| Literature DB >> 29551931 |
Xiao Chen1,2, Chun-Jie Hu1.
Abstract
Digital images are now widely used in modern clinic diagnosis. The diagnostic images with confidential information related to patients' privacy are stored and transmitted via public networks. Secured schemes to guarantee confidentiality of patients' privacy are becoming more and more vital. This paper proposes an adaptive medical image encryption algorithm based on improved chaotic mapping in order to overcome the defects of the existing chaotic image encryption algorithm. First, the algorithm used Logistic-sine chaos mapping to scramble the plain image. Then, the scrambled image was divided into 2-by-2 sub blocks. By using the hyper-chaotic system, the sub blocks were adaptively encrypted until all the sub block encryption was completed. By analyzing the key space, the information entropy, the correlation coefficient and the plaintext sensitivity of the algorithm, experimental results show that the proposed algorithm overcomes the shortcoming of lack of diffusion in single direction encryption. It could effectively resist all kinds of attacks and has better security and robustness.Entities:
Keywords: Hyper-chaotic system; Image encryption; Logistic-sine mapping; Position scrambling
Year: 2017 PMID: 29551931 PMCID: PMC5851915 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2017.11.023
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 1319-562X Impact factor: 4.219
Fig. 1The system attractor diagram.
Fig. 2Image of the 2-by-2 blocks.
Fig. 3(a) Original image, and (b) encrypted image.
Fig. 4Gray scale histogram of (a) plain image and (b) cipher image.
Fig. 5(a) changes the decrypted image and (b) changes the decrypted image.
Fig. 6(a and b) Horizontal correlation of plain text and cipher images, (c and d) vertical correlation of plain text and cipher images, and (e and f) diagonal correlation of plain text and cipher images.
The correlation coefficient of adjacent pixels.
| Direction | Plain image | Cipher image | RE ( | RE ( | RE ( | RE ( | RE ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horizontal | 0.9568 | −0.0028 | 0.0127 | 0.0136 | 0.0500 | 0.2546 | 0.0242 |
| Vertical | 0.9642 | 0.0171 | 0.0190 | 0.0062 | 0.0400 | −0.0573 | 0.0194 |
| Diagonal | 0.9351 | −0.0022 | 0.0012 | 0.0175 | 0.0200 | −0.0024 | 0.0024 |
NPCR and UACI comparison with different models.
| Test | Proposed | RE ( | RE ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| NPCR/% | 99.59 | 99.70 | 88.99 |
| UACI/% | 33.42 | 28.29 | 30.21 |