Literature DB >> 29546432

Factors affecting choice of sponsoring institution for residency among medical students in Singapore.

Chew Lip Ng1, Xuan Dao Liu2, Renuka Murali Govind3, Jonathan Wei Jian Tan4, Shirley Beng Suat Ooi5,6, Sophia Archuleta7,8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Postgraduate medical education in Singapore underwent a major transition recently, from a British-style system and accreditation to a competency-based residency programme modelled after the American system. We aimed to identify the relative importance of factors influencing the choice of sponsoring institution (SI) for residency among medical students during this transition period.
METHODS: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study of Singapore undergraduate medical students across all years of study was performed in 2011. Participants rated the degree of importance of 45 factors (including research, academia and education, marketing, reputation of faculty, working conditions, posting experience and influence by peers/seniors) to their choice of SIs on a five-point Likert scale. Differences in gender and seniority were compared.
RESULTS: 705 out of 1,274 students completed the survey (response rate 55.3%). The top five influencing factors were guidance by mentor (4.48 ± 0.74), reputation for good teaching (4.46 ± 0.76), personal overall experience in SI (4.41 ± 0.88), quality of mentorship and supervision (4.41 ± 0.75), and quality and quantity of teaching (4.37 ± 0.78). The five lowest-rated factors were social networking (2.91 ± 1.00), SI security (3.01 ± 1.07), open house impact (3.15 ± 0.96), advertising paraphernalia (3.17 ± 0.95) and research publications (3.21 ± 1.00). Female students attributed more importance to security and a positive working environment. Preclinical students rated research and marketing aspects more highly, while clinical students valued a positive working environment more.
CONCLUSION: Quality of education, mentorship, experiences during clerkship and a positive working environment were the most important factors influencing the choice of SI. Copyright: © Singapore Medical Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACGME-I; factors; medical students; residency

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29546432      PMCID: PMC6301875          DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2018024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  10 in total

1.  Burnout during residency training: a literature review.

Authors:  Waguih William Ishak; Sara Lederer; Carla Mandili; Rose Nikravesh; Laurie Seligman; Monisha Vasa; Dotun Ogunyemi; Carol A Bernstein
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2009-12

2.  Mentorship in otolaryngology residency: the resident perspective.

Authors:  Amy K Hsu; Abtin Tabaee; Mark S Persky
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Emergency medicine residency selection: factors influencing candidate decisions.

Authors:  Melissa DeSantis; Catherine A Marco
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Mentorship in postgraduate training programmes: views of Canadian programme directors.

Authors:  Andrea Donovan; Jeff Donovan
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  Factors affecting medical students' selection of an internal medicine residency program.

Authors:  Eva M Aagaard; Katherine Julian; Julien Dedier; Ira Soloman; Jan Tillisch; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  The successful, rapid transition to a new model of graduate medical education in Singapore.

Authors:  Paul J Huggan; Dujeepa D Samarasekara; Sophia Archuleta; See Meng Khoo; Joe Heng Joo Sim; Clara Siew Ping Sin; Shirley Beng Suat Ooi
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Factors affecting choice of surgical residency training program.

Authors:  K L Mayer; R V Perez; H S Ho
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 8.  Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dario Sambunjak; Sharon E Straus; Ana Marusić
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Junior faculty members' mentoring relationships and their professional development in U.S. medical schools.

Authors:  A Palepu; R H Friedman; R C Barnett; P L Carr; A S Ash; L Szalacha; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  "Having the right chemistry": a qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine.

Authors:  Vicki A Jackson; Anita Palepu; Laura Szalacha; Cheryl Caswell; Phyllis L Carr; Thomas Inui
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.893

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Winds of change in medical education in Singapore: what does the future hold?

Authors:  Lionel Hon Wai Lum; Kian-Keong Poh; Paul Anantharajah Tambyah
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.858

2.  Medical students' attitudes towards and views of general practice careers in Singapore: a cross-sectional survey and qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Yang Fang; Michael Soljak; Shawn Lien Ler Tan; Helen E Smith
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Urology Residency Match in Singapore.

Authors:  Yi Quan Tan; Xiang Wen Gregory Pek; Ziting Wang; Ho Yee Tiong; Edmund Chiong
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.649

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.