Mark O Wielpütz1,2,3,4, Ho Yun Lee1,2,5, Hisanobu Koyama6,7, Takeshi Yoshikawa1,2, Shinichiro Seki1,2, Yuji Kishida6, Yasuhiro Sakai8, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor3,4, Kazuro Sugimura6, Yoshiharu Ohno1,6,9. 1. 1 Department of Radiology, Division of Functional and Diagnostic Imaging Research, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan. 2. 2 Advanced Biomedical Imaging Research Center, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan. 3. 3 Translational Lung Research Center, University of Heidelberg, German Center for Lung Research, Heidelberg, Germany. 4. 4 Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany. 5. 5 Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. 6. 6 Department of Radiology, Division of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan. 7. 7 Department of Radiology, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan. 8. 8 Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan. 9. 9 Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Ultrashort TE (UTE) MRI has been shown to deliver high-resolution images comparable to CT images. Here we evaluate the potential of UTE-MRI for precise lung nodule characterization. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients (mean [± SD] age, 68.7 ± 10.8 years) with 119 nodules or masses (mean size, 17.4 ± 16.3 mm; range, 4-88 mm) prospectively underwent CT (1-mm slice thickness) and UTE-MRI (TE, 192 μs; 1 mm3 resolution). Two radiologists assessed nodule dimensions and morphologic features (i.e., attenuation, margins, and internal lucencies), in consensus for CT and in a blinded fashion for UTE-MRI. Sensitivity, specificity, and kappa statistics were calculated in reference to CT. RESULTS: Readers 1 and 2 underestimated the nodules' long axial diameter with UTEMRI by 1.2 ± 3.4 and 2.1 ± 4.2 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of UTE-MRI for subsolid attenuation were 95.9% and 70.3%, respectively, for reader 1 and 97.1% and 71.4%, respectively, for reader 2 (κ = 0.71 and 0.68). With regard to margin characteristics, for lobulation, sensitivity was 70.6% and 54.9%, and specificity was 93.2% and 96.3% for readers 1 and 2, respectively; for spiculation, sensitivity was 61.5% and 48.0%, and specificity was 95.2% and 95.0%; and for pleural tags, sensitivity was 87.0% and 73.3%, and specificity was 93.8% and 95.0%. Finally, for internal lucencies, sensitivity was 72.7% and 61.3%, and specificity was 96.1% and 97.3% for readers 1 and 2, respectively (κ = 0.64-0.81 for reader 1 and 0.48-0.72 for reader 2). Interreader agreement for attenuation, margin characteristics, and lucencies was substantial to almost perfect with few exceptions (κ = 0.51-0.90). CONCLUSION: UTE-MRI systematically underestimated dimension measurements by approximately 1-2 mm but otherwise showed high diagnostic properties and interreader agreement, yet unprecedented by MRI, for nodule morphologic assessment.
OBJECTIVE: Ultrashort TE (UTE) MRI has been shown to deliver high-resolution images comparable to CT images. Here we evaluate the potential of UTE-MRI for precise lung nodule characterization. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients (mean [± SD] age, 68.7 ± 10.8 years) with 119 nodules or masses (mean size, 17.4 ± 16.3 mm; range, 4-88 mm) prospectively underwent CT (1-mm slice thickness) and UTE-MRI (TE, 192 μs; 1 mm3 resolution). Two radiologists assessed nodule dimensions and morphologic features (i.e., attenuation, margins, and internal lucencies), in consensus for CT and in a blinded fashion for UTE-MRI. Sensitivity, specificity, and kappa statistics were calculated in reference to CT. RESULTS: Readers 1 and 2 underestimated the nodules' long axial diameter with UTEMRI by 1.2 ± 3.4 and 2.1 ± 4.2 mm, respectively (p < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of UTE-MRI for subsolid attenuation were 95.9% and 70.3%, respectively, for reader 1 and 97.1% and 71.4%, respectively, for reader 2 (κ = 0.71 and 0.68). With regard to margin characteristics, for lobulation, sensitivity was 70.6% and 54.9%, and specificity was 93.2% and 96.3% for readers 1 and 2, respectively; for spiculation, sensitivity was 61.5% and 48.0%, and specificity was 95.2% and 95.0%; and for pleural tags, sensitivity was 87.0% and 73.3%, and specificity was 93.8% and 95.0%. Finally, for internal lucencies, sensitivity was 72.7% and 61.3%, and specificity was 96.1% and 97.3% for readers 1 and 2, respectively (κ = 0.64-0.81 for reader 1 and 0.48-0.72 for reader 2). Interreader agreement for attenuation, margin characteristics, and lucencies was substantial to almost perfect with few exceptions (κ = 0.51-0.90). CONCLUSION: UTE-MRI systematically underestimated dimension measurements by approximately 1-2 mm but otherwise showed high diagnostic properties and interreader agreement, yet unprecedented by MRI, for nodule morphologic assessment.
Authors: Emeline Darçot; Mario Jreige; David C Rotzinger; Stacey Gidoin Tuyet Van; Alessio Casutt; Jean Delacoste; Julien Simons; Olivier Long; Flore Buela; Jean-Baptiste Ledoux; John O Prior; Alban Lovis; Catherine Beigelman-Aubry Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-04-28
Authors: Franz Wolfgang Hirsch; Ina Sorge; Jens Vogel-Claussen; Christian Roth; Daniel Gräfe; Anne Päts; Andreas Voskrebenzev; Rebecca Marie Anders Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2020-01-29
Authors: Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn; Ashkan A Malayeri; Elizabeth C Jones; Joel Moss; Kevin P Fennelly; Kenneth N Olivier; Marcus Y Chen Journal: Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging Date: 2021-06-10