengiz2.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2018        PMID： 29552739     DOI： 10.1007/s00192-018-3614-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN： 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  AAGL practice report: Practice Guidelines on the Prevention of Apical Prolapse at the Time of Benign Hysterectomy.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 4.137

2.  Sacrospinous ligament fixation and modified McCall culdoplasty during vaginal hysterectomy for advanced uterovaginal prolapse.

Authors:  M Colombo; R Milani
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  The UK national prolapse survey: 5 years on.

Authors:  Swati Jha; Paul Moran
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Laparoscopic hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse: a prospective randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Philip Rahmanou; Natalia Price; Simon R Jackson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Effectiveness of the McCall culdeplasty in maintaining support after vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Joseph M Montella; Michelle Y Morrill
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-10-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.