Literature DB >> 29546441

Changes in trauma admission rates and mechanisms during recession and recovery: evidence from the Detroit metropolitan area.

Kimberly Coughlin1, R David Hayward2, Mary Fessler2, Elango Edhayan2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although individual socioeconomic status has been linked with risk of traumatic injury, there has been relatively little research into the question of how economic changes may impact trauma admission rates in neighborhoods with different socioeconomic backgrounds.
METHODS: This study pairs ZIP code-level data on trauma admissions with county-level data on unemployment to assess differences in the type of changes experienced in more and less affluent neighborhoods of the Detroit metropolitan area between 2006 and 2014.
RESULTS: Conditional linear growth curve modeling results indicate that trauma admission rates decreased during the "great recession" of 2008-2010 in neighborhoods with the highest unemployment levels, but increased during the same period of time in neighborhoods with lower unemployment. Consequently, citywide disparities in trauma incidence decreased during the recession and widened again as the economy began to improve.
CONCLUSION: Trauma risks and demand for trauma care may shift geographically in relation to broader economic changes. Health care policy and planning should consider these dynamics when anticipating changing demands and needs for efforts at prevention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Growth curve modeling; Health disparities; Traumatic injury; Unemployment

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29546441     DOI: 10.1007/s00038-018-1087-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Public Health        ISSN: 1661-8556            Impact factor:   3.380


  15 in total

1.  Socioeconomic status and the occurrence of fatal and nonfatal injury in the United States.

Authors:  C Cubbin; F B LeClere; G S Smith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention.

Authors:  Laurence Z Rubenstein
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 10.668

3.  The epidemiology of firearm violence in the twenty-first century United States.

Authors:  Garen J Wintemute
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 21.981

4.  Deaths from unintentional injury among adults aged 65 and over: United States, 2000-2013.

Authors:  Ellen Kramarow; Li-Hui Chen; Holly Hedegaard; Margaret Warner
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2015-05

5.  Pilot study on the comprehensive economic costs of major trauma: Consequential costs are well in excess of medical costs.

Authors:  Jean-Marc C Haeusler; Benno Tobler; Beat Arnet; Juerg Huesler; Heinz Zimmermann
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2006-09

6.  Gender differences in work-related injury/illness: analysis of workers compensation claims.

Authors:  S S Islam; A M Velilla; E J Doyle; A M Ducatman
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.214

7.  Rates of unemployment and penetrating trauma are correlated.

Authors:  Justin A Reed; R Stephen Smith; Stephen D Helmer; Brent A Lancaster; Claudia G Carman
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 0.954

8.  Disparities in health care are driven by where minority patients seek care: examination of the hospital quality alliance measures.

Authors:  Romana Hasnain-Wynia; David W Baker; David Nerenz; Joe Feinglass; Anne C Beal; Mary Beth Landrum; Raj Behal; Joel S Weissman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-06-25

9.  Why have fatality rates among older drivers declined? The relative contributions of changes in survivability and crash involvement.

Authors:  Jessica B Cicchino
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2015-07-26

10.  Regional socioeconomic disparities in outcomes for workers with low back pain in the United States.

Authors:  Mujahed Shraim; Manuel Cifuentes; Joanna L Willetts; Helen R Marucci-Wellman; Glenn Pransky
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 2.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.