Dipender Gill1, Christopher F Brewer2, Fabiola Del Greco M3, Prasanthi Sivakumaran2, Jack Bowden4, Nuala A Sheehan5, Cosetta Minelli6. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, St. Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK. dipender.gill@imperial.ac.uk. 2. Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, London, UK. 3. Institute for Biomedicine, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy. 4. MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. 5. Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. 6. Population Health and Occupational Disease, NHLI, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pubertal timing has psychological and physical sequelae. While observational studies have demonstrated an association between age at menarche and adult body mass index (BMI), confounding makes it difficult to infer causality. METHODS: The Mendelian randomization (MR) technique is not limited by traditional confounding and was used to investigate the presence of a causal effect of age at menarche on adult BMI. MR uses genetic variants as instruments under the assumption that they act on BMI only through age at menarche (no pleiotropy). Using a two-sample MR approach, heterogeneity between the MR estimates from individual instruments was used as a proxy for pleiotropy, with sensitivity analyses performed if detected. Genetic instruments and estimates of their association with age at menarche were obtained from a genome-wide association meta-analysis on 182,416 women. The genetic effects on adult BMI were estimated using data on 80,465 women from the UK Biobank. The presence of a causal effect of age at menarche on adult BMI was further investigated using data on 70,692 women from the GIANT Consortium. RESULTS: There was evidence of pleiotropy among instruments. Using the UK Biobank data, after removing instruments associated with childhood BMI that were likely exerting pleiotropy, fixed-effect meta-analysis across instruments demonstrated that a 1 year increase in age at menarche reduces adult BMI by 0.38 kg/m2 (95% CI 0.25-0.51 kg/m2). However, evidence of pleiotropy remained. MR-Egger regression did not suggest directional bias, and similar estimates to the fixed-effect meta-analysis were obtained in sensitivity analyses when using a random-effect model, multivariable MR, MR-Egger regression, a weighted median estimator and a weighted mode-based estimator. The direction and significance of the causal effect were replicated using GIANT Consortium data. CONCLUSION: MR provides evidence to support the hypothesis that earlier age at menarche causes higher adult BMI. Complex hormonal and psychological factors may be responsible.
BACKGROUND: Pubertal timing has psychological and physical sequelae. While observational studies have demonstrated an association between age at menarche and adult body mass index (BMI), confounding makes it difficult to infer causality. METHODS: The Mendelian randomization (MR) technique is not limited by traditional confounding and was used to investigate the presence of a causal effect of age at menarche on adult BMI. MR uses genetic variants as instruments under the assumption that they act on BMI only through age at menarche (no pleiotropy). Using a two-sample MR approach, heterogeneity between the MR estimates from individual instruments was used as a proxy for pleiotropy, with sensitivity analyses performed if detected. Genetic instruments and estimates of their association with age at menarche were obtained from a genome-wide association meta-analysis on 182,416 women. The genetic effects on adult BMI were estimated using data on 80,465 women from the UK Biobank. The presence of a causal effect of age at menarche on adult BMI was further investigated using data on 70,692 women from the GIANT Consortium. RESULTS: There was evidence of pleiotropy among instruments. Using the UK Biobank data, after removing instruments associated with childhood BMI that were likely exerting pleiotropy, fixed-effect meta-analysis across instruments demonstrated that a 1 year increase in age at menarche reduces adult BMI by 0.38 kg/m2 (95% CI 0.25-0.51 kg/m2). However, evidence of pleiotropy remained. MR-Egger regression did not suggest directional bias, and similar estimates to the fixed-effect meta-analysis were obtained in sensitivity analyses when using a random-effect model, multivariable MR, MR-Egger regression, a weighted median estimator and a weighted mode-based estimator. The direction and significance of the causal effect were replicated using GIANT Consortium data. CONCLUSION: MR provides evidence to support the hypothesis that earlier age at menarche causes higher adult BMI. Complex hormonal and psychological factors may be responsible.
Authors: Joshua A Bell; David Carslake; Kaitlin H Wade; Rebecca C Richmond; Ryan J Langdon; Emma E Vincent; Michael V Holmes; Nicholas J Timpson; George Davey Smith Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Jun Wang; Anna H Wu; Frank Z Stanczyk; Jacqueline Porcel; Mazen Noureddin; Norah A Terrault; Lynne R Wilkens; Veronica Wendy Setiawan Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2020-08-12 Impact factor: 13.576
Authors: Cosetta Minelli; Diana A van der Plaat; Bénédicte Leynaert; Raquel Granell; Andre F S Amaral; Miguel Pereira; Osama Mahmoud; James Potts; Nuala A Sheehan; Jack Bowden; John Thompson; Debbie Jarvis; George Davey Smith; John Henderson Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2018-08-07 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Jiao Wang; Man Ki Kwok; Shiu Lun Au Yeung; Jie Zhao; Albert Martin Li; Hugh Simon Lam; Gabriel Matthew Leung; Catherine Mary Schooling Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Rebecca B Lawn; Hannah M Sallis; Robyn E Wootton; Amy E Taylor; Perline Demange; Abigail Fraser; Ian S Penton-Voak; Marcus R Munafò Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 3.240