Literature DB >> 29550383

Liposomal Grb2 antisense oligodeoxynucleotide (BP1001) in patients with refractory or relapsed haematological malignancies: a single-centre, open-label, dose-escalation, phase 1/1b trial.

Maro Ohanian1, Ana Tari Ashizawa2, Guillermo Garcia-Manero1, Naveen Pemmaraju1, Tapan Kadia1, Elias Jabbour1, Farhad Ravandi1, Gautam Borthakur1, Michael Andreeff1, Marina Konopleva1, Miranda Lim1, Sherry Pierce1, Susan O'Brien3, Yesid Alvarado1, Srdan Verstovsek1, William Wierda1, Hagop Kantarjian1, Jorge Cortes4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Activating mutations of tyrosine kinases are common in leukaemias. Oncogenic tyrosine kinases use the growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 (Grb2) for signal transduction, leading to activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) 1 and MAPK3 (ERK2 and ERK1). We hypothesised that inhibition of Grb2 would suppress ERK1 and ERK2 activation and inhibit leukaemia progression. To inhibit Grb2, a liposome-incorporated antisense oligodeoxynucleotide that blocks Grb2 protein expression, BP1001, was developed. We report the first phase 1 findings of BP1001.
METHODS: In this single-centre, open-label, dose-escalation phase 1/1b trial, we enrolled participants (aged ≥18 years) with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia, Philadelphia-chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukaemia (in chronic, accelerated, or blast phase), acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, or myelodysplastic syndrome, at MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA). We used a 3 + 3 dose escalation strategy, with at least three patients enrolled at each dose level. We administered BP1001 intravenously, twice weekly, for 28 days, with a starting dose of 5 mg/m2. If two or more patients developed toxic effects of grade 3 or higher, that dose level was deemed toxic. The dose was escalated if it did not produce dose-limiting toxic effects, and patients would be sequentially enrolled into cohort 2 (10 mg/m2), cohort 3 (20 mg/m2), cohort 4 (40 mg/m2), cohort 5 (60 mg/m2), or cohort 6 (90 mg/m2). After completion of monotherapy, we assessed the safety and toxicity of BP1001 (60 or 90 mg/m2) in combination with 20 mg low-dose cytarabine (twice-daily subcutaneous injections) in a phase 1b study in patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia (ie, those who were refractory to at least one previous therapy regimen and no more than one previous salvage regimen). The objectives of this study were to establish the toxicity and tolerance of escalating doses of BP1001 monotherapy in patients with refractory or relapsed leukaemia, to assess the maximum tolerated dose of BP1001, and to determine the optimal biologically active dose of BP1001, defined as a 50% reduction in Grb2 expression in circulating leukaemia cells. We also aimed to assess the in-vivo pharmacokinetics of BP1001 and tumour response. The study is completed and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01159028.
FINDINGS: Between July 23, 2010, and Feb 23, 2016, we enrolled and treated 39 patients, of whom 27 were assessable for dose-limiting toxicity. The first patient treated had mucositis and hand-foot syndrome, which were assessed as possibly related to BP1001 and counted as a dose-limiting toxicity. We noted no other dose-limiting toxicities, and a maximum tolerated dose was not identified. The highest tested dose of BP1001 was 90 mg/m2. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were cardiopulmonary disorders (25 [64%] of 39 patients), and fever (including neutropenic fever) and infections (17 [44%] patients). Grade 5 adverse events were cardiopulmonary disorders (two [5%] of 39 patients), fever (including neutropenic fever) and infections (two [5%] of 39 patients), and multi-organ failure (one [3%] of 39 patients). Nine (33%) of 27 patients who had peripheral blood blasts at the start of therapy had a reduction of 50% or more in peripheral blood blasts while receiving BP1001 montherapy. Three (10%) of 29 patients who had bone marrow blasts at the start of therapy had a reduction in bone marrow blasts of 50% or more while receiving BP1001 monotherapy. Per investigator's assessment, seven (22%) of 32 patients benefited from BP1001 monotherapy and had extended cycles of treatment. Of seven patients receiving BP1001 plus low-dose cytarabine combination therapy, two had complete remission, one had complete remission with incomplete haematological recovery, and two had stable disease with no dose-limiting toxicity; one patient died and one withdrew, both because of disease progression. There were eight deaths; none were treatment related.
INTERPRETATION: BP1001 is well tolerated, with early evidence of anti-leukaemic activity in combination with low-dose cytarabine. To further explore this anti-leukaemic activity, the efficacy of BP1001 plus low-dose cytarabine combination is being investigated in an ongoing phase 2 study in patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukaemia who are ineligible for intensive induction therapy. FUNDING: Bio-Path Holdings Inc.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29550383     DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30021-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Haematol        ISSN: 2352-3026            Impact factor:   18.959


  17 in total

Review 1.  Phosphotyrosine isosteres: past, present and future.

Authors:  Robert A Cerulli; Joshua A Kritzer
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.876

2.  Blast and accelerated phase CML: room for improvement.

Authors:  Joan How; Vinayak Venkataraman; Gabriela Soriano Hobbs
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2021-12-10

3.  The structural basis of BCR-ABL recruitment of GRB2 in chronic myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  Yonglan Liu; Hyunbum Jang; Mingzhen Zhang; Chung-Jung Tsai; Ryan Maloney; Ruth Nussinov
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.699

Review 4.  Targeting Approaches of Nanomedicines in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Xiao Huang; Hai Lin; Feng Huang; Yuning Xie; Ka Hong Wong; Xiaoyu Chen; Dongyue Wu; Aiping Lu; Zhijun Yang
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 5.  Third-line therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Jorge Cortes; Fabian Lang
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 17.388

6.  Therapeutic efficacy of liposomal Grb2 antisense oligodeoxynucleotide (L-Grb2) in preclinical models of ovarian and uterine cancer.

Authors:  Olivia D Lara; Emine Bayraktar; Paola Amero; Shaolin Ma; Cristina Ivan; Wei Hu; Ying Wang; Lingegowda S Mangala; Prasanta Dutta; Pratip Bhattacharya; Ana Tari Ashizawa; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; Cristian Rodriguez-Aguayo; Anil K Sood
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2020-07-21

Review 7.  Nanocarriers as Magic Bullets in the Treatment of Leukemia.

Authors:  Mohammad Houshmand; Francesca Garello; Paola Circosta; Rachele Stefania; Silvio Aime; Giuseppe Saglio; Claudia Giachino
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 8.  Aptamers and Antisense Oligonucleotides for Diagnosis and Treatment of Hematological Diseases.

Authors:  Valentina Giudice; Francesca Mensitieri; Viviana Izzo; Amelia Filippelli; Carmine Selleri
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Druggable Biochemical Pathways and Potential Therapeutic Alternatives to Target Leukemic Stem Cells and Eliminate the Residual Disease in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Fabien Muselli; Jean-François Peyron; Didier Mary
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Application of Nanotechnology in Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy - A Mini-Review.

Authors:  Cancan Jin; Kankai Wang; Anthony Oppong-Gyebi; Jiangnan Hu
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.