Literature DB >> 29548259

Does rural generalist focused medical school and family medicine training make a difference? Memorial University of Newfoundland outcomes.

James Rourke1, Shabnam Asghari2, Oliver Hurley3, Mohamed Ravalia4, Michael Jong5, Wendy Graham6, Wanda Parsons7, Norah Duggan8, Danielle O'Keefe9, Scott Moffatt10, Katherine Stringer11, Carolyn Sturge Sparkes12, Janelle Hippe13, Kristin Harris Walsh14, Donald McKay15, Asoka Samarasena16.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Rural recruitment and retention of physicians is a global issue. The Faculty of Medicine at Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada, was established as a rural-focused medical school with a social accountability mandate that aimed to meet the healthcare needs of a sparse population distributed over a large landmass as well as the needs of other rural and remote areas of Canada. This study aimed to assess whether Memorial medical degree (MD) and postgraduate (PG) programs were effective at producing physicians for their province and rural physicians for Canada compared with other Canadian medical schools.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included medical school graduates who completed their PG training between 2004 and 2013 in Canada. Practice locations of study subjects were georeferenced and assigned to three geographic classes: Large Urban; Small City/Town; and Rural. Analyses were performed at two levels. (1) Provincial level analysis compared Memorial PG graduates practicing where they received their MD and/or PG training with other medical schools who are the only medical school in their province (n=4). (2) National-level analysis compared Memorial PG graduates practicing in rural Canada with all other Canadian medical schools (n=16). Descriptive and bivariate analyses were performed.
RESULTS: Overall, 18 766 physicians practicing in Canada completed Canadian PG training (2004-2013), and of those, 8091 (43%) completed Family Medicine (FM) training. Of all physicians completing Canadian PG training, 1254 (7%) physicians were practicing rurally and of those, 1076 were family physicians. There were 379 Memorial PG graduates and of those, 208 (55%) completed FM training and 72 (19%) were practicing rurally, and of those practicing rurally, 56 were family physicians. At the national level, the percentage of all Memorial PG graduates (19.0%) and FM PG graduates (26.9%) practicing rurally was significantly better than the national average for PG (6.4%, p<0.000) and FM (12.9%, p<0.000). Among 391 physicians practicing in Newfoundland and Labrador (NL), 257 (65.7%) were Memorial PG graduates and 247 (63.2%) were Memorial MD graduates. Of the 163 FM graduates, 148 (90.8%) were Memorial FM graduates and 118 (72.4%) were Memorial MD graduates. Of the 68 in rural practice, 51 (75.0%) were Memorial PG graduates and 31 (45.6%) were Memorial MD graduates. Of the 41 FM graduates in rural practice, 39 (95.1%) were Memorial FM graduates and 22 (53.7%) were Memorial MD graduates. Two-sample proportion tests demonstrated Memorial University provided a larger proportion of its provincial physician resource supply than the other four single provincial medical schools, by medical school MD for FM (72.4% vs 44.3%, p<0.000) and for overall (63.2% vs 43.5% p<0.000), and by medical school PG for FM (90.8 % vs 72.0%, p<0.000).
CONCLUSION: This study found Memorial University graduates were more likely to establish practice in rural areas compared with the national average for most program types as well as more likely to establish practice in NL compared with other single medical schools' graduates in their provinces. This study highlights the impact a comprehensive rural-focused social accountability approach can have at supplying the needs of a population both at the regional and rural national levels.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Memorial University of Newfoundland; family medicine residency; medical education; pipeline to practice; rural general practice; rural generalist physician; rural medical education; rural practice; social accountability; Canada

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29548259     DOI: 10.22605/RRH4426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rural Remote Health        ISSN: 1445-6354            Impact factor:   1.759


  4 in total

Review 1.  Reviewing reliance on overseas-trained doctors in rural Australia and planning for self-sufficiency: applying 10 years' MABEL evidence.

Authors:  Belinda O'Sullivan; Deborah J Russell; Matthew R McGrail; Anthony Scott
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2019-01-22

2.  Time to revisit the skills and competencies required to work in rural general hospitals.

Authors:  Cormac Doyle; Chris Isles; Pauline Wilson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Medical education interventions influencing physician distribution into underserved communities: a scoping review.

Authors:  Asiana Elma; Muhammadhasan Nasser; Laurie Yang; Irene Chang; Dorothy Bakker; Lawrence Grierson
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2022-04-07

4.  Ongoing recruitment crisis In Norwegian general practice.

Authors:  Svein R Kjosavik
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 2.581

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.