Literature DB >> 29549695

District versus academic hospitals: differences in the clinical characteristics of patients with atrial fibrillation without valvular heart disease treated with oral anticoagulants

Janusz Bednarski, Paweł Balsam, Agata Tymińska, Krzysztof Ozierański, Katarzyna Żukowska, Martyna Zaleska, Katarzyna Szepietowska, Kacper Maciejewski, Michał Peller, Anna Praska-Oginska, Inna Zaboyska, Grzegorz Opolski.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia with a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants are the first‑line drugs in stroke prevention in patients with AF. Oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy may differ between medical centers. OBJECTIVES We compared the clinical characteristics of AF patients treated with OAC in a district and an academic hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed 3528 patients from the multicenter retrospective CRAFT study: 2666 patients from the academic hospital and 862 patients from the district hospital. Their baseline clinical characteristics were compared. RESULTS Patients treated in the district hospital were older (mean [SD] age, 73.9 [10.3] years vs 66.0 [13.4] years; P <0.001) and more likely female (49.1% vs 37.4%; P <0.001). Patients treated in the academic hospital more frequently had paroxysmal AF, while those in the district hospital, permanent AF. The latter group was also more likely to have comorbidities and a higher frequency of previous bleeding episodes or anemia. The groups did not differ regarding kidney function. In both groups, patients were significantly more likely to be on rivaroxaban than on dabigatran. The group treated in the district hospital were at higher risk of thromboembolic events than the other gruop (mean [SD] CHA2DS2VASc score, 4.6 [1.7] vs 3.05 [2.0]; P <0.001), as well as of hemorrhagic events (mean [SD] HASBLED score, 0.6 [0.7] vs 0.4 [0.6]; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS Patients with AF treated with OACs in the district and academic hospitals have different clinical characteristics. Patients treated in the district hospital were older, had more comorbidities, more frequently had permanent AF, and were at higher risk of thromboembolic and bleeding events than patients treated in the academic hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29549695     DOI: 10.20452/pamw.4320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pol Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0032-3772


  2 in total

1.  Randomized controlled clinical trials versus real-life atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants. Do we treat the same patients?

Authors:  Paweł Balsam; Agata Tymińska; Krzysztof Ozierański; Martyna Zaleska; Katarzyna Żukowska; Katarzyna Szepietowska; Kacper Maciejewski; Michał Peller; Marcin Grabowski; Piotr Lodziński; Łukasz Kołtowski; Anna Praska-Ogińska; Inna Zaboyska; Janusz Bednarski; Krzysztof J Filipiak; Grzegorz Opolski
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.737

2.  Evaluation of a pharmacist-led intervention to improve medication adherence in patients initiating dabigatran treatment: a comparison with standard pharmacy practice in Poland.

Authors:  Piotr Merks; Jameason D Cameron; Marcin Balcerzak; Urszula Religioni; Damian Świeczkowski; Mikołaj Konstanty; Dagmara Hering; Filip M Szymański; Milosz Jaguszewski; Régis Vaillancourt
Journal:  BMC Prim Care       Date:  2022-08-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.