| Literature DB >> 29546039 |
Christine Ludwin Wanjala1,2, Eliningaya J Kweka3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malaria vector control efforts have taken malaria related cases down to appreciable number per annum after large scale of intervention tools. Insecticides-based tools remain the major control option for malaria vectors in Kenya and, therefore, the potential of such programs to be compromised by the reported insecticide resistance is of major concern. The objective of this study was to evaluate the status of insecticide resistance in malaria vectors in different agro ecosystems from western Kenya.Entities:
Keywords: Ahero; Anopheles gambiae; Emutete; Kabula; Kisian; control; malaria; resistance
Year: 2018 PMID: 29546039 PMCID: PMC5838019 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00055
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1Map of study sites in western Kenya.
Figure 2Anopheles gambiae s.l. mortalities against different insecticides and study sites. (A) Mortalities against different formulation of pyrethroid insecticides: deltamethrin, permethrin, and lambdacyhalothrin; (B) mortalities against DDT (Organochlorine), bendiocarb (Carbamate), and Malathion (Organophosphate). Kisumu strain was used as control.
Figure 3Fold change in the monooxygenases (P450) levels (±SE) in resistant mosquitoes against susceptible mosquitoes from the same study site.
Figure 4Fold changes in esterase levels (±SE) in resistant mosquitoes against susceptible mosquitoes from the same study site.
Figure 5Fold changes in GST levels (±SE) in resistant mosquitoes against susceptible mosquitoes from the same study site.
Species composition at different study sites.
| Study site | Not determined (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ahero | 56 | 89.3 | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Kisian | 225 | 64.4 | 32.9 | 2.4 |
| Chulaimbo | 100 | 24.0 | 72.0 | 4.0 |
| Emutete | 200 | 3.5 | 94.0 | 2.5 |
| Emakakha | 61 | 3.3 | 93.4 | 3.3 |
| Iguhu | 300 | 8.0 | 88.0 | 4.0 |
| Kabula | 60 | 3.3 | 90.0 | 6.7 |
Genotype and allele frequencies of knockdown resistance (kdr) at the seven study sites in western Kenya.
| Study site | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LL | LS | SS | Frequency | χ2 | |||
| Ahero | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | – | – |
| Kisian | 50 | 32 | 3 | 15 | 30.0 | 37.35 | <0.0001 |
| Chulaimbo | 56 | 2 | 4 | 50 | 89.3 | 11.93 | <0.0001 |
| Emutete | 87 | 7 | 4 | 76 | 87.3 | 49.22 | <0.0001 |
| Emakakha | 57 | 1 | 7 | 49 | 85.9 | 1.38 | 0.24 |
| Iguhu | 108 | 10 | 7 | 91 | 84.3 | 53.48 | <0.0001 |
| Kabula | 53 | 5 | 5 | 43 | 81.1 | 19.83 | <0.0001 |
| Ahero | 50 | 46 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.09 | 0.77 |
| Kisian | 42 | 41 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.01 | 0.94 |
| Chulaimbo | 23 | 14 | 0 | 9 | 39.1 | 23.00 | <0.0001 |
| Emutete | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – |
| Emakakha | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | – | – |
| Iguhu | 16 | 15 | 1 | 0 | 3.1 | 0.02 | 0.90 |
| Kabula | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 33.3 | – | – |
N is sample size, LL represents wild type, LS represents heterozygote mutation, SS represents homozygote mutation,” and frequency is the mutation allele frequency (%). Symbol “–” stands for not done. χ.