Zhihui Zhao1, Zhen Liu1, Zongshan Hu2, Changchun Tseng1, Jie Li1, Wei Pan3, Yong Qiu1, Zezhang Zhu4. 1. Department of Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Zhongshan Road 321, Nanjing, 210008, China. 2. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, Hong Kong. 3. Department of Orthopaedics, The Affiliated Huai'an Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China. 4. Department of Spine Surgery, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Zhongshan Road 321, Nanjing, 210008, China. Zhu_zezhang@126.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the occurrence of PE after intra-operative O-arm navigation-assisted surgery and determine whether the post-operative PE incidence could be decreased by using O-arm navigation as compared to conventional free-hand technique. METHODS: A cohort of 27 patients with spinal deformity who were operated upon with an O-arm navigated system (group A) between 2013 and 2016 were enrolled in the study. A total of 27 curve-matched patients treated by conventional free-hand technique were included as the control group (group B). Whole spine posterior-anterior and lateral radiographs, and CT scans were taken pre and post-operation. Radiologic parameters and volume of PE were measured and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, Cobb angle, and sagittal contour between the two groups pre-operatively. The mean total volume of post-operative PE was significantly larger in the free-hand group (p < 0.001). In the O-arm group, 59 malpositioned screws were identified in 22 patients. In the free-hand group, 88 malpositioned screws were found among 26 patients. The screw perforation rate was higher in the free-hand group than in the O-arm group (p = 0.007). In the O-arm group, the mean volume of PE was significantly larger among patients with malpositioned screws than those without malpositioned screws (p < 0.001), as well as in the free-hand group. CONCLUSION: The volume of PE after correction surgery can be significantly decreased by application of O-arm navigation system as compared to conventional free-hand technique. We ascribed the improvement to the accuracy of screw implantation navigated by O-arm.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the occurrence of PE after intra-operative O-arm navigation-assisted surgery and determine whether the post-operative PE incidence could be decreased by using O-arm navigation as compared to conventional free-hand technique. METHODS: A cohort of 27 patients with spinal deformity who were operated upon with an O-arm navigated system (group A) between 2013 and 2016 were enrolled in the study. A total of 27 curve-matched patients treated by conventional free-hand technique were included as the control group (group B). Whole spine posterior-anterior and lateral radiographs, and CT scans were taken pre and post-operation. Radiologic parameters and volume of PE were measured and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, Cobb angle, and sagittal contour between the two groups pre-operatively. The mean total volume of post-operative PE was significantly larger in the free-hand group (p < 0.001). In the O-arm group, 59 malpositioned screws were identified in 22 patients. In the free-hand group, 88 malpositioned screws were found among 26 patients. The screw perforation rate was higher in the free-hand group than in the O-arm group (p = 0.007). In the O-arm group, the mean volume of PE was significantly larger among patients with malpositioned screws than those without malpositioned screws (p < 0.001), as well as in the free-hand group. CONCLUSION: The volume of PE after correction surgery can be significantly decreased by application of O-arm navigation system as compared to conventional free-hand technique. We ascribed the improvement to the accuracy of screw implantation navigated by O-arm.
Authors: Ji Min Ling; Shree Kumar Dinesh; Boon Chuan Pang; Min Wei Chen; Heng Lip Lim; Danny T Louange; Chun Sing Yu; Chee Meng Ernest Wang Journal: J Clin Neurosci Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: Frank J Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Keith H Bridwell; Stephen Glassman; Michael R Shainline Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2008-09-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Benjamin Phak Boon Tow; Wai Mun Yue; Abhishek Srivastava; Jenn Ming Lai; Chang Ming Guo; Benedict Chan Wearn Peng; John L T Chen; Andy K S Yew; Chusheng Seng; Seang Beng Tan Journal: J Spinal Disord Tech Date: 2015-10