Literature DB >> 29544699

6-month versus 12-month or longer dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome (SMART-DATE): a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.

Joo-Yong Hahn1, Young Bin Song1, Ju-Hyeon Oh2, Deok-Kyu Cho3, Jin Bae Lee4, Joon-Hyung Doh5, Sang-Hyun Kim6, Jin-Ok Jeong7, Jang-Ho Bae8, Byung-Ok Kim9, Jang Hyun Cho10, Il-Woo Suh11, Doo-Il Kim12, Hoon-Ki Park13, Jong-Seon Park14, Woong Gil Choi15, Wang Soo Lee16, Jihoon Kim1, Ki Hong Choi1, Taek Kyu Park1, Joo Myung Lee1, Jeong Hoon Yang1, Jin-Ho Choi1, Seung-Hyuk Choi1, Hyeon-Cheol Gwon17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) of aspirin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor for at least 12 months after implantation of drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, available data about the optimal duration of DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention are scant. We aimed to investigate whether a 6-month duration of DAPT would be non-inferior to the conventional 12-month or longer duration of DAPT in this population.
METHODS: We did a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial at 31 centres in South Korea. Patients were eligible if they had unstable angina, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, or ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned, via a web-based system by computer-generated block randomisation, to either the 6-month DAPT group or to the 12-month or longer DAPT group, with stratification by site, clinical presentation, and diabetes. Assessors were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 18 months after the index procedure in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints were the individual components of the primary endpoint; definite or probable stent thrombosis as defined by the Academic Research Consortium; and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2-5 bleeding at 18 months after the index procedure. The primary endpoint was also analysed per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01701453.
FINDINGS: Between Sept 5, 2012, and Dec 31, 2015, we randomly assigned 2712 patients; 1357 to the 6-month DAPT group and 1355 to the 12-month or longer DAPT group. Clopidogrel was used as a P2Y12 inhibitor for DAPT in 1082 (79·7%) patients in the 6-month DAPT group and in 1109 (81·8%) patients in the 12-month or longer DAPT group. The primary endpoint occurred in 63 patients in the 6-month DAPT group and in 56 patients in the 12-month or longer DAPT group (cumulative event rate 4·7% vs 4·2%; absolute risk difference 0·5%; upper limit of one-sided 95% CI 1·8%; pnon-inferiority=0·03 with a predefined non-inferiority margin of 2·0%). Although all-cause mortality did not differ significantly between the 6-month DAPT group and the 12-month or longer DAPT group (35 [2·6%] patients vs 39 [2·9%]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·90 [95% CI 0·57-1·42]; p=0·90) and neither did stroke (11 [0·8%] patients vs 12 [0·9%]; 0·92 [0·41-2·08]; p=0·84), myocardial infarction occurred more frequently in the 6-month DAPT group than in the 12-month or longer DAPT group (24 [1·8%] patients vs ten [0·8%]; 2·41 [1·15-5·05]; p=0·02). 15 (1·1%) patients had stent thrombosis in the 6-month DAPT group compared with ten (0·7%) in the 12-month or longer DAPT group (HR 1·50 [95% CI 0·68-3·35]; p=0·32). The rate of BARC type 2-5 bleeding was 2·7% (35 patients) in the 6-month DAPT group and 3·9% (51 patients) in the 12-month or longer DAPT group (HR 0·69 [95% CI 0·45-1·05]; p=0·09). Results from the per-protocol analysis were similar to those from the intention-to-treat analysis.
INTERPRETATION: The increased risk of myocardial infarction with 6-month DAPT and the wide non-inferiority margin prevent us from concluding that short-term DAPT is safe in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with current-generation DES. Prolonged DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome without excessive risk of bleeding should remain the standard of care. FUNDING: Abbott Vascular Korea, Medtronic Vascular Korea, Biosensors Inc, and Dong-A ST.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29544699     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30493-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  57 in total

1.  Effect of P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The SMART-CHOICE Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Joo-Yong Hahn; Young Bin Song; Ju-Hyeon Oh; Woo Jung Chun; Yong Hawn Park; Woo Jin Jang; Eul-Soon Im; Jin-Ok Jeong; Byung Ryul Cho; Seok Kyu Oh; Kyeong Ho Yun; Deok-Kyu Cho; Jong-Young Lee; Young-Youp Koh; Jang-Whan Bae; Jae Woong Choi; Wang Soo Lee; Hyuck Jun Yoon; Seung Uk Lee; Jang Hyun Cho; Woong Gil Choi; Seung-Woon Rha; Joo Myung Lee; Taek Kyu Park; Jeong Hoon Yang; Jin-Ho Choi; Seung-Hyuck Choi; Sang Hoon Lee; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Is It Safe to Abandon Aspirin?

Authors:  Wen-Han Feng; I-Chang Hsieh; Yi-Heng Li
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 3.  The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary stent implantation: to go too far is as bad as to fall short.

Authors:  Francesco Costa; Marco Valgimigli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2018-10

4.  Effect of a Restrictive vs Liberal Blood Transfusion Strategy on Major Cardiovascular Events Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anemia: The REALITY Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Gregory Ducrocq; Jose R Gonzalez-Juanatey; Etienne Puymirat; Gilles Lemesle; Marine Cachanado; Isabelle Durand-Zaleski; Joan Albert Arnaiz; Manuel Martínez-Sellés; Johanne Silvain; Albert Ariza-Solé; Emile Ferrari; Gonzalo Calvo; Nicolas Danchin; Cristina Avendaño-Solá; Jerome Frenkiel; Alexandra Rousseau; Eric Vicaut; Tabassome Simon; Philippe Gabriel Steg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Meta-analysis of duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Safi U Khan; Irbaz Bin Riaz; Hammad Rahman; Ahmed N Lone; Munis Raza; Muhammad Shahzeb Khan; Anum Riaz; Edo Kaluski
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 7.804

6.  Compliance with the prescription of recommended medical therapy in trials comparing six versus 12 months or longer dual antiplatelet therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Safi U Khan; Muhammad Shahzeb Khan; Edo Kaluski; Mohamad A Alkhouli
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 7.804

7.  Effect of Ticagrelor Monotherapy vs Ticagrelor With Aspirin on Major Bleeding and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: The TICO Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Byeong-Keuk Kim; Sung-Jin Hong; Yun-Hyeong Cho; Kyeong Ho Yun; Yong Hoon Kim; Yongsung Suh; Jae Young Cho; Ae-Young Her; Sungsoo Cho; Dong Woon Jeon; Sang-Yong Yoo; Deok-Kyu Cho; Bum-Kee Hong; Hyuckmoon Kwon; Chul-Min Ahn; Dong-Ho Shin; Chung-Mo Nam; Jung-Sun Kim; Young-Guk Ko; Donghoon Choi; Myeong-Ki Hong; Yangsoo Jang
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Efficacy and safety of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (≤6 months) after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Naoki Misumida; Mohamed Abo-Aly; Sun Moon Kim; Gbolahan O Ogunbayo; Ahmed Abdel-Latif; Khaled M Ziada
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.882

9.  Are We Optimizing the Use of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Hospitalized with Acute Myocardial Infarction?

Authors:  Essa Hariri; Darleen Lessard; Joel Gore; Jeffrey Rade; Robert Goldberg
Journal:  Cardiovasc Revasc Med       Date:  2019-05-02

10.  Utility of the dual antiplatelet therapy score to guide antiplatelet therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nino Mihatov; Eric A Secemsky; Dean J Kereiakes; Gabriel Steg; Patrick W Serruys; Ply Chichareon; Changyu Shen; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.