| Literature DB >> 29552059 |
Mona Hafez Hetta1, Abeer Sayed Moawad2, Manal Abdel-Aziz Hamed3, Ahmed Ismail Sabri1.
Abstract
This study was designed in order to correlate the flavonoid and lipoidal matters content of Spinach roots and flowers to their hypolipidemic potential. The total flavonoid content was measured via complexation with aluminum chloride while determination of fatty acids methyl esters and unsaponifiable matters in both organs was performed using GC/MS. In an in-vitro study, the crude ethanol extracts of both organs and their different fractions were separately examined for inhibition of β-hydroxy-β-methyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMG-CoA reductase); the rate limiting enzyme of cholesterol biosynthesis. The percentage inhibition of alcohol extracts of roots and flowers were 78.19% and 72.68% respectively when compared to the control. The crude alcohol extracts of both organs were further examined in-vivo. Results showed that both extracts improved the investigated parameters by variable degrees compared to fenofibrate reference drug. The root extract showed significant improvement of TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, TG and total lipids (52.75, 209.85, 21.84, 49.26 and 29.62% respectively) when compared to hypercholesterolemic rats. The histopathological picture of liver showed a noticeable amelioration after treatment with root extract. The flavonoid content was higher in flower than root (983.4 and 300.2 mg/kg respectively) while the percentage of sterols and triterpenes in roots was greater than flowers (22.47% and 17.02 % respectively). In conclusion, the root ethanolic extract recorded more potent activity than flower as hypolipidemic agent either in-vitro or in-vivo examination which was more correlated to the sterol content than to the flavonoid content.Entities:
Keywords: Chenopodiaceae; Flavonoid content; Hypolipidemic; Lipoidal matters; Spinach
Year: 2017 PMID: 29552059 PMCID: PMC5843312
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pharm Res ISSN: 1726-6882 Impact factor: 1.696
Determination of total flavonoid contents of flowers, roots and leaves of Spinach.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Flower | 983.4559± 0.07 |
| Root | 300.2451± 0.12 |
| Leaf | 1537.99 ± 0.56 |
GC/MS analysis of fatty acid methyl esters of Spinach roots and flowers.
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 0.38 | Tetradecanoic acid | 19.55 | 0.46 | Tetradecanoic acid | 19.55 | ||
| 0.43 | Pentadecanoic acid | 20.88 | 0.34 | Tetradecanoic acid,12-methyl | 20.51 | ||
| 18.73 | Hexadecanoic acid | 22.18 | 0.38 | Pentadecanoic acid | 20.89 | ||
| 1.88 | Heptadecanoic acid,16-methyl | 24.12 | 0.15 | Pentadecanoic acid, 14-methyl | 21.70 | ||
| 0.63 | 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid | 24.74 | 24.16 | Hexadecanoic acid (palmitic) | 22.22 | ||
| 0.74 | 6,9- Octadecadienoic acid | 25.23 | 30.53 | 9,12,15-Octadecadienoic acid | 24.34 | ||
| 1.02 | Eicosanoic acid | 26.72 | 1.19 | Nonanoic acid, 9-(o-propylphenyl) | 25.01 | ||
| 0.55 | Octadecanoic acid,11-methyl | 28.39 | 2.59 | 10,13- octadecadienoic acid | 25.25 | ||
| 0.38 | 4,8,12,16 tetramethyl | 27.06 | |||||
major compounds
GC/MS analysis of unsaponifiable matter of roots and flowers of Spinach.
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.84 | 9,19-Cycloanostan-3-ol, 24-methyl | 43.67 | |||
| 0.63 | Cycloeicosane | 26.32 | 1.76 | 1-Tricosene | 28.38 |
| 0.58 | 1-Nonadecene | 30.32 | 1.20 | Heptacosane | 30.31 |
| 0.98 | Octacosane | 35.12 | 7.76 | Hexacosane, 9-octyl | 31.00 |
| 0.29 | Cholestan-3-one, 4,4-dimethyl | 38.59 | 1.24 | Nonacosane | 32.34 |
| 0.84 | Ergost -7-en-3-ol | 39.03 | 2.15 | Eicosane, 10-heptyl-10-octyl | 33.24 |
| 0.64 | Ergosta-8,24(28)-dien-3-ol, 4,14-dimethyl | 39.32 | 1.96 | Nonacosan-10-ol | 34.61 |
| 9.53* | Stigmasta-7,16-dien-3-ol | 40.02 | 1.03 | 1-Nonadecene | 36.57 |
| 1.66 | Stigmastan-3-ol | 40.24 | 8.65 | Stigmasta-7,16-dien-3-ol | 39.78 |
| 2.84 | Lanost-24-en-3-ol | 40.92 | 2.65 | Lanosta-8,24-dien-3-ol | 40.75 |
| 4.51 | Stigmasta-7-en-3-ol | 41.48 | 4.24 | Stigmasta-7-en-3-ol | 41.28 |
| 1.71 | Pregn-15-en-20-one | 41.91 | 1.48 | α-amyrin | 41.89 |
| 2.16 | Lanosta-8,24-dien-3-ol | 42.24 | 2.68 | 9,19-Cycloanostan-3-ol, 24-methyl | 43.54 |
major compounds
In-vitro hypolipidemic activity of Spinach roots and flowers
|
|
|
|
| Control | 16.33±0.33 | ---- |
| (Fenofibrate; 100µg) | 1.51±0.23 | 90.75% |
|
| ||
| Total 70% EtOH | 3.56±0.21 | 78.19% |
| Petroleum ether | 4.41±0.29 | 72.99% |
| EtOAc | 5.49±0.13 | 66.38% |
| H2O | 5.60 ± 0.22 | 65.57% |
|
| ||
| Total 70% EtOH | 4.67±0.10 | 72.68% |
| Petroleum ether | 6.42±0.09 | 60.68% |
| EtOAc | 7.36±0.06 | 54.92% |
| H2O | 6.22 ±0.19 | 61.91% |
Data are mean± SD of three readings.
% of inhibition=Control value- test value x 100 /Control value.
β-hydroxy-β glutaryl CoA- reductase)
Effect of treatment with roots and flowers extracts of Spinach on lipid profile of hypercholesterolemic rats.
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| TC | 113.00±9.08d | 290.00±19.68a | 137.00±7.58c | 153.60±7.89b | 131.20±5.01c |
| HDL-C | 62.94±3.56a | 13.70±1.66d | 42.45±4.28b | 30.17±7.08c | 33.32±5.64c |
| LDL-C | 69.93±13.24b | 112.28±5.60a | 87.75±15.07b | 88.66±21.86b | 75.80±15.41b |
| TG | 130.57±3.68c | 269.62±25.24a | 136.80±3.08c | 178.17±9.20b | 131.18±12.34c |
| Total lipids | 4.86±0.58d | 8.64±0.41a | 6.08±0.22c | 7.23±0.52b | 7.15±0.29b |
●Data are means ± SD of eight rats in each group.
●Data are expressed as mg/dL. Total lipids are expressed as g/dL.
●Unshared superscript letters between groups are the significance values at p< 0.0001.
●Values between brackets are percentage change over control group.
●Values between parentheses are percentage change over cholesterolemic group.
●Statistical analysis is carried out by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) – Costatsoftware computer program accompanied with LSD between groups at p<0.05.
●1: control group; 2: cholesterol untreated group; 3: group treated with root extract; 4: group treated with flower extract; 5: fenofibrate-treated group.
Effect of treatment with roots and flowers extracts of Spinach on liver function enzymes of hypercholesterolemic rats
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| AST | 37.02±2.27b | 54.41±4.31a | 37.84±5.69b | 38.33±3.23b | 39.52±1.94b |
| ALT | 42.06±4.75c | 66.06±3.11a | 43.17±3.11c | 48.19±3.19b | 48.22±2.67b |
| ALP | 46.20±1.92d | 78.00±1.22a | 56.80±1.30c | 62.40±2.30b | 63.20±1.92b |
●Data are means ± SD of eight rats in each group, Data are expressed as Unit/L.
●Unshared superscript letters between groups are the significance values at p< 0.0001.
●Values between brackets are percentage change over control group.
●Values between parentheses are percentage change over cholesterolemic group.
●Statistical analysis is carried out by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) – Costat software computer program accompanied with LSD between groups at p<0.05.
●1: control group; 2: cholesterol untreated group; 3: group treated with root extract; 4: group treated with flower extract; 5: fenofibrate- treated group.
Percentage of improvement of lipid profile and liver function after treatment with crude alcohol extracts of roots and flowers
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| TC | 135.39% | 120.70% | 140.53% |
| HDL-C | 45.67% | 26.16% | 31.17% |
| LDL-C | 35.07% | 33.77% | 52.16% |
| TG | 101.72% | 70.03% | 106.02% |
| Total lipids | 52.67% | 29.01% | 30.65% |
| AST | 44.75 | 43.40 | 40.22 |
| ALT | 54.42 | 42.48 | 42.41 |
| ALP | 45.88 | 33.76 | 32.03 |
●Values are % of improvement over control group.
●of improvement %= [(mean treated - mean cholesterolemic)/mean control]× 100.
●3 group treated with root extract; 4: group treated with flower extract; 5: fenofibrate-treated group.
Figure 1Stain (H&E) Liver of normal rats showing normal histological structure (A) and hyperlipidemic group showed mild degeneration of hepatocytes stained with (H&E) andmild leucocytic infiltration within theportal areas(Masson's trichrome) (B).
Figure 2.Liver treated with total flowers extract showing congested and marked dilation of hepatic sinusoids (H&E stain) (A), focal leucocytic aggregations within the portal area (H and E stain) (B) and multiple granulomas (Masson's trichrome stains) (C). Liver treated with root extract had mild degeneration (H&E stain) (D). Liver treated with drug had mild degeneration and congestion (H&E stain) (E).