Literature DB >> 29547899

Favourable outcomes in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer operated on by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Robert Dziedzic1, Tomasz Marjanski1, Franciszek Binczyk2, Joanna Polanska2, Wioletta Sawicka3, Witold Rzyman1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approach has become a standard for the treatment of early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recently published meta-analyses proved the benefit of VATS versus thoracotomy for overall survival (OS) and reduction of postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to compare early outcomes, long-term survival and rate of postoperative complications of the VATS approach versus thoracotomy.
METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analysed 982 individuals who underwent surgical resection for Stage I-IIA NSCLC between 2007 and 2015. Thirty- and 90-day mortality rates, length of hospital stay, rate of complications and OS were assessed. Propensity score matching was performed to compare 2 groups of patients. Two hundred and twenty-five individuals from the thoracotomy group and 225 patients from the VATS group were matched regarding pTNM, sex, the Charlson comorbidity index, type of resection and histological diagnosis.
RESULTS: In the propensity score-matched patient group, the VATS approach was associated with a significant benefit regarding OS (P = 0.042). Although no significant difference was observed (P = 0.14) in the 3-year survival rate of patients who had a thoracotomy versus VATS, the 5-year survival rate among patients with VATS increased significantly (61% vs 78%, P = 0.0081). The adjusted VATS-related hazard ratio for pTNM, sex and age was 0.63 (95% confidence interval 0.40-0.98). The VATS surgical approach also reduced both the rate of postoperative atelectasis (4% for VATS vs 10% for open thoracotomy; P = 0.0052) and the need for blood transfusions (4% vs 12% respectively, P = 0.0054) and significantly shortened the postoperative length of stay (mean 7.25 vs 9.34 days, P < 0.0001). No significant differences in the 30-day mortality (1% vs 1%, P = 0.66) and 90-day mortality (1% vs 1%, P = 0.48) rates were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with early-stage NSCLC operated on with VATS had fewer complications, shorter postoperative length of stay and better OS compared to those who were operated on by thoracotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29547899     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of the Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery versus Open Thoracotomy Bronchial Sleeve Lobectomy for Central Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yanbo Yang; Jiandong Mei; Feng Lin; Qiang Pu; Lin Ma; Chengwu Liu; Yunke Zhu; Chenglin Guo; Liang Xia; Lunxu Liu
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Oncologic validity of minimally invasive lobectomy for early stage lung cancer.

Authors:  Todd L Demmy; Sai Yendamuri
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Establishment of Minimal Clinically Important Improvement for Patient-Reported Symptoms to Define Recovery After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Wei Xu; Wei Dai; Zhen Gao; Xin Shelley Wang; Li Tang; Yang Pu; Qingsong Yu; Hongfan Yu; Yuxian Nie; Weitao Zhuang; Guibin Qiao; Charles S Cleeland; Qiuling Shi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-04-03       Impact factor: 4.339

4.  Multiport and uniportal VATS sleeve resections.

Authors:  Gregor J Kocher
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Long-term survival outcomes of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for stage I-II non-small cell lung cancer are more favorable than thoracotomy: a propensity score-matched analysis from a high-volume center in China.

Authors:  Jiandong Mei; Chenglin Guo; Liang Xia; Hu Liao; Qiang Pu; Lin Ma; Chengwu Liu; Yunke Zhu; Feng Lin; Zhenyu Yang; Kejia Zhao; Guowei Che; Lunxu Liu
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-04

6.  Comparison of robotic-assisted lobectomy with video-assisted thoracic surgery for stage IIB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Chongwu Li; Yingjie Hu; Jia Huang; Jiantao Li; Long Jiang; Hao Lin; Peiji Lu; Qingquan Luo
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12

7.  Uniportal versus multiportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer.

Authors:  Mamdoh Al-Ameri; Erik Sachs; Ulrik Sartipy; Veronica Jackson
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open thoracotomy lobectomy: a Swedish nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Mamdoh Al-Ameri; Per Bergman; Anders Franco-Cereceda; Ulrik Sartipy
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Worse outcomes after conversion of thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Piotr Gabryel; Cezary Piwkowski; Mariusz Kasprzyk; Paweł Zieliński; Magdalena Roszak; Wojciech Dyszkiewicz
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-08

10.  Short- and long-term outcomes of thoracoscopic pneumonectomy - single center experience.

Authors:  Cezary Piwkowski; Piotr Gabryel; Magdalena Roszak; Bartłomiej Perek; Mariusz Kasprzyk
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 1.195

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.