| Literature DB >> 29545836 |
Michel Geffard1, Arturo Mangas1,2,3, Denis Bedat1, Rafael Coveñas3.
Abstract
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease that currently has no cure. At present, the only approved treatment for ALS is Riluzole, a glutamate release blocker that improves life expectancy by 3-6 months. ALS-Endotherapia (GEMALS) is a novel therapeutic approach to treat ALS and the aim of the present study was to investigate the potential beneficial effects of this novel treatment. A total of 31 patients with ALS were assessed in the current study. Deceleration of the disease was observed in 83.87% (P<0.0001) of patients and mean life expectancy was increased by 38 months. Motor functions, including breathing, walking, salivation, speech, swallowing and writing, were also improved in patients treated with GEMALS. The results of the present study demonstrate that long-term treatment with GEMALS has a curative effect in patients with ALS. Furthermore, the overall effectiveness of GEMALS was assessed using the ALS Assessment Questionnaire. The score improvement was 76.2 and 100% for men and women, respectively (P<0.0001), compared with the worldwide reference score. The present study provides a promising basis for the use of GEMALS as a therapeutic treatment for patients with ALS; however, these results must be confirmed in a double-blinded and randomized clinical trial.Entities:
Keywords: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; endotherapia; human; poly-L-lysine
Year: 2018 PMID: 29545836 PMCID: PMC5841048 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.5868
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Data for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the present study.
| Diagnosis | GEMALS start | GEMALS end | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient (sex) | Date | Age (years) | Score | Age (years) | Score | Age (years) | Duration of treatment (months) |
| 1 (M) | 11/09 | 62 | 35.5 | 62 | 15 | 66 | 36 |
| 2 (M) | 01/08 | 60 | 31 | 63 | 13 | 65 | 28 |
| 3 (M) | 03/10 | 53 | 37 | 53 | 14.5 | 56 | 32 |
| 4 (F) | – | – | 17 | 64 | 15 | 64 | 7 |
| 5 (F) | 05/10 | 72 | 33 | 73 | 16 | 75 | 27 |
| 6 (F) | 01/09 | 59 | 12 | 60 | 12 | 62 | 19 |
| 7 (M) | 2007 | 65 | 27 | 69 | 23 | 71 | 23 |
| 8 (F) | 10/08 | 68 | 16 | 71 | 6 | 73 | 19 |
| 9 (M) | 09/10 | 36 | 28 | 38 | 20 | 39 | 9 |
| 10 (M) | 01/94 | 47 | 12 | 62 | 11 | 66 | 48 |
| 11 (M) | 01/04 | 53 | 33 | 60 | 35.5 | 63 | 36 |
| 12 (M) | 08/03 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 6.5 | 49 | 110 |
| 13 (M) | 01/94 | 47 | 12 | 62 | 11 | 66 | 48 |
| 14 (M) | 01/01 | 57 | 40 | 57 | 6 | 69 | 140 |
| 15 (M) | – | – | 35 | 74 | 27 | 76 | 15 |
| 16 (F) | – | – | 27.5 | 80 | 24 | 82 | 15 |
| 17 (M) | 03/08 | 44 | 31 | 46 | 17 | 49 | 24 |
| 18 (F) | 01/09 | 55 | 34 | 57 | 22 | 59 | 19 |
| 19 (F) | – | – | 37 | 63 | 32 | 64 | 11 |
| 20 (M) | 06/07 | 65 | 33 | 69 | 25 | 71 | 32 |
| 21 (M) | 07/07 | 61 | 34 | 65 | 18 | 67 | 26 |
| 22 (F) | – | – | 38 | 59 | 34.5 | 60 | 13 |
| 23 (M) | 02/08 | 73 | 37 | 74 | 25 | 76 | 21 |
| 24 (M) | 08/05 | 58 | 32 | 61 | 28 | 63 | 25 |
| 25 (F) | 11/08 | 44 | 35 | 47 | 36 | 49 | 28 |
| 26 (M) | 04/10 | 62 | 26 | 64 | 12 | 64 | 9 |
| 27 (M) | 12/11 | 68 | 27 | 70 | 23 | 70 | 3 |
| 28 (M) | 03/11 | 58 | 34 | 59 | 34 | 60 | 8 |
| 29 (M) | 07/07 | 57 | 29 | 59 | 17 | 63 | 50 |
| 30 (F) | 03/07 | 32 | 39 | 33 | 0 | 38 | 66 |
| 31 (M) | 01/01 | 46 | 20 | 53 | 28 | 58 | 57 |
M, male; F, female; GEMALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-Endotherapia.
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-Endotherapia constituents.
| PLL constituents | Final concentration (M) |
|---|---|
| Glucosamine-PLL | 1×10−04 |
| Agmatine-PLL | 1×10−04 |
| Uric acid-PLL | 1×10−04 |
| α-Tocopherol-PLL | 3×10−05 |
| Ascorbic acid-PLL | 3×10−05 |
| CoEnzyme Q10-PLL-oleic acid | 3×10−05 |
| Retinoic acid-PLL-oleic acid | 3×10−05 |
| Pantothenic acid-PLL | 3×10−05 |
| Biotin-PLL | 3×10−05 |
| Oleic acid-PLL-thioctic acid | 1×10−04 |
| Oleic acid-PLL-myristic acid | 1×10−04 |
| Oleic acid-PLL-lauric acid | 1×10−04 |
| Oleic acid-PLL-linoleic acid | 1×10−04 |
| Oleic acid-PLL-palmitic acid | 1×10−04 |
| Oleic acid-PLL-palmitoleic acid | 1×10−04 |
| Lauric acid-PLL-caprylic acid | 1×10−04 |
| T-T-Farnesyl-L. cysteine-PLL-palmitic acid | 1×10−04 |
| Cholesterol-PLL-oleic acid | 1×10−04 |
| L. Cysteine-PLL | 2×10−04 |
| Taurine-PLL | 2×10−04 |
| L. Methionine-PLL | 2×10−04 |
| L. Glutathione-PLL | 1×10−04 |
PLL, poly-L-lysine.
Figure 1.(A) Proportion of patients that experienced deceleration, degradation and improvement. (B) Success and failure rates of treatment. n=31.
Effects of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-Endotherapia treatment (n=31).
| No. patients (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evolution | Male (n=21) | Female (n=10) | Total | Success (%) | P-value |
| Improvement | 2 (9.52) | 2 (20.00) | 4 (12.90) | 26/31 (83.87) | <0.0001 |
| Deceleration | 14 (66.67) | 8 (80.00) | 22 (70.97) | ||
| Degradation | 5 (23.80) | 0 (0) | 5 (16.13) | ||
Success rate=(improvement + deceleration)/total. The P-value presented in this table is for success rate vs. degradation.
Figure 2.Mean change in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire score. M, patients treated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-endotherapia in the present study; R, worldwide reference score. An increase in life expectancy of 38 months was observed in patients treated with GEMALS (score M) in comparison with worldwide reference score (score R). ***P=0.0002.
Scores according to each item.
| Item | Inclusion | M | R |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speech | 2.9±1.4 | 2.3±1.7[ | 1.2±1.1 |
| Salivation | 3.3±0.9 | 2.6±1.4[ | 1.3±1.1 |
| Swallowing | 3.4±0.9 | 2.8±1.3[ | 1.4±1.1 |
| Writing | 2.9±1.0 | 1.8±1.6[ | 1.1±1.1 |
| Ability to cut food | 2.6±1.3 | 1.5±1.3 | 0.9±1.0 |
| Ability to dress | 2.6±1.2 | 1.3±1.2 | 1.0±1.1 |
| Ability to turn in bed | 3.0±1.3 | 2.0±1.5[ | 1.2±1.2 |
| Walking | 2.6±0.9 | 1.7±1.1[ | 1.0±1.0 |
| Ability to climb stairs | 2.2±1.3 | 1.1±1.2 | 0.9±1.0 |
| Breathing | 3.1±1.2 | 2.7±1.4[ | 1.3±1.2 |
Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.
P<0.05
P<0.01
P<0.005
P<0.001 vs. R. The inclusion values indicate the mean M score ± standard deviation of patients at the beginning of the study.
Figure 3.Evolution of important motor functions according to in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire score. (A) Speech, (B) salivation, (C) swallowing, (D) writing, (E) ability to cut food, (F) ability to dress, (G) ability to turn in bed, (H) walking, (I) ability to climb stairs and (J) breathing.
Global evolution mean values.
| Mean values | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evolution | No. cases | R2M Group | P-value | M Slope | R2 R Group | P-value | R Slope |
| Improvement | 4 | 0.58 | 0.125 | 0.00234 | −0.98 | <0.0004 | −0.02075 |
| Deceleration | 22 | −0.86 | <0.049 | −0.01357 | −0.98 | <0.0003 | −0.02325 |
| Degradation | 5 | −0.93 | <0.040 | −0.03118 | −0.94 | <0.0001 | −0.02120 |
Figure 4.Disease evolution and sex. F, female; M, male. n=31.