Literature DB >> 29551171

Top ten concerns burdening people with cancer: Perceptions of patients with cancer and the nurses caring for them.

Keith S J Mitchell1, Sarah Delfont2, Maria Lucinda Bracey3, Ruth Endacott4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We examined the concerns that nurses perceive patients to have, whether these are congruent with patients' concerns and whether they vary according to cancer site. We also examined Distress Thermometer scores according to cancer site.
METHOD: A cross-sectional survey design: (i) secondary analysis of an existing Holistic Needs Assessment (HNA) and Distress Thermometer (DT) dataset was used, (ii) a survey of specialist nurse teams to identify their perceptions of patient concerns. Data collected between January 2015 and June 2016 from the HNA database from one NHS Trust in England (n = 1233 patients). Specialist nurse teams for breast, colorectal, gynaecology, skin and urology cancers identified the concerns that they perceived their patients would report.
RESULTS: The HNA showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.86). Across the five cancer sites, nurses identified between 3 and 6 of the top ten concerns (TTC) expressed by patients, with wide variation across cancer sites. Nine of the TTC were significantly associated (p < 0.05) with a specific cancer site. The breast and gynaecological cancer groups both recorded significantly higher median Distress Thermometer scores than the urology, skin and colorectal cancer groups (Kruskall-Wallis χ2 (4, n = 1228) 186.695, p=<.01).
CONCLUSIONS: One of the aims of the eHNA is to enable service delivery appropriate to patient needs. Our findings suggest that this will only be achieved if eHNA is examined, and services developed, by individual cancer site. The misconception of patient needs by specialist nurses underscores the importance of review of information provided by patients during consultations.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer site; Oncology nursing; Patient needs; Psychological distress

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29551171     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs        ISSN: 1462-3889            Impact factor:   2.398


  3 in total

1.  A mixed methods analysis of perceived cognitive impairment in hematopoietic stem cell transplant survivors.

Authors:  Lisa M Wu; Nadia Kuprian; Krista Herbert; Ali Amidi; Jane Austin; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Christine Rini
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2019-08

2.  Pelvic Anastomosis Without Protective Ileostomy is Safe in Patients Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ekaterina Baron; Vadim Gushchin; Mary Caitlin King; Andrei Nikiforchin; Armando Sardi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  "My gut feeling is we could do more..." a qualitative study exploring staff and patient perspectives before and after the implementation of an online prostate cancer-specific holistic needs assessment.

Authors:  Amy L Clarke; Julia Roscoe; Rebecca Appleton; Jeremy Dale; Veronica Nanton
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.