Amanda M Kalamar1, Özge Tunçalp2, Michelle J Hindin3. 1. Population Services International, 1120 19th St. NW Suite 600, Washington, DC 20036. 2. World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland. 3. The Population Council, 1 Dag Hammarskjold Plaza, New York, NY 10017. Electronic address: mhindin@popcouncil.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We explore the patterns of adolescents' need for contraception in 46 low- and middle-income countries. METHODS: Using data from the Demographic and Health Surveys, we estimate the prevalence of never-use, ever-use and current contraceptive use of sexually active adolescent girls ages 15-19. We use weighted fixed-effects meta-analytic techniques to estimate summary measures. Finally, we highlight country profiles of adolescent contraceptive use. RESULTS: More than half (54.4%) of sexually active or girls in unions report never using contraception, while 13.3% report having used contraception but not currently doing so. Nearly a third report currently using a contraceptive method: 24.6% are using a modern short-term method, 2.5% are using a most effective method, and 5.2% are using a traditional method. CONCLUSIONS: We find significant heterogeneity across countries as well as within countries based on adolescents needs for spacing, limiting and method preference. With more than half of sexually active adolescents having never used contraception, the potential for unwanted pregnancies is high. IMPLICATIONS: While there is no single strategy to address adolescents' contraceptive needs, country programs may want to consider the heterogeneity of adolescents' risks for unintended pregnancy and tailor programs to align with the profile of adolescents in their settings.
OBJECTIVE: We explore the patterns of adolescents' need for contraception in 46 low- and middle-income countries. METHODS: Using data from the Demographic and Health Surveys, we estimate the prevalence of never-use, ever-use and current contraceptive use of sexually active adolescent girls ages 15-19. We use weighted fixed-effects meta-analytic techniques to estimate summary measures. Finally, we highlight country profiles of adolescent contraceptive use. RESULTS: More than half (54.4%) of sexually active or girls in unions report never using contraception, while 13.3% report having used contraception but not currently doing so. Nearly a third report currently using a contraceptive method: 24.6% are using a modern short-term method, 2.5% are using a most effective method, and 5.2% are using a traditional method. CONCLUSIONS: We find significant heterogeneity across countries as well as within countries based on adolescents needs for spacing, limiting and method preference. With more than half of sexually active adolescents having never used contraception, the potential for unwanted pregnancies is high. IMPLICATIONS: While there is no single strategy to address adolescents' contraceptive needs, country programs may want to consider the heterogeneity of adolescents' risks for unintended pregnancy and tailor programs to align with the profile of adolescents in their settings.
Authors: Isabella Claure; Deborah Anderson; Catherine M Klapperich; Wendy Kuohung; Joyce Y Wong Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2019-11-07 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Nivedita L Bhushan; Twambilile Phanga; Bertha Maseko; Dhrutika Vansia; Linda Kamtsendero; Margaret W Gichane; Suzanne Maman; Audrey E Pettifor; Nora E Rosenberg Journal: Stud Fam Plann Date: 2021-09-29
Authors: Ayodeji Emmanuel Iyanda; Barbara J Dinkins; Tolulope Osayomi; Temitope Joshua Adeusi; Yongmei Lu; Joseph R Oppong Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2020-04-09 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Lianne Gonsalves; Michelle J Hindin; Angela Bayer; Cesar P Carcamo; Peter Gichangi; Ndema Habib; Jefferson Mwaisaka; Lale Say Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2018-07-11 Impact factor: 3.223
Authors: Christina J Atchison; Jenny A Cresswell; Saidi Kapiga; Mussa Kelvin Nsanya; Emily E Crawford; Mohammed Mussa; Christian Bottomley; James R Hargreaves; Aoife M Doyle Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 3.223