Literature DB >> 29550836

Therapy for children and adults with mixed phenotype acute leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Maria Maruffi1,2, Richard Sposto1,3, Matthew J Oberley3,4, Lynn Kysh5, Etan Orgel6,7.   

Abstract

The rarity of mixed-phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) has resulted in diffuse literature consisting of small case series, thus precluding a consensus treatment approach. We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review to investigate the association of treatment type (acute lymphoblastic leukemia [ALL], acute myeloid leukemia [AML], or "hybrid" regimens), disease response, and survival. We searched seven databases from inception through June 2017 without age or language restriction. Included studies reported sufficient treatment detail for de novo MPAL classified according to the well-established European Group for Immunological Characterization of Acute Leukemias (EGIL) or World Health Organization (WHO2008) criteria. Meta-analyses and multivariable analyses of a patient-level compiled case series were performed for the endpoints of complete remission (CR) and overall survival (OS). We identified 97 reports from 33 countries meeting criteria, resulting in 1,499 unique patients with data, of whom 1,351 had sufficient detail for quantitative analysis of the study endpoints. Using either definition of MPAL, meta-analyses revealed that AML induction was less likely to achieve a CR as compared to ALL regimens, (WHO2008 odds ratio [OR] = 0.33, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.18-0.58; EGIL, OR = 0.18, 95% CI 0.08-0.40). Multivariable analysis of the patient-level data supported poorer efficacy for AML induction (versus ALL: OR = 0.45 95% CI 0.27-0.77). Meta-analyses similarly found better OS for those beginning with ALL versus AML therapy (WHO2008 OR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.26-0.77; EGIL, OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.78), but multivariable analysis of patient-level data showed only those starting with hybrid therapy fared worse (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.11, 95% CI 1.30-3.43). MPAL definition did not impact trends within each endpoint and were similarly predictive of outcome. Using either definition of MPAL, ALL-therapy is associated with higher initial remission rates for MPAL and is at least equivalent to more intensive AML therapy for long-term survival. Prospective trials are needed to establish a uniform approach to this heterogeneous disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29550836     DOI: 10.1038/s41375-018-0058-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  19 in total

1.  Acute lymphoblastic leukemia-like treatment regimen provides better response in mixed phenotype acute leukemia: a comparative study between adults and pediatric MPAL patients.

Authors:  Eman O Rasekh; Randa Osman; Dalia Ibraheem; Youssef Madney; Enas Radwan; Abdallah Gameel; Ahmed Abdelhafiz; Azza Kamel; Sally Elfishawi
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 2.  Redefining the biological basis of lineage-ambiguous leukemia through genomics: BCL11B deregulation in acute leukemias of ambiguous lineage.

Authors:  Lindsey E Montefiori; Charles G Mullighan
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Haematol       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Rare Case of Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia Presenting as a Myeloid Sarcoma Without Leukemic Involvement.

Authors:  Jeffrey Means; David Feldman; Allison Shaw; Khoan Vu
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2022-04-05

4.  Secondary donor-derived humanized CD19-modified CAR-T cells induce remission in relapsed/refractory mixed phenotype acute leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a case report.

Authors:  Meng-Yun Li; Zhi-Hong Lin; Ming-Ming Hu; Li-Qing Kang; Xiao-Xia Wu; Qi-Wei Chen; Xin Kong; Jian Zhang; Hui-Ying Qiu; De-Pei Wu
Journal:  Biomark Res       Date:  2020-08-31

5.  Mixed-phenotype acute leukemia: A cohort and consensus research strategy from the Children's Oncology Group Acute Leukemia of Ambiguous Lineage Task Force.

Authors:  Etan Orgel; Thomas B Alexander; Brent L Wood; Samir B Kahwash; Meenakshi Devidas; Yunfeng Dai; Todd A Alonzo; Charles G Mullighan; Hiroto Inaba; Stephen P Hunger; Elizabeth A Raetz; Alan S Gamis; Karen R Rabin; Andrew J Carroll; Nyla A Heerema; Jason N Berman; William G Woods; Mignon L Loh; Patrick A Zweidler-McKay; John T Horan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia: Current Approaches to Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Thomas B Alexander; Etan Orgel
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 7.  Mixed Phenotype/Lineage Leukemia: Has Anything Changed for 2021 on Diagnosis, Classification, and Treatment?

Authors:  Marie C Béné; Anna Porwit
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 5.945

8.  High dose cytarabine, mitoxantrone, pegasapargase (HAM-pegA) in combination with dasatinib for the first-line treatment of Philadelphia chromosome positive mixed phenotype acute leukemia.

Authors:  Ciera L Patzke; Ashkan Emadi
Journal:  Am J Leuk Res       Date:  2020-10-15

9.  CEBPE expression is an independent prognostic factor for acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Kening Li; Yuxin Du; Dong-Qing Wei; Fang Zhang
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 5.531

10.  Clinical Characteristics And Outcome Of Biphenotypic Acute Leukemia: 10 Case Reports And Literature Review.

Authors:  Jifeng Yu; Yingmei Li; Haizhou Xing; Yue Pan; Hui Sun; Dingming Wan; Yanfang Liu; Xinsheng Xie; Chong Wang; Ling Sun; Kai Sun; Zhongxing Jiang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.