Literature DB >> 29546372

Digestible methionine+cysteine in the diet of commercial layers and its influence on the performance, quality, and amino acid profile of eggs and economic evaluation.

T S M Carvalho1, L S Sousa1, F A Nogueira1, D P Vaz1, M M Saldanha1, M V Triginelli1, M F V S Pinto1, N C Baião1, L J C Lara1.   

Abstract

This work aimed at evaluating the effects of 4 digestible Met+Cys levels on the diet of commercial layers and their influence on the productive performance, quality, and amino acid profile of eggs and economic viability of the activity. A total of 576 white Lohmann LSL-Lite layers was distributed into 6 replicates of 24 birds for each diet. The experimental design was completely randomized, with 4 treatments defined by levels evaluated in the feed (0.465, 0.540, 0.581, and 0.647%). The productive performance was measured for 30 weeks. The quality (34 and 50 wk old) and the amino acid profile of eggs (43 wk old) also were evaluated. A linear positive response was observed at higher Met+Cys levels for feed intake, number of eggs per housed bird, and digestible Met+Cys intake. Egg production, egg weight, egg mass, feed efficiency, and weight gain had their optimal values determined by the quadratic regression model at 0.638, 0.654, 0.647, 0.644, and 0.613% digestible Met+Cys, respectively. In the 34th wk, eggshell thickness decreased linearly at higher Met+Cys levels. In the 50th week, the optimal levels detected for eggshell thickness and percentage were 0.571 and 0.570% digestible Met+Cys, respectively. The percentages of proteins, branched-chain amino acids (leucine, isoleucine, and valine), histidine, and proline in eggs (albumen+yolk) showed a linear negative response in function of higher Met+Cys levels. Higher digestible Met+Cys levels (>0.630%) led to a good performance of layers, while lower Met+Cys levels improved the eggshell quality of layers in peak production. Optimal Met+Cys levels may change according to the price of the synthetic amino acid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29546372     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pey036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  7 in total

1.  Use of encapsulated L-lysine-HCl and DL-methionine improves postprandial amino acid balance in laying hens.

Authors:  Mingfa Sun; Jingpeng Zhao; Xiaojuan Wang; Hongchao Jiao; Hai Lin
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Protein and Amino Acid Content in Four Brands of Commercial Table Eggs in Retail Markets in Relation to Human Requirements.

Authors:  Youssef A Attia; Mohammed A Al-Harthi; Mohamed A Korish; Mohamed H Shiboob
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 3.231

Review 3.  Amino acid requirements for laying hens: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Shemil P Macelline; Mehdi Toghyani; Peter V Chrystal; Peter H Selle; Sonia Yun Liu
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Effect of Methionine Deficiency on the Growth Performance, Serum Amino Acids Concentrations, Gut Microbiota and Subsequent Laying Performance of Layer Chicks.

Authors:  Yafei Liu; Dehua Wang; Lihong Zhao; Jianyun Zhang; Shimeng Huang; Qiugang Ma
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-04-25

5.  Effects of DL and L-Methionine on Growth Rate, Feather Growth, and Hematological Parameters of Tetra-SL Layers from 1-28 Days of Age.

Authors:  James Kachungwa Lugata; János Oláh; Xénia Erika Ozsváth; Renáta Knop; Eszter Angyal; Csaba Szabó
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 3.231

6.  Response of laying hens to l-arginine, l-citrulline and guanidinoacetic acid supplementation in reduced protein diet.

Authors:  Hiep Thi Dao; Nishchal K Sharma; Emma J Bradbury; Robert A Swick
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2021-03-12

7.  Concentration of egg white antimicrobial and immunomodulatory proteins is related to eggshell pigmentation across traditional chicken breeds.

Authors:  Veronika Gvoždíková Javůrková; Monika Pokorná; Ivan Mikšík; Eva Tůmová
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.352

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.