Literature DB >> 29551470

Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.

Maher El Chaar1, Peter Lundberg2, Jill Stoltzfus3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: According to recent American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimates, sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is now the most commonly performed procedure in the United States (~53.8% of all bariatric procedures), followed by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB; 23.1% of all procedures).
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes and safety of these 2 procedures in the first 30 days postoperatively using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program data registry.
SETTING: University health network, United States.
METHODS: We reviewed all SG and RYGB cases entered between January 1 and December 31, 2015 in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program data registry. Demographic characteristics and 30-day outcomes were analyzed based on separate Mann-Whitney rank sums tests, χ2, or Fisher's exact tests as appropriate, with P<.05 denoting statistical significance and no adjustment for multiple testing.
RESULTS: A total of 141,646 patients were analyzed; 98,292 underwent SG and 43,354 underwent RYGB. Average age was 44.5 and 45.4 years for SG and RYGB, respectively. Preoperative body mass index was 45.1 and 46.1 for SG and RYGB, respectively. The 30-day mortality was .1% for SG and .2% for RYGB (P<.05). The incidence of unplanned intensive care unit admission after RYGB was twice as high compared with SG (1.3% versus .6%, respectively, P<.05). The incidence of at least 1 intervention or reoperation after RYGB was significantly higher compared with SG (2.8% and 2.5% for GB versus 1.2% and 1% for SG, P<.05). After RYGB, .4% of patients had a drain left in place at 30 days postoperatively versus .3% for SG (P<.05). The incidence of readmission was 2.8% for RYGB and 1.2% for SG (P<.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of postoperative complications in the first 30 days after surgery is low for both RYGB and SG. However, SG seems to have a better safety profile in the first 30 days postoperatively compared with RYGB. These findings should be considered in the preoperative evaluation and counseling of bariatric patients. Long-term follow-up is needed to compare safety and efficacy of SG versus RYGB.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) data registry; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; Sleeve gastrectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29551470     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  20 in total

1.  Change in predicted 10-year and lifetime cardiovascular disease risk after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Amanda S Hinerman; Emma J M Barinas-Mitchell; Samar R El Khoudary; Anita P Courcoulas; Abdus S Wahed; Wendy C King
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2020-04-19       Impact factor: 4.734

2.  Findings of YOMEGA Trial Need to Be Interpreted with Caution.

Authors:  Kamal K Mahawar
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Bariatric Surgery Worldwide: Baseline Demographic Description and One-Year Outcomes from the Fourth IFSO Global Registry Report 2018.

Authors:  Richard Welbourn; Marianne Hollyman; Robin Kinsman; John Dixon; Ronald Liem; Johan Ottosson; Almino Ramos; Villy Våge; Salman Al-Sabah; Wendy Brown; Ricardo Cohen; Peter Walton; Jacques Himpens
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 4.  Safety of one-stage conversion surgery after failed gastric band: our experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Peter W Lundberg; Abigail Gotsch; Eonjung Kim; Leonardo Claros; Jill Stotlzfus; Maher El Chaar
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-11-22

5.  Factors influencing the choice between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Hassan Nasser; Tommy Ivanics; Arthur M Carlin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Revisional Bariatric Surgery for Weight Regain and Refractory Complications in a Single MBSAQIP Accredited Center: What Are We Dealing with?

Authors:  Jeffrey Qiu; Peter W Lundberg; T Javier Birriel; Leonardo Claros; Jill Stoltzfus; Maher El Chaar
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Quality of MBSAQIP data: bad luck, or lack of QA plan?

Authors:  K Noyes; A A Myneni; S D Schwaitzberg; A B Hoffman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Primary Care Physicians' Perceptions of Bariatric Surgery and Major Barriers to Referral.

Authors:  Eliza A Conaty; Woody Denham; Stephen P Haggerty; John G Linn; Raymond J Joehl; Michael B Ujiki
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Bariatric-Metabolic Surgery Utilisation in Patients With and Without Diabetes: Data from the IFSO Global Registry 2015-2018.

Authors:  Richard Welbourn; Marianne Hollyman; Robin Kinsman; John Dixon; Ricardo Cohen; John Morton; Amir Ghaferi; Kelvin Higa; Johan Ottosson; Francois Pattou; Salman Al-Sabah; Merhan Anvari; Jacques Himpens; Ronald Liem; Villy Våge; Peter Walton; Wendy Brown; Lilian Kow
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 3.479

10.  A Qualitative Study of the System-level Barriers to Bariatric Surgery Within the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Luke M Funk; Esra Alagoz; Sally A Jolles; Grace E Shea; Rebecca L Gunter; Susan D Raffa; Corrine I Voils
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.