Literature DB >> 29548868

Augmented Reality Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Preliminary Experience.

Francesco Porpiglia1, Cristian Fiori1, Enrico Checcucci1, Daniele Amparore1, Riccardo Bertolo2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To present our preliminary experience with augmented reality robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (AR-RARP). MATERIALS: From June to August 2017, patients candidate to RARP were enrolled and underwent high-resolution multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (1-mm slices) according to dedicated protocol. The obtained three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction was integrated in the robotic console to perform AR-RARP. According to the staging at magnetic resonance imaging or reconstruction, in case of cT2 prostate cancer, intrafascial nerve sparing (NS) was performed: a mark was placed on the prostate capsule to indicate the virtual underlying intraprostatic lesion; in case of cT3, standard NS AR-RARP was scheduled with AR-guided biopsy at the level of suspected extracapsular extension (ECE). Prostate specimens were scanned to assess the 3D model concordance.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients underwent intrafascial NS technique (cT2), whereas 14 underwent standard NS+ selective biopsy of suspected ECE (cT3). Final pathology confirmed clinical staging. Positive surgical margins' rate was 30% (no positive surgical margins in pT2). In patients whose intraprostatic lesions were marked, final pathology confirmed lesion location. In patients with suspected ECE, AR-guided selective biopsies confirmed the ECE location, with 11 of 14 biopsies (78%) positive for prostate cancer. Prostate specimens were scanned with finding of a good overlap. The mismatch between 3D reconstruction and scanning ranged from 1 to 5 mm. In 85% of the entire surface, the mismatch was <3 mm.
CONCLUSION: In our preliminary experience, AR-RARP seems to be safe and effective. The accuracy of 3D reconstruction seemed to be promising. This technology has still limitations: the virtual models are manually oriented and rigid. Future collaborations with bioengineers will allow overcoming these limitations.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29548868     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.01.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  12 in total

1.  3D imaging applications for robotic urologic surgery: an ESUT YAUWP review.

Authors:  Enrico Checcucci; Daniele Amparore; Cristian Fiori; Matteo Manfredi; Morra Ivano; Michele Di Dio; Gabriel Niculescu; Federico Piramide; Giovanni Cattaneo; Pietro Piazzolla; Giovanni Enrico Cacciamani; Riccardo Autorino; Francesco Porpiglia
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  [Application of U-shaped convolutional neural network in auto segmentation and reconstruction of 3D prostate model in laparoscopic prostatectomy navigation].

Authors:  Y Yan; H Z Xia; X S Li; W He; X H Zhu; Z Y Zhang; C L Xiao; Y Q Liu; H Huang; L H He; J Lu
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-06-18

3.  Is this the ultimate solution to fight erectile dysfunction post radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Silvia Secco; Aldo Bocciardi; Mattia Piccinelli; Antonio Galfano
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

Review 4.  Role of MRI in planning radical prostatectomy: what is the added value?

Authors:  Jose Marenco; Clement Orczyk; Tom Collins; Caroline Moore; Mark Emberton
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  The evolution of image guidance in robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP): a glimpse into the future.

Authors:  Joshua Makary; Danielle C van Diepen; Ranjan Arianayagam; George McClintock; Jeremy Fallot; Scott Leslie; Ruban Thanigasalam
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-09-04

6.  Augmented reality during parotid surgery: real-life evaluation of voice control of a head mounted display.

Authors:  Claudia Scherl; David Männle; Nicole Rotter; Jürgen Hesser; Jan Stallkamp; Tobias Balkenhol; Lena Huber; Benedikt Kramer; Anne Lammert; Annette Affolter
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 3.236

7.  Augmented reality with HoloLens in parotid surgery: how to assess and to improve accuracy.

Authors:  Claudia Scherl; Johanna Stratemeier; Celine Karle; Nicole Rotter; Jürgen Hesser; Lena Huber; Andre Dias; Oliver Hoffmann; Philipp Riffel; Stefan O Schoenberg; Angela Schell; Anne Lammert; Annette Affolter; David Männle
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Three-dimensional printing versus conventional machining in the creation of a meatal urethral dilator: development and mechanical testing.

Authors:  Michael Y Chen; Jacob Skewes; Ryan Daley; Maria A Woodruff; Nicholas J Rukin
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Real-time navigation by three-dimensional virtual reconstruction models in robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: our initial experience.

Authors:  Sida Cheng; Xinfei Li; Weijie Zhu; Wanqiang Li; Jie Wang; Jian Yang; Jingyun Wu; He Wang; Lei Zhang; Xuesong Li; Liqun Zhou
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-01

10.  A Novel Precise Optical Navigation System for Craniomaxillofacial Surgery Registered With an Occlusal Splint.

Authors:  Yikang Hou; Gang Chai; Zuoliang Qi
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb 01       Impact factor: 1.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.