Literature DB >> 29545307

Complete Genome Sequences of the Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria Lactobacillus helveticus D75 and D76.

V A Toropov1, T Y Vakhitov2, O N Shalaeva1, E K Roshchina1, S I Sitkin1.   

Abstract

Lactobacillus helveticus D75 and D76 were isolated from the intestinal tract of a healthy child. Both strains possess symbiotic, probiotic, and antagonistic activities. We have sequenced and annotated the whole genomes of L. helveticus D75 and D76 and have conducted a preliminary genome comparative analysis.
Copyright © 2018 Toropov et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29545307      PMCID: PMC5854786          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.01552-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Lactobacillus helveticus D75 and D76 have pronounced fermentative and probiotic activities (1). It was important to have information that was as complete as possible about the genomes of L. helveticus strains D75 and D76 to understand the mechanisms of regulation of their probiotic activity and syntrophic interactions. L. helveticus D75 and D76 were grown on de Man-Rogosa-Sharpe (MRS) medium (2) at 37°C up to the mid-exponential-growth phase. The modified method of cell lysis of Gram-positive bacteria and the conventional method of DNA extraction with organic solvents were used to obtain the chromosomal DNA (3). The cell lysis consisted of two phases. Initially, a Tris-EDTA buffer containing mutanolysin (final concentration, 300 U/ml) and lysozyme (final concentration, 2 mg/ml) was added to the cell pellet, and the resulting mixture was incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Then, a solution containing sodium dodecyl sulfate (final concentration, 1.5%) and proteinase K (final concentration, 1 mg/ml) was added, and the mixture was incubated at 50°C for 1 h. Both genomic DNAs were sequenced using the PacBio RS II platform (Macrogen, Inc., Republic of Korea) (4–7). Genome libraries consisting of 150,292 and 166,471 reads with N50 values of 22,778 bp and 10,700 bp were obtained for L. helveticus D75 and D76, respectively. The HGAP algorithm in the SMRT Analysis pipeline version 2.3.0 was used to assemble the genomes of L. helveticus D75 and D76 from PacBio RS raw reads (8). The lengths of the whole genomes obtained were 2,053,066 bp (with 422× read multiplicity) and 2,058,319 bp (with 375× read multiplicity) for the L. helveticus D75 and D76 strains, respectively. The genome annotations of L. helveticus D75 and D76 were done using the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) algorithm of the National Center for Biotechnological Information (NCBI) (9). The annotated genome of L. helveticus D75 contained 2,092 coding sequences (CDS), with 1,693 protein-coding genes, 64 tRNA genes, and 15 rRNA genes. The total number of pseudogenes was 317. L. helveticus D76 includes 2,068 CDS, with 1,986 protein-coding genes, 64 tRNA genes, and 15 rRNA genes. The total number of pseudogenes was 265. The BLASTn algorithm was applied for preliminary genome comparative analysis of L. helveticus D75 and D76 with the genomes of L. helveticus DPC4571 and L. helveticus R0052, which were annotated and deposited in GenBank (10, 11). The L. helveticus D75 and D76 strains had 99.18% identity (90.65% coverage) and 97.73% identity (80.45% coverage) to the genomes of the DPC4571 and R0052 strains, respectively. Calculating the average nucleotide identity (ANI) (12–14) showed that the genome sequences of L. helveticus D75 and D76 were 99.22% identical (with 76.3% coverage of the genome) to the genomes of L. helveticus species. Therefore, D75 and D76 strains, previously attributed to L. acidophilus species (based both on phenotype and 16S rRNA genetic analysis), were reclassified as L. helveticus D75 and D76.

Accession number(s).

These whole-genome shotgun projects have been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession no. CP020029 (L. helveticus D75) and CP016827 (L. helveticus D76). The versions described in this paper are the first versions.
  11 in total

1.  Development of a single-tube, cell lysis-based, genus-specific PCR method for rapid identification of mycobacteria: optimization of cell lysis, PCR primers and conditions, and restriction pattern analysis.

Authors:  Izhar U H Khan; Jagjit S Yadav
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  A simple method for the isolation of chromosomal DNA from gram positive or acid-fast bacteria.

Authors:  C Bollet; M J Gevaudan; X de Lamballerie; C Zandotti; P de Micco
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-04-25       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities.

Authors:  Johan Goris; Konstantinos T Konstantinidis; Joel A Klappenbach; Tom Coenye; Peter Vandamme; James M Tiedje
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.747

4.  Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus helveticus R0052, a commercial probiotic strain.

Authors:  Thomas A Tompkins; Guillaume Barreau; Jeffery R Broadbent
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data.

Authors:  Chen-Shan Chin; David H Alexander; Patrick Marks; Aaron A Klammer; James Drake; Cheryl Heiner; Alicia Clum; Alex Copeland; John Huddleston; Evan E Eichler; Stephen W Turner; Jonas Korlach
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Occurrence and stability of insertion sequences in Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains: evaluation of an insertion sequence-dependent DNA polymorphism as a tool in the epidemiology of tuberculosis.

Authors:  D van Soolingen; P W Hermans; P E de Haas; D R Soll; J D van Embden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Genome sequence of Lactobacillus helveticus, an organism distinguished by selective gene loss and insertion sequence element expansion.

Authors:  Michael Callanan; Pawel Kaleta; John O'Callaghan; Orla O'Sullivan; Kieran Jordan; Olivia McAuliffe; Amaia Sangrador-Vegas; Lydia Slattery; Gerald F Fitzgerald; Tom Beresford; R Paul Ross
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 8.  PacBio Sequencing and Its Applications.

Authors:  Anthony Rhoads; Kin Fai Au
Journal:  Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 7.691

9.  NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline.

Authors:  Tatiana Tatusova; Michael DiCuccio; Azat Badretdin; Vyacheslav Chetvernin; Eric P Nawrocki; Leonid Zaslavsky; Alexandre Lomsadze; Kim D Pruitt; Mark Borodovsky; James Ostell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Precision methylome characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) using PacBio single-molecule real-time (SMRT) technology.

Authors:  Lingxiang Zhu; Jun Zhong; Xinmiao Jia; Guan Liu; Yu Kang; Mengxing Dong; Xiuli Zhang; Qian Li; Liya Yue; Cuidan Li; Jing Fu; Jingfa Xiao; Jiangwei Yan; Bing Zhang; Meng Lei; Suting Chen; Lingna Lv; Baoli Zhu; Hairong Huang; Fei Chen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

1.  Genomic analysis of Lactobacillus reuteri WHH1689 reveals its probiotic properties and stress resistance.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Qing Gu; Ping Li; Su Chen; Yanjun Li
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 2.863

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.